From 47fb9508714ba52bfb996f7490ce0df3ca52ce88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John McCall Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:37:08 +0000 Subject: Change hasAggregateLLVMType, which conflates complex and aggregate types in a profoundly wrong way that has to be worked around in every call site, to getEvaluationKind, which classifies and distinguishes between all of these cases. Also, normalize the API for loading and storing complexes. I'm working on a larger patch and wanted to pull these changes out, but it would have be annoying to detangle them from each other. llvm-svn: 176656 --- clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp') diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp index f9f27334015..f8921db6551 100644 --- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp @@ -935,24 +935,34 @@ AggExprEmitter::EmitInitializationToLValue(Expr* E, LValue LV) { // FIXME: Are initializers affected by volatile? if (Dest.isZeroed() && isSimpleZero(E, CGF)) { // Storing "i32 0" to a zero'd memory location is a noop. + return; } else if (isa(E) || isa(E)) { - EmitNullInitializationToLValue(LV); + return EmitNullInitializationToLValue(LV); } else if (type->isReferenceType()) { RValue RV = CGF.EmitReferenceBindingToExpr(E, /*InitializedDecl=*/0); - CGF.EmitStoreThroughLValue(RV, LV); - } else if (type->isAnyComplexType()) { - CGF.EmitComplexExprIntoAddr(E, LV.getAddress(), false); - } else if (CGF.hasAggregateLLVMType(type)) { + return CGF.EmitStoreThroughLValue(RV, LV); + } + + switch (CGF.getEvaluationKind(type)) { + case TEK_Complex: + CGF.EmitComplexExprIntoLValue(E, LV, /*isInit*/ true); + return; + case TEK_Aggregate: CGF.EmitAggExpr(E, AggValueSlot::forLValue(LV, AggValueSlot::IsDestructed, AggValueSlot::DoesNotNeedGCBarriers, AggValueSlot::IsNotAliased, Dest.isZeroed())); - } else if (LV.isSimple()) { - CGF.EmitScalarInit(E, /*D=*/0, LV, /*Captured=*/false); - } else { - CGF.EmitStoreThroughLValue(RValue::get(CGF.EmitScalarExpr(E)), LV); + return; + case TEK_Scalar: + if (LV.isSimple()) { + CGF.EmitScalarInit(E, /*D=*/0, LV, /*Captured=*/false); + } else { + CGF.EmitStoreThroughLValue(RValue::get(CGF.EmitScalarExpr(E)), LV); + } + return; } + llvm_unreachable("bad evaluation kind"); } void AggExprEmitter::EmitNullInitializationToLValue(LValue lv) { @@ -963,7 +973,7 @@ void AggExprEmitter::EmitNullInitializationToLValue(LValue lv) { if (Dest.isZeroed() && CGF.getTypes().isZeroInitializable(type)) return; - if (!CGF.hasAggregateLLVMType(type)) { + if (CGF.hasScalarEvaluationKind(type)) { // For non-aggregates, we can store the appropriate null constant. llvm::Value *null = CGF.CGM.EmitNullConstant(type); // Note that the following is not equivalent to @@ -1254,7 +1264,7 @@ static void CheckAggExprForMemSetUse(AggValueSlot &Slot, const Expr *E, /// the value of the aggregate expression is not needed. If VolatileDest is /// true, DestPtr cannot be 0. void CodeGenFunction::EmitAggExpr(const Expr *E, AggValueSlot Slot) { - assert(E && hasAggregateLLVMType(E->getType()) && + assert(E && hasAggregateEvaluationKind(E->getType()) && "Invalid aggregate expression to emit"); assert((Slot.getAddr() != 0 || Slot.isIgnored()) && "slot has bits but no address"); @@ -1266,7 +1276,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitAggExpr(const Expr *E, AggValueSlot Slot) { } LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitAggExprToLValue(const Expr *E) { - assert(hasAggregateLLVMType(E->getType()) && "Invalid argument!"); + assert(hasAggregateEvaluationKind(E->getType()) && "Invalid argument!"); llvm::Value *Temp = CreateMemTemp(E->getType()); LValue LV = MakeAddrLValue(Temp, E->getType()); EmitAggExpr(E, AggValueSlot::forLValue(LV, AggValueSlot::IsNotDestructed, -- cgit v1.2.3