From 2d9c47ea6cd3a42fae439f3d0285eec5af66ff4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eli Friedman Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:18:25 +0000 Subject: PR9615: make sure we destroy any temporaries returned by operator->. I'm pretty sure this is the right fix, but I would appreciate it if someone else would double-check. llvm-svn: 128806 --- clang/test/SemaCXX/operator-arrow-temporary.cpp | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 clang/test/SemaCXX/operator-arrow-temporary.cpp (limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/operator-arrow-temporary.cpp') diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/operator-arrow-temporary.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/operator-arrow-temporary.cpp new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e79609342b --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/operator-arrow-temporary.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s +// PR9615 + +struct Resource { + void doit(); +}; + +template struct Lock { + ~Lock() { int a[x]; } // expected-error {{declared as an array with a negative size}} + Resource* operator->() { return 0; } +}; + +struct Accessor { + Lock<-1> operator->(); +}; + +// Make sure we try to instantiate the destructor for Lock here +void f() { Accessor acc; acc->doit(); } // expected-note {{requested here}} + -- cgit v1.2.3