From 71ad477ab3b8baa60cf7cc882b1ad924db9f37e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Gregor Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:28:15 +0000 Subject: Do not try to instantiate invalid declarations. It's a recipe for disaster. Fixes PR6161. llvm-svn: 96371 --- clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp') diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp index acd4a23cb35..68323d8d075 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp @@ -159,12 +159,10 @@ void loadEngineFor() { } template struct TBase { - void* operator new(T size, int); // expected-error {{'operator new' cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; use size_t}}\ - // expected-error {{'operator new' takes type size_t}} + void* operator new(T size, int); // expected-error {{'operator new' cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; use size_t}} }; -// FIXME: We should not try to instantiate operator new, since it is invalid. -TBase t1; // expected-note {{in instantiation of template class 'struct TBase' requested here}} +TBase t1; class X6 { public: -- cgit v1.2.3