From e29296e48c030e4d161a5055baacd662dda3d799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Majnemer <david.majnemer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:22:03 +0000
Subject: Be more precise when diagnosing 'inline' on global replacement
 functions

llvm-svn: 193061
---
 clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'clang/test')

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
index de26cad62e1..63ec4ccae38 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ void* operator new(size_t, int*); // expected-note 3 {{candidate}}
 void* operator new(size_t, float*); // expected-note 3 {{candidate}}
 void* operator new(size_t, S); // expected-note 2 {{candidate}}
 
-inline void operator delete(void *); // expected-error {{'operator delete' cannot be declared 'inline'}}
+inline void operator delete(void *); // expected-error {{replacement function 'operator delete' cannot be declared 'inline'}}
 
 struct foo { };
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3