From df65c8ed2a2ff426a30f0dbac3ef3ea48a651627 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:49:07 +0000
Subject: When a nested-name-specifier refers into a current instantiation that
 has dependent bases, construct a dependent nested-name-specifier rather than
 complaining that the name could not be found within the current instantiation
 itself. Fixes PR7725.

llvm-svn: 109582
---
 clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

(limited to 'clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp')

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
index 12ab4868091..9c72845fb6a 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
@@ -88,3 +88,14 @@ namespace PR7385 {
 
   has_xxx0<int>::type t; // expected-note{{instantiation of}}
 }
+
+namespace PR7725 {
+  template<class ignored> struct TypedefProvider;
+  template<typename T>
+  struct TemplateClass : public TypedefProvider<T>
+  {
+    void PrintSelf() {
+      TemplateClass::Test::PrintSelf();
+    }
+  };
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3