From 5cbe152ffc15d6329e89a3767f1c7f3a371b4c46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:44:58 +0000
Subject: Test for the presence of EH branch-throughs instead of normal
 branch-throughs. I knew this code duplication would bite me.

llvm-svn: 109463
---
 clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp')

diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
index eb471ac173d..d6e498f453c 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::PopCleanupBlock(bool FallthroughIsBranchThrough) {
 
     // If we have exactly one branch-after and no branch-throughs, we
     // can dispatch it without a switch.
-    if (!Scope.hasBranchThroughs() &&
+    if (!Scope.hasEHBranchThroughs() &&
         Scope.getNumEHBranchAfters() == 1) {
       assert(!EHBranchThroughDest);
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3