From 5511861e6dc81e702587bb4d07deba35571db293 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fangrui Song Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 14:02:18 -0800 Subject: [MC][ARM] Delete MCSection::HasData and move SHF_ARM_PURECODE logic to ARMELFObjectWriter::addTargetSectionFlags This simplifies the generic interface and also makes SHF_ARM_PURECODE more robust (fixes a TODO). Inspecting MCDataFragment contents covers more cases than MCObjectStreamer::EmitBytes. --- llvm/lib/MC/MCObjectStreamer.cpp | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/MC/MCObjectStreamer.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/MC/MCObjectStreamer.cpp b/llvm/lib/MC/MCObjectStreamer.cpp index 5c42667f991..d8a7ab043eb 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/MC/MCObjectStreamer.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/MC/MCObjectStreamer.cpp @@ -569,12 +569,6 @@ void MCObjectStreamer::EmitBytes(StringRef Data) { MCDataFragment *DF = getOrCreateDataFragment(); flushPendingLabels(DF, DF->getContents().size()); DF->getContents().append(Data.begin(), Data.end()); - - // EmitBytes might not cover all possible ways we emit data (or could be used - // to emit executable code in some cases), but is the best method we have - // right now for checking this. - MCSection *Sec = getCurrentSectionOnly(); - Sec->setHasData(true); } void MCObjectStreamer::EmitValueToAlignment(unsigned ByteAlignment, -- cgit v1.2.3