From 7ad13f259f203d6d25bbe263c38e55976a521c33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Craig Topper Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:21:17 +0000 Subject: [LVI] Fix spelling error in comment. NFC llvm-svn: 305115 --- llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp index 9fd196e4156..3ed61a79478 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ bool LazyValueInfoImpl::solveBlockValueImpl(LVILatticeVal &Res, // that for all other pointer typed values, we terminate the search at the // definition. We could easily extend this to look through geps, bitcasts, // and the like to prove non-nullness, but it's not clear that's worth it - // compile time wise. The context-insensative value walk done inside + // compile time wise. The context-insensitive value walk done inside // isKnownNonNull gets most of the profitable cases at much less expense. // This does mean that we have a sensativity to where the defining // instruction is placed, even if it could legally be hoisted much higher. -- cgit v1.2.3