| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch ports DependenceInfo to the new ScopPassManager. Printing is implemented as a seperate printer pass.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: llvm-commits, pollydev
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33421
llvm-svn: 303621
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303615
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303612
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303611
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303610
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This speeds up scop modeling for scops with many redundent existentially
quantified constraints. For the attached test case, this change reduces
scop modeling time from minutes (hours?) to 0.15 seconds.
This change resolves a compilation timeout on the AOSP build.
Thanks Eli for reporting _and_ reducing the test case!
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 303600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow the BlockGenerator to generate memory writes that are not defined
over the complete statement domain, but only over a subset of it. It
generates a condition that evaluates to 1 if executing the subdomain,
and only then execute the access.
Only write accesses are supported. Read accesses would require a PHINode
which has a value if the access is not executed.
Partial write makes DeLICM able to apply mappings that are not defined
over the entire domain (for instance, a branch that leaves a loop with
a PHINode in its header; a MemoryKind::PHI write when leaving is never
read by its PHI read).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33255
llvm-svn: 303517
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303514
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303511
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- We use the outermost dimension of arrays since we need this
information to generate GPU transfers.
- In general, if we do not know the outermost dimension of the array
(because the indexing expression is non-affine, for example) then we
simply cannot generate transfer code.
- However, for Fortran arrays, we can use the Fortran array
representation which stores the dimensions of all arrays.
- This patch uses the Fortran array representation to generate code that
computes the outermost dimension size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32967
llvm-svn: 303429
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is useful when only analyzing functions.
llvm-svn: 303420
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The following test case tried to compute the lexicographic minimum of the
following set during alias analysis, which caused very long compile time:
[p_0, p_1, p_2, p_3, p_4, p_5] -> { MemRef0[i0] : (517p_3 >= 70944 - 298p_2 and
256i0 >= -71199 + 298p_2 + 517p_3 and 256i0 <= -70944 + 298p_2 + 517p_3) or
(409p_4 >= 57120 - 298p_2 and 256i0 >= -57375 + 298p_2 + 409p_4 and 256i0 <=
-57120 + 298p_2 + 409p_4) or (104p_4 >= 17329 + 149p_2 - 50p_3 and 128i0 >=
17328 + 149p_2 - 50p_3 - 104p_4 and 128i0 <= 17455 + 149p_2 - 50p_3 - 104p_4) or
(104p_4 <= 17328 + 149p_2 - 50p_3 and 128i0 >= 17201 + 149p_2 - 50p_3 - 104p_4
and 128i0 <= 17328 + 149p_2 - 50p_3 - 104p_4) or (409p_4 <= 57119 - 298p_2 and
256i0 >= -57120 + 298p_2 + 409p_4 and 256i0 <= -56865 + 298p_2 + 409p_4) or
(517p_3 <= 70943 - 298p_2 and 256i0 >= -70944 + 298p_2 + 517p_3 and 256i0 <=
-70689 + 298p_2 + 517p_3) or (p_1 >= 2 + 2p_0 and 298p_5 >= 70944 - 517p_3 and
256i0 >= -71199 + 517p_3 + 298p_5 and 256i0 <= -70944 + 517p_3 + 298p_5) or (p_1
>= 2 + 2p_0 and 298p_5 >= 57120 - 409p_4 and 256i0 >= -57375 + 409p_4 + 298p_5
>and 256i0 <= -57120 + 409p_4 + 298p_5) or (p_1 >= 2 + 2p_0 and 149p_5 <= -17329
>+ 50p_3 + 104p_4 and 128i0 >= 17328 - 50p_3 - 104p_4 + 149p_5 and 128i0 <=
>17455 - 50p_3 - 104p_4 + 149p_5) or (p_1 >= 2 + 2p_0 and 149p_5 >= -17328 +
>50p_3 + 104p_4 and 128i0 >= 17201 - 50p_3 - 104p_4 + 149p_5 and 128i0 <= 17328
>- 50p_3 - 104p_4 + 149p_5) or (p_1 >= 2 + 2p_0 and 298p_5 <= 57119 - 409p_4 and
>256i0 >= -57120 + 409p_4 + 298p_5 and 256i0 <= -56865 + 409p_4 + 298p_5) or
>(p_1 >= 2 + 2p_0 and 298p_5 <= 70943 - 517p_3 and 256i0 >= -70944 + 517p_3 +
>298p_5 and 256i0 <= -70689 + 517p_3 + 298p_5) }
We now guard the potentially expensive functions in Polly's scop analysis to
gracefully bail out in case of overly long compilation times.
llvm-svn: 303404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In r302231 we mistakenly use bitwise or (|) instead of logical
or (||). This patch fixes that.
