From 654e5c7cf802af8b04106bcf6852654fc80144eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anders Carlsson <andersca@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:17:38 +0000
Subject: Diagnose ambiguity of operator delete and operator delete[].
 Sebastian, please review.

llvm-svn: 88747
---
 clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

(limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp')

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
index fec3e2034af..63a716338ba 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
@@ -165,3 +165,20 @@ template <class T> struct TBase {
 
 TBase<int> t1; // expected-note {{in instantiation of template class 'struct TBase<int>' requested here}}
 
+class X6 {
+public:
+  static void operator delete(void*, int); // expected-note {{member found by ambiguous name lookup}}
+};
+
+class X7 {
+public:
+  static void operator delete(void*, int); // expected-note {{member found by ambiguous name lookup}}
+};
+
+class X8 : public X6, public X7 {
+};
+
+void f(X8* x8) {
+  delete x8; // expected-error {{member 'operator delete' found in multiple base classes of different types}}
+}
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3