From 29872606d220420d53fde7cc5e3bea15f8da62e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raphael Isemann Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 09:12:37 +0000 Subject: [lldb] Restructure test folders to match LLDB command hierarchy Summary: As discussed on lldb-dev, this patch moves some LLDB tests into a hierarchy that more closely resembles the commands we use in the LLDB interpreter. This patch should only move tests that use the command interpreter and shouldn't touch any tests that primarily test the SB API. Reviewers: #lldb, jfb, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67033 llvm-svn: 370605 --- .../context-object-objc/TestContextObjectObjc.py | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/expression/context-object-objc/TestContextObjectObjc.py (limited to 'lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/expression/context-object-objc/TestContextObjectObjc.py') diff --git a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/expression/context-object-objc/TestContextObjectObjc.py b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/expression/context-object-objc/TestContextObjectObjc.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4ae4fd8680d --- /dev/null +++ b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/expression/context-object-objc/TestContextObjectObjc.py @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +""" +Tests expression evaluation in context of an objc class. +""" + +import lldb +import lldbsuite.test.lldbutil as lldbutil +from lldbsuite.test.decorators import * +from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import * + +class ContextObjectObjcTestCase(TestBase): + + mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__) + + @skipUnlessDarwin + def test_context_object_objc(self): + """Tests expression evaluation in context of an objc class.""" + self.build() + + (target, process, thread, bkpt) = lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(self, '// Break here', self.main_source_spec) + frame = thread.GetFrameAtIndex(0) + + # + # Test objc class variable + # + + obj_val = frame.FindVariable("objcClass") + self.assertTrue(obj_val.IsValid()) + obj_val = obj_val.Dereference() + self.assertTrue(obj_val.IsValid()) + + # Test an empty expression evaluation + value = obj_val.EvaluateExpression("") + self.assertFalse(value.IsValid()) + self.assertFalse(value.GetError().Success()) + + # Test retrieving of a field (not a local with the same name) + value = obj_val.EvaluateExpression("field") + self.assertTrue(value.IsValid()) + self.assertTrue(value.GetError().Success()) + self.assertEqual(value.GetValueAsSigned(), 1111) + + # Test if the self pointer is properly evaluated + + # Test retrieving of an objcClass's property through the self pointer + value = obj_val.EvaluateExpression("self.property") + self.assertTrue(value.IsValid()) + self.assertTrue(value.GetError().Success()) + self.assertEqual(value.GetValueAsSigned(), 2222) + + # Test objcClass's methods evaluation through the self pointer + value = obj_val.EvaluateExpression("[self method]") + self.assertTrue(value.IsValid()) + self.assertTrue(value.GetError().Success()) + self.assertEqual(value.GetValueAsSigned(), 3333) + + # Test if we can use a computation result reference object correctly + + obj_val = frame.EvaluateExpression("[ObjcClass createNew]") + self.assertTrue(obj_val.IsValid()) + obj_val = obj_val.Dereference() + self.assertTrue(obj_val.IsValid()) + + # Test an expression evaluation on it + value = obj_val.EvaluateExpression("1") + self.assertTrue(value.IsValid()) + self.assertTrue(value.GetError().Success()) + + # Test retrieving of a field on it + value = obj_val.EvaluateExpression("field") + self.assertTrue(value.IsValid()) + self.assertTrue(value.GetError().Success()) + self.assertEqual(value.GetValueAsSigned(), 1111) + + def setUp(self): + TestBase.setUp(self) + + self.main_source = "main.m" + self.main_source_spec = lldb.SBFileSpec(self.main_source) -- cgit v1.2.3