summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Utils/MemorySSA.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [MemorySSA] Fix bugs in walker; refactor unittests a bit.George Burgess IV2016-04-291-23/+163
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch fixes two somewhat related bugs in MemorySSA's caching walker. These bugs were found because D19695 brought up the problem that we'd have defs cached to themselves, which is incorrect. The bugs this fixes are: - We would sometimes skip the nearest clobber of a MemoryAccess, because we would query our cache for a given potential clobber before checking if the potential clobber is the clobber we're looking for. The cache entry for the potential clobber would point to the nearest clobber *of the potential clobber*, so if that was a cache hit, we'd ignore the potential clobber entirely. - There are times (sometimes in DFS, sometimes in the getClobbering... functions) where we would insert cache entries that say a def clobbers itself. There's a bit of common code between the fixes for the bugs, so they aren't split out into multiple commits. This patch also adds a few unit tests, and refactors existing tests a bit to reduce the duplication of setup code. llvm-svn: 268087
* Remove every uses of getGlobalContext() in LLVM (but the C API)Mehdi Amini2016-04-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | At the same time, fixes InstructionsTest::CastInst unittest: yes you can leave the IR in an invalid state and exit when you don't destroy the context (like the global one), no longer now. This is the first part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D19094 From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 266379
* Really fix ASAN leak/etc issues with MemorySSA unittestsDaniel Berlin2016-03-021-10/+11
| | | | llvm-svn: 262519
* Revert "Fix ASAN detected errors in code and test" (it was not meant to be ↵Daniel Berlin2016-03-021-11/+10
| | | | | | | | committed yet) This reverts commit 890bbccd600ba1eb050353d06a29650ad0f2eb95. llvm-svn: 262512
* Fix ASAN detected errors in code and testDaniel Berlin2016-03-021-10/+11
| | | | llvm-svn: 262511
* [AA] Hoist the logic to reformulate various AA queries in terms of otherChandler Carruth2016-03-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | parts of the AA interface out of the base class of every single AA result object. Because this logic reformulates the query in terms of some other aspect of the API, it would easily cause O(n^2) query patterns in alias analysis. These could in turn be magnified further based on the number of call arguments, and then further based on the number of AA queries made for a particular call. This ended up causing problems for Rust that were actually noticable enough to get a bug (PR26564) and probably other places as well. When originally re-working the AA infrastructure, the desire was to regularize the pattern of refinement without losing any generality. While I think it was successful, that is clearly proving to be too costly. And the cost is needless: we gain no actual improvement for this generality of making a direct query to tbaa actually be able to re-use some other alias analysis's refinement logic for one of the other APIs, or some such. In short, this is entirely wasted work. To the extent possible, delegation to other API surfaces should be done at the aggregation layer so that we can avoid re-walking the aggregation. In fact, this significantly simplifies the logic as we no longer need to smuggle the aggregation layer into each alias analysis (or the TargetLibraryInfo into each alias analysis just so we can form argument memory locations!). However, we also have some delegation logic inside of BasicAA and some of it even makes sense. When the delegation logic is baking in specific knowledge of aliasing properties of the LLVM IR, as opposed to simply reformulating the query to utilize a different alias analysis interface entry point, it makes a lot of sense to restrict that logic to a different layer such as BasicAA. So one aspect of the delegation that was in every AA base class is that when we don't have operand bundles, we re-use function AA results as a fallback for callsite alias results. This relies on the IR properties of calls and functions w.r.t. aliasing, and so seems a better fit to BasicAA. I've lifted the logic up to that point where it seems to be a natural fit. This still does a bit of redundant work (we query function attributes twice, once via the callsite and once via the function AA query) but it is *exactly* twice here, no more. The end result is that all of the delegation logic is hoisted out of the base class and into either the aggregation layer when it is a pure retargeting to a different API surface, or into BasicAA when it relies on the IR's aliasing properties. This should fix the quadratic query pattern reported in PR26564, although I don't have a stand-alone test case to reproduce it. It also seems general goodness. Now the numerous AAs that don't need target library info don't carry it around and depend on it. I think I can even rip out the general access to the aggregation layer and only expose that in BasicAA as it is the only place where we re-query in that manner. However, this is a non-trivial change to the AA infrastructure so I want to get some additional eyes on this before it lands. Sadly, it can't wait long because we should really cherry pick this into 3.8 if we're going to go this route. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17329 llvm-svn: 262490
* Add the beginnings of an update API for preserving MemorySSADaniel Berlin2016-03-011-0/+87
Summary: This adds the beginning of an update API to preserve MemorySSA. In particular, this patch adds a way to remove memory SSA accesses when instructions are deleted. It also adds relevant unit testing infrastructure for MemorySSA's API. (There is an actual user of this API, i will make that diff dependent on this one. In practice, a ton of opt passes remove memory instructions, so it's hopefully an obviously useful API :P) Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, george.burgess.iv Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17157 llvm-svn: 262362
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud