From 47e40931c9af037ceae73ecab7db739a34160a0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John McCall Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:20:59 +0000 Subject: Make a first pass at implementing -Wglobal-constructors. I'm worried that this will end up bizarrely mirroring CGExprConstant, but that might be the hazard of this feature. llvm-svn: 109984 --- clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) create mode 100644 clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp (limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp') diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d0709c5b79 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wglobal-constructors %s -verify + +int opaque_int(); + +namespace test0 { + // These should never require global constructors. + int a; + int b = 20; + float c = 5.0f; + + // This global constructor is avoidable based on initialization order. + int d = b; // expected-warning {{global constructor}} + + // These global constructors are unavoidable. + int e = opaque_int(); // expected-warning {{global constructor}} + int f = b; // expected-warning {{global constructor}} +} + +namespace test1 { + struct A { int x; }; + A a; + A b = A(); + A c = { 10 }; + A d = { opaque_int() }; // expected-warning {{global constructor}} +} + +namespace test2 { + struct A { A(); }; + A a; // expected-warning {{global constructor}} + A b[10]; // expected-warning {{global constructor}} + A c[10][10]; // expected-warning {{global constructor}} +} + +namespace test3 { + struct A { ~A(); }; + A a; // expected-warning {{global destructor}} + A b[10]; // expected-warning {{global destructor}} + A c[10][10]; // expected-warning {{global destructor}} +} -- cgit v1.2.3