Contributed-by: Sameer AbuAsal <sabuasal@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33337
llvm-svn: 303386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- Rename global / local naming convention that did not make much sense
to Visible / Invisible, where the visible refers to whether the ALLOCATE
call to the Fortran array is present in the current module or not.
- This match now works on both cross fortran module globals and on
parameters to functions since neither of them are necessarily allocated
at the point of their usage.
- Add testcase that matches against both a load and a store against
function parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33190
llvm-svn: 303356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds both a ScopAnalysisManager and a ScopPassManager.
The ScopAnalysisManager is itself a Function-Analysis, and manages
analyses on Scops. The ScopPassManager takes care of building Scop pass
pipelines.
This patch is marked WIP because I've left two FIXMEs which I need to
think about some more. Both of these deal with invalidation:
Deferred invalidation is currently not implemented. Deferred
invalidation deals with analyses which cache references to other
analysis results. If these results are invalidated, invalidation needs
to be propagated into the caching analyses.
The ScopPassManager as implemented assumes that ScopPasses do not affect
other Scops in any way. There has been some discussion about this on
other patch threads, however it makes sense to reiterate this for this
specific patch.
I'm uploading this patch even though it's incomplete to encourage
discussion and give you an impression of how this is going to work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33192
llvm-svn: 303062
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This breaks the previous assumption that Fortran Arrays are `GlobalValue`.
- The names of functions were getting unwieldy. So, I renamed the
Fortran related functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33075
llvm-svn: 303040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This is a proof of concept of how to port polly-passes to the new PassManager architecture. This approach works ootb for Function-Passes, but might not be directly applicable to Scop/Region-Passes. While we could just run the Analyses/Transforms over functions instead, we'd surrender the nice pipelining behaviour we have now.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, grosser
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, sanjoy, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31459
llvm-svn: 302902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previous to this patch, we used VirtualUse to determine the input
access of an llvm::Value in a statement. The input access is the
READ MemoryAccess that makes a value available in that statement,
which can either be a READ of a MemoryKind::Value or the
MemoryKind::PHI for a PHINode in the statement. DeLICM uses the input
access to heuristically find a candidate to map without searching all
possible values.
This might modify the behaviour in that previously PHI accesses were
not considered input accesses before. This was unintentially lost when
"VirtualUse" was extracted from the "Known Knowledge" patch.
llvm-svn: 302838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When removing a MemoryAccess, also remove it from maps pointing to it.
This was already done for InstructionToAccess, but not yet for
ValueReads, ValueWrites and PHIWrites as those were only used during
the ScopBuilder phase. Keeping them updated allows us to use them
later as well.
llvm-svn: 302836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was:
#ifdef NDEBUG
This should be:
#ifndef NDEBUG
Also, the variable name was incorrect. Fixed the variable name.
llvm-svn: 302696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the ability to tag certain memory accesses as those belonging to
Fortran arrays. We do this by pattern matching against known patterns
of Dragonegg's LLVM IR output from Fortran code.
Fortran arrays have metadata stored with them in a struct. This struct
is called the "Fortran array descriptor", and a reference to this is
stored in each MemoryAccess.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32639
llvm-svn: 302653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In case two arrays share base pointers in the same invariant load equivalence
class, we canonicalize all memory accesses to the first of these arrays
(according to their order in the equivalence class).
This enables us to optimize kernels such as boost::ublas by ensuring that
different references to the C array are interpreted as accesses to the same
array. Before this change the runtime alias check for ublas would fail, as it
would assume models of the C array with differing (but identically valued) base
pointers would reference distinct regions of memory whereas the referenced
memory regions were indeed identical.
