From 1ae689c2b8759e4cb5bc9ff334b02c58752f2717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:06:01 +0000
Subject: PR22367: Don't forget to create a CXXFunctionalCastExpr around
 list-initialization that gets converted to some form other than an
 InitListExpr. CXXTemporaryObjectExpr is a special case here, because it
 represents a fused CXXFunctionalCastExpr + CXXConstructExpr. That, in itself,
 is probably a design error...

llvm-svn: 227377
---
 .../test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

(limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp')

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp
index 70f7c642a54..e7b515305d4 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp
@@ -259,3 +259,18 @@ namespace ListInitInstantiate {
   template<typename T> void g() { int k = f({0}); }
   template void g<int>();
 }
+
+namespace TemporaryInitListSourceRange_PR22367 {
+  struct A {
+    constexpr A() {}
+    A(std::initializer_list<int>); // expected-note {{here}}
+  };
+  constexpr int f(A) { return 0; }
+  constexpr int k = f( // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
+      // The point of this test is to check that the caret points to
+      // 'std::initializer_list', not to '{0}'.
+      std::initializer_list // expected-note {{constructor}}
+      <int>
+      {0}
+      );
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3