From 3d3208675f79d05fd0b026c735fbe83ecd20a98b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Argyrios Kyrtzidis Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 05:54:49 +0000 Subject: When the out-of-line definition differs from the declaration in the return type, say "out-of-line definition differ from the declaration in the return type" instead of the silly "functions that differ only in their return type cannot be overloaded". Addresses rdar://7980179. llvm-svn: 124939 --- clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp') diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp index 8d33f819af0..1eb7014743c 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp @@ -258,3 +258,8 @@ namespace PR8159 { int ::c; // expected-error{{non-friend class member 'c' cannot have a qualified name}} }; } + +namespace rdar7980179 { + class A { void f0(); }; // expected-note {{previous}} + int A::f0() {} // expected-error {{out-of-line definition of 'rdar7980179::A::f0' differ from the declaration in the return type}} +} -- cgit v1.2.3