As part of this change we remove most of the MemoryAccess::get*BaseAddr
interface. We removed already all references to get*BaseAddr in previous
commits to ensure that no code relies on matching base pointers between
memory accesses and scop arrays -- except for three remaining uses where we
need the original base pointer. We document for these situations that
MemoryAccess::getOriginalBaseAddr may return a base pointer that is distinct
to the base pointer of the scop array referenced by this memory access.
Reviewers: sebpop, Meinersbur, zinob, gareevroman, pollydev, huihuiz, efriedma, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: etherzhhb
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28518
llvm-svn: 302636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extend the Knowledge class to store information about the contents
of array elements and which values are written. Two knowledges do
not conflict the known content is the same. The content information
if computed from writes to and loads from the array elements, and
represented by "ValInst": isl spaces that compare equal if the value
represented is the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31247
llvm-svn: 302339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Scop::init is used only during SCoP construction. Therefore ScopBuilder
seems the more appropriate place for it. We integrate it onto its only
caller ScopBuilder::buildScop where some other construction steps
already took place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32908
llvm-svn: 302276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SCoPs with unfeasible runtime context are thrown away and therefore
do not need their uses verified.
The added test case requires a complexity limit to exceed.
Normally, error statements are removed from the SCoP and for that
reason are skipped during the verification. If there is a unfeasible
runtime context (here: because of the complexity limit being reached),
the removal of error statements and other SCoP construction steps are
skipped to not waste time. Error statements are not modeled in SCoPs
and therefore have no requirements on whether the scalars used in
them are available.
llvm-svn: 302234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since r294891, in MemoryAccess::computeBoundsOnAccessRelation(), we skip
manually bounding the access relation in case the parameter of the load
instruction is already a wrapped set. Later on we assume that the lower
bound on the set is always smaller or equal to the upper bound on the
set. Bug 32715 manages to construct a sign wrapped set, in which case
the assertion does not necessarily hold. Fix this by handling a sign
wrapped set similar to a normal wrapped set, that is skipping the
computation.
Contributed-by: Maximilian Falkenstein <falkensm@student.ethz.ch>
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #Polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32893
llvm-svn: 302231
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was forgotten in r302157.
llvm-svn: 302163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a ScopStmt references a (scalar) value, there are multiple
possibilities where this value can come. The decision about what kind of
use it is must be handled consistently at different places, which can be
error-prone. VirtualUse is meant to centralize the handling of the
different types of value uses.
This patch makes ScopBuilder and CodeGeneration use VirtualUse. This
already helps to show inconsistencies with the value handling. In order
to keep this patch NFC, exceptions to the general rules are added.
These might be fixed later if they turn to problems. Overall, this
should result in fewer post-codegen IR-verification errors, but instead
assertion failures in `getNewValue` that are closer to the actual error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32667
llvm-svn: 302157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For certain test cases we spent over 50% of the scop detection time in
checking if a load is likely invariant. We can avoid most of these checks by
testing early on if a load is expected to be invariant. Doing this reduces
scop-detection time on a large benchmark from 52 seconds to just 25 seconds.
No functional change is expected.
llvm-svn: 302134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLVM-IR names are commonly available in debug builds, but often not in release
builds. Hence, using LLVM-IR names to identify statements or memory reference
results makes the behavior of Polly depend on the compile mode. This is
undesirable. Hence, we now just number the statements instead of using LLVM-IR
names to identify them (this issue has previously been brought up by Zino
Benaissa).
However, as LLVM-IR names help in making test cases more readable, we add an
option '-polly-use-llvm-names' to still use LLVM-IR names. This flag is by
default set in the polly tests to make test cases more readable.
