From 391b19c78a58846b750f589b97759a0dd2962f1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kristof Umann Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 16:02:10 +0000 Subject: [analyzer] Put llvm.Conventions back in alpha Interestingly, this many year old (when I last looked I remember 2010ish) checker was committed without any tests, so I thought I'd implement them, but I was shocked to see how I barely managed to get it working. The code is severely outdated, I'm not even sure it has ever been used, so I'd propose to move it back into alpha, and possibly even remove it. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53856 llvm-svn: 345990 --- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/LLVMConventionsChecker.cpp | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/LLVMConventionsChecker.cpp') diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/LLVMConventionsChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/LLVMConventionsChecker.cpp index db4fbca36de..18618d04598 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/LLVMConventionsChecker.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/LLVMConventionsChecker.cpp @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ static bool IsLLVMStringRef(QualType T) { if (!RT) return false; - return StringRef(QualType(RT, 0).getAsString()) == - "class StringRef"; + return StringRef(QualType(RT, 0).getAsString()) == "class StringRef"; } /// Check whether the declaration is semantically inside the top-level -- cgit v1.2.3