From f24e6e747b687b561db7a6bfe3331ee7ce206dfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Smith Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:34:55 +0000 Subject: Fix some confusing diagnostic wording. s/implicit default/implicit/ if we're not actually talking about a default constructor. llvm-svn: 183885 --- clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp') diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp index 2663374581c..898c6e0879a 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ struct X11 : X10 { // expected-error {{no suitable member 'operator delete' in ' }; void f() { - X11 x11; // expected-note {{implicit default destructor for 'X11' first required here}} + X11 x11; // expected-note {{implicit destructor for 'X11' first required here}} } struct X12 { @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ namespace ArrayNewNeedsDtor { struct A { A(); private: ~A(); }; // expected-note {{declared private here}} struct B { B(); A a; }; // expected-error {{field of type 'ArrayNewNeedsDtor::A' has private destructor}} B *test9() { - return new B[5]; // expected-note {{implicit default destructor for 'ArrayNewNeedsDtor::B' first required here}} + return new B[5]; // expected-note {{implicit destructor for 'ArrayNewNeedsDtor::B' first required here}} } } -- cgit v1.2.3