This change reduces the time in ScopInfo from 32 seconds to 2 seconds for the
following test case provided by Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org> (already
used in one of the previous commits):
struct X { int x; };
void a();
#define SIG (int x, X **y, X **z)
typedef void (*fn)SIG;
#define FN { for (int i = 0; i < x; ++i) { (*y)[i].x += (*z)[i].x; } a(); }
#define FN5 FN FN FN FN FN
#define FN25 FN5 FN5 FN5 FN5
#define FN125 FN25 FN25 FN25 FN25 FN25
#define FN250 FN125 FN125
#define FN1250 FN250 FN250 FN250 FN250 FN250
void x SIG { FN1250 }
For a larger benchmark I have on-hand (10000 loops), this reduces the time for
running -polly-scops from 5 minutes to 4 minutes, a reduction by 20%.
The reason for this large speedup is that our previous use of printAsOperand
had a quadratic cost, as for each printed and unnamed operand the full function
was scanned to find the instruction number that identifies the operand.
We do not need to adjust the way memory reference ids are constructured, as
they do not use LLVM values.
Reviewed by: efriedma
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32789
llvm-svn: 302072
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 302005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this change a memory reference identifier had the form:
<STMT>_<ACCESSTYPE><ID>_<MEMREF>, e.g., Stmt_bb9_Write0_MemRef_tmp11
After this change, we use the format:
<STMT>_<ACCESSTYPE><ID>, e.g., Stmt_bb9_Write0
The name of the array that is accessed through a memory reference is not
necessary to uniquely identify a memory reference, but was only added to
provide additional information for debugging. We drop this information now
for the following two reasons:
1) This shortens the names and consequently improves readability
2) This removes a second location where we decide on the name of a scop array,
leaving us only with the location where the actual scop array is created.
Having after 2) only a single location to name scop arrays will allow us to
change the naming convention of scop arrays more easily, which we will do
in a future commit to reduce compilation time.
llvm-svn: 302004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we introduced in r297375 support for hoisting loads that are known
to be dereferencable without any conditional guard, we forgot to keep the check
to verify that no other write into the very same location exists. This
change ensures now that dereferencable loads are allowed to access everything,
but can only be hoisted in case no conflicting write exists.
This resolves llvm.org/PR32778
Reported-by: Huihui Zhang <huihuiz@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 301582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Earlier, the call to buildFlow was:
WAR = buildFlow(Write, Read, MustWrite, Schedule).
This meant that Read could block another Read, since must-sources can
block each other.
Fixed the call to buildFlow to correctly compute Read. The resulting
code needs to do some ISL juggling to get the output we want.
Bug report: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32623
Reviewers: Meinersbur
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32011
llvm-svn: 301266
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suggested-by: Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 299914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
= Change of WAR, WAW generation: =
- `buildFlow(Sink, MustSource, MaySource, Sink)` treates any flow of the form
`sink <- may source <- must source` as a *may* dependence.
- we used to call:
```lang=cpp, name=old-flow-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(MustWrite, MustWrite, Read, Schedule);
WAW = isl_union_flow_get_must_dependence(Flow);
WAR = isl_union_flow_get_may_dependence(Flow);
```
- This caused some WAW dependences to be treated as WAR dependences.
- Incorrect semantics.
- Now, we call WAR and WAW correctly.
== Correct WAW: ==
```lang=cpp, name=new-waw-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(Write, MustWrite, MayWrite, Schedule);
WAW = isl_union_flow_get_may_dependence(Flow);
isl_union_flow_free(Flow);
```
== Correct WAR: ==
```lang=cpp, name=new-war-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(Write, Read, MustaWrite, Schedule);
WAR = isl_union_flow_get_must_dependence(Flow);
isl_union_flow_free(Flow);
```
- We want the "shortest" WAR possible (exact dependences).
- We mark all the *must-writes* as may-source, reads as must-souce.
- Then, we ask for *must* dependence.
- This removes all the reads that flow through a *must-write*
before reaching a sink.
- Note that we only block ealier writes with *must-writes*. This is
intuitively correct, as we do not want may-writes to block
must-writes.
- Leaves us with direct (R -> W).
- This affects reduction generation since RED is built using WAW and WAR.
= New StrictWAW for Reductions: =
- We used to call:
```lang=cpp,name=old-waw-war-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(MustWrite, MustWrite, Read, Schedule);
WAW = isl_union_flow_get_must_dependence(Flow);
WAR = isl_union_flow_get_may_dependence(Flow);
```
- This *is* the right model of WAW we need for reductions, just not in general.
