From 83d4834597a779ccafbce6cd91257f4c712adf5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 02:29:26 +0000
Subject: Don't reject dependent range-based for loops in constexpr functions.
 The loop variable isn't really uninitialized, it's just not initialized yet.

llvm-svn: 194767
---
 clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp')

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 660641eec6c..1eec2318e2b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static bool CheckConstexprDeclStmt(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
               diag::err_constexpr_local_var_non_literal_type,
               isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(Dcl)))
           return false;
-        if (!VD->hasInit()) {
+        if (!VD->hasInit() && !VD->isCXXForRangeDecl()) {
           SemaRef.Diag(VD->getLocation(),
                        diag::err_constexpr_local_var_no_init)
             << isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(Dcl);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3