From 6edc12c8867fe8d21f9abf97b160d12dc2fa3954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Asiri Rathnayake Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 08:57:35 +0000 Subject: [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format: #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X // Do test. #else // Empty test. #endif We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit directives on the same tests. Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730 llvm-svn: 271108 --- .../function.objects/logical.operations/transparent.pass.cpp | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/logical.operations') diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/logical.operations/transparent.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/logical.operations/transparent.pass.cpp index 6e3b7a2eee2..77177b1b325 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/logical.operations/transparent.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/logical.operations/transparent.pass.cpp @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11 #include #include @@ -22,9 +23,8 @@ public: }; -int main () { -#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 11 - +int main () +{ static_assert ( !is_transparent>::value, "" ); static_assert ( !is_transparent>::value, "" ); static_assert ( is_transparent>::value, "" ); @@ -40,7 +40,5 @@ int main () { static_assert ( is_transparent>::value, "" ); static_assert ( is_transparent>::value, "" ); -#endif - return 0; - } +} -- cgit v1.2.3