- Reductions need to track only *strict* WAW, without any interfering reductions.
= Explanation: Why the new WAR dependences in tests are correct: =
- We no longer set WAR = WAR - WAW
- Hence, we will have WAR dependences that were originally removed.
- These may look incorrect, but in fact make sense.
== Code: ==
```lang=llvm, name=new-war-dependence.ll
; void manyreductions(long *A) {
; for (long i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < 1024; j++)
; S0: *A += 42;
;
; for (long i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < 1024; j++)
; S1: *A += 42;
;
```
=== WAR dependence: ===
{ S0[1023, 1023] -> S1[0, 0] }
- Between `S0[1023, 1023]` and `S1[0, 0]`, we will have the dependences:
```lang=cpp, name=dependence-incorrect, counterexample
S0[1023, 1023]:
*-- tmp = *A (load0)--*
WAR 2 add = tmp + 42 |
*-> *A = add (store0) |
WAR 1
S1[0, 0]: |
tmp = *A (load1) |
add = tmp + 42 |
A = add (store1)<-*
```
- One may assume that WAR2 *hides* WAR1 (since store0 happens before
store1). However, within a statement, Polly has no idea about the
ordering of loads and stores.
- Hence, according to Polly, the code may have looked like this:
```lang=cpp, name=dependence-correct
S0[1023, 1023]:
A = add (store0)
tmp = A (load0) ---*
add = A + 42 |
WAR 1
S1[0, 0]: |
tmp = A (load1) |
add = A + 42 |
A = add (store1) <-*
```
- So, Polly generates (correct) WAR dependences. It does not make sense
to remove these dependences, since they are correct with respect to
Polly's model.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur
tags: #polly
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31386
llvm-svn: 299429
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299356
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299026
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Write" is an overloaded term. In collectInfo() till buildFlow(), it is
used to mean "must writes". However, within the memory based analysis,
it is used to mean "both may and must writes". Renaming the Write
variable helps clarify this difference.
Reviewers: grosser
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31181
llvm-svn: 298361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The AssumptionCache removal of r289756 has been reverted in
r290086/r290087. A different solution has been implemented in r291671
which keeps the AssumptionCache. We can therefore use it again in Polly.
This reverts r289791.
llvm-svn: 298089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since may-writes are always a superset of the must-writes, there is no
point in taking a union of one with the other.
llvm-svn: 298085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the previous default ScopInfo applied the profitability heuristic for
scalar accesses (-polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs=true) and the
-polly-prune-unprofitable was disabled by default
(-polly-enable-prune-unprofitable=false) as that pruning was already done.
This changes switches the defaults to -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs=true
-polly-enable-prune-unprofitable=false such that the scalar access
heuristic check is done by the pass. This allows passes between ScopInfo
and PruneUnprofitable to optimize away scalar accesses.
Without enabling such intermediate passes, there is no change in
behaviour of profitability checks in a PassManagerBuilder built
pass chain, but it allows us to cover this configuration with the
buildbots.
Suggested-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
llvm-svn: 298081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ScopInfo's normal profitability heuristic considers SCoPs where all
statements have scalar writes as not profitably optimizable and
invalidate the SCoP in that case. However, -polly-delicm and
-polly-simplify may be able to remove some of the scalar writes such
that the flag -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs=false allows disabling
that part of the heuristic.
In cases where DeLICM (or other passes after ScopInfo) are not
successful in removing scalar writes, the SCoP is still not profitably
optimizable. The schedule optimizer would again try computing another
schedule, resulting in slower compilation.
The -polly-prune-unprofitable pass applies the profitability heuristic
again before the schedule optimizer Polly can still bail out even with
-polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs=false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31033
llvm-svn: 298080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For experiments it is sometimes helpful to provide parameter bound information
to polly and to not use these parameter bounds for simplification.
Add a new option "-polly-ignore-parameter-bounds" which does precisely this.
llvm-svn: 298077
|