From 1a0bbe25e32ef03119c743eb1da50d280640041f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Devang Patel Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:54:45 +0000 Subject: Ignore DBG_VALUE instructions that points to undef values. llvm-svn: 102463 --- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp index 9d239c1bd7c..d663521abaf 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp @@ -3834,15 +3834,10 @@ SelectionDAGBuilder::visitIntrinsicCall(const CallInst &I, unsigned Intrinsic) { return 0; DAG.AddDbgValue(SDV, N.getNode(), isParameter); } else { - // Generating Undefs here seems to be actively harmful because it - // affects the line numbers. - return 0; -#if 0 // This isn't useful, but it shows what we're missing. SDV = DAG.getDbgValue(Variable, UndefValue::get(Address->getType()), 0, dl, SDNodeOrder); DAG.AddDbgValue(SDV, 0, isParameter); -#endif } return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3