From 3fddae75c72705d69e7eca26fb2e37cf7c06b6ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nico Weber Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:56:43 +0000 Subject: Don't leak CXStrings for replacement fix-its in c-index-test. The loop body used to contain a switch statement; it looks like r96685 replaced that with an if/else if/else but accidentally left one of the three break statements from the switch behind, skipping the clang_disposeString() call for replacements (and the rest of the loop too, which apparently doesn't make a differences for the test cases we have). r96685: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100215/027754.html This too might possibly the last leak in clang (PR19521). llvm-svn: 208483 --- clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c') diff --git a/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c b/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c index fd2b120f415..99f291ddd7e 100644 --- a/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c +++ b/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c @@ -977,7 +977,6 @@ void PrintDiagnostic(CXDiagnostic Diagnostic) { PrintExtent(out, start_line, start_column, end_line, end_column); fprintf(out, " with \"%s\"\n", clang_getCString(insertion_text)); } - break; } clang_disposeString(insertion_text); } -- cgit v1.2.3