From d6908dc4a23cbaf8c9bde979d08fbb7291e7652f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Evan Cheng Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:25:30 +0000 Subject: It's not safe to propagate implicit_def that defines part of a register. llvm-svn: 103436 --- llvm/lib/CodeGen/ProcessImplicitDefs.cpp | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/ProcessImplicitDefs.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ProcessImplicitDefs.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ProcessImplicitDefs.cpp index d7179b3e59c..75875d2835b 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ProcessImplicitDefs.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ProcessImplicitDefs.cpp @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ bool ProcessImplicitDefs::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) { MachineInstr *MI = &*I; ++I; if (MI->isImplicitDef()) { + if (MI->getOperand(0).getSubReg()) + continue; unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg(); ImpDefRegs.insert(Reg); if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { -- cgit v1.2.3