From 5e6c361bc068a8b4997891dbfa74d08b52fb5458 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrik Hagglund Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:34:11 +0000 Subject: Change TargetLowering::getRegClassFor to take an MVT, instead of EVT. Accordingly, add helper funtions getSimpleValueType (in parallel to getValueType) in SDValue, SDNode, and TargetLowering. This is the first, in a series of patches. This is the second attempt. In the first attempt (r169837), a few getSimpleVT() were hoisted too far, detected by bootstrap failures. llvm-svn: 170104 --- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp index 8799effe208..05fd7af9fdc 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FunctionLoweringInfo.cpp @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void FunctionLoweringInfo::clear() { } /// CreateReg - Allocate a single virtual register for the given type. -unsigned FunctionLoweringInfo::CreateReg(EVT VT) { +unsigned FunctionLoweringInfo::CreateReg(MVT VT) { return RegInfo->createVirtualRegister(TLI.getRegClassFor(VT)); } @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ unsigned FunctionLoweringInfo::CreateRegs(Type *Ty) { unsigned FirstReg = 0; for (unsigned Value = 0, e = ValueVTs.size(); Value != e; ++Value) { EVT ValueVT = ValueVTs[Value]; - EVT RegisterVT = TLI.getRegisterType(Ty->getContext(), ValueVT); + MVT RegisterVT = TLI.getRegisterType(Ty->getContext(), ValueVT).getSimpleVT(); unsigned NumRegs = TLI.getNumRegisters(Ty->getContext(), ValueVT); for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumRegs; ++i) { -- cgit v1.2.3