From 10ebffa48a592e2e03b2e8478b03ccdd0e8da2d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Ingham Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 23:02:50 +0000 Subject: Don't expose the pthread_mutex_t underlying the Mutex & Mutex::Locker classes. No one was using it and Locker(pthread_mutex_t *) immediately asserts for pthread_mutex_t's that don't come from a Mutex anyway. Rather than try to make that work, we should maintain the Mutex abstraction and not pass around the platform implementation... Make Mutex::Locker::Lock take a Mutex & or a Mutex *, and remove the constructor taking a pthread_mutex_t *. You no longer need to call Mutex::GetMutex to pass your mutex to a Locker (you can't in fact, since I made it private.) llvm-svn: 156221 --- lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp') diff --git a/lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp b/lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp index e573555625e..c5a89554c62 100644 --- a/lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp +++ b/lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp @@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ ModuleList::RemoveOrphans (bool mandatory) if (mandatory) { - locker.Lock (m_modules_mutex.GetMutex()); + locker.Lock (m_modules_mutex); } else { // Not mandatory, remove orphans if we can get the mutex - if (!locker.TryLock(m_modules_mutex.GetMutex())) + if (!locker.TryLock(m_modules_mutex)) return 0; } collection::iterator pos = m_modules.begin(); -- cgit v1.2.3