From 42770525ebbd2cdd5f9c362897c225eb20719202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:42:23 +0000
Subject: Add some comments

llvm-svn: 260966
---
 libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
index b2f8e45bd98..c08ff65ae40 100644
--- a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
+++ b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2537">2537</a></td><td>Constructors for <code>priority_queue</code> taking allocators should call <code>make_heap</code></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2539">2539</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] <tt>invocation_trait</tt> definition definition doesn't work for surrogate call functions</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2545">2545</a></td><td>Simplify wording for <tt>bind</tt> without explicitly specified return type</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2557">2557</a></td><td>Logical operator traits are broken in the zero-argument case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2558">2558</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Logical operator traits are broken in the zero-argument case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2557">2557</a></td><td>Logical operator traits are broken in the zero-argument case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2558">2558</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Logical operator traits are broken in the zero-argument case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2559">2559</a></td><td>Error in LWG 2234's resolution</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2560">2560</a></td><td><tt>is_constructible</tt> underspecified when applied to a function type</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2565">2565</a></td><td><tt>std::function</tt>'s move constructor should guarantee nothrow for <tt>reference_wrapper</tt>s and function pointers</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@
 <h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
 <ul>
 <li>2192 - </li>
-<li>2253 - </li>
-<li>2255 - </li>
+<li>2253 - Arrays.ts is moribund. No action needed.</li>
+<li>2255 - Arrays.ts is moribund. No action needed.</li>
 <li>2276 - </li>
 <li>2450 - </li>
 <li>2520 - </li>
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@
 <li>2537 - </li>
 <li>2539 - </li>
 <li>2545 - </li>
-<li>2557 - </li>
-<li>2558 - </li>
+<li>2557 - Cleaning up wording; no code change required.</li>
+<li>2558 - Cleaning up wording; no code change required.</li>
 <li>2559 - </li>
 <li>2560 - </li>
 <li>2565 - </li>
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@
 <li>2575 - I don't think we ever implemented this; so 'removing' it is trivial</li>
 <li>2576 - This one is simple</li>
 <li>2577 - This one is simple</li>
-<li>2579 - </li>
+<li>2579 - This one is simple</li>
 <li>2581 - </li>
 <li>2582 - </li>
-<li>2583 - </li>
-<li>2585 - </li>
+<li>2583 - This looks easy.</li>
+<li>2585 - This looks easy.</li>
 <li>2586 - </li>
 <li>2590 - </li>
 </ul>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3