summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/unittests/DebugInfo/CodeView
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [PDB] Add symbols to the PDBReid Kleckner2017-06-211-8/+79
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The main complexity in adding symbol records is that we need to "relocate" all the type indices. Type indices do not have anything like relocations, an opaque data structure describing where to find existing type indices for fixups. The linker just has to "know" where the type references are in the symbol records. I added an overload of `discoverTypeIndices` that works on symbol records, and it seems to be able to link the standard library. Reviewers: zturner, ruiu Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34432 llvm-svn: 305933
* Try to fix uninitialized read in unit test.Zachary Turner2017-06-191-0/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 305753
* [CodeView] Fix random access of type names.Zachary Turner2017-06-161-0/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Suppose we had a type index offsets array with a boundary at type index N. Then you request the name of the type with index N+1, and that name requires the name of index N-1 (think a parameter list, for example). We didn't handle this, and we would print something like (<unknown UDT>, <unknown UDT>). The fix for this is not entirely trivial, and speaks to a larger problem. I think we need to kill TypeDatabase, or at the very least kill TypeDatabaseVisitor. We need a thing that doesn't do any caching whatsoever, just given a type index it can compute the type name "the slow way". The reason for the bug is that we don't have anything like that. Everything goes through the type database, and if we've visited a record, then we're "done". It doesn't know how to do the expensive thing of re-visiting dependent records if they've not yet been visited. What I've done here is more or less copied the code (albeit greatly simplified) from TypeDatabaseVisitor, but wrapped it in an interface that just returns a std::string. The logic of caching the name is now in LazyRandomTypeCollection. Eventually I'd like to move the record database here as well and the visited record bitfield here as well, at which point we can actually just delete TypeDatabase. I don't see any reason for it if a "sequential" collection is just a special case of a random access collection with an empty partial offsets array. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34297 llvm-svn: 305612
* Don't include TestingSupport in LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS.Zachary Turner2017-06-141-1/+2
| | | | | | | | Instead use target_link_libraries directly. Thanks to Juergen Ributzka for the suggestion, which fixes an issue when llvm is configured with no targets. llvm-svn: 305421
* [gtest] Create a shared include directory for gtest utilities.Zachary Turner2017-06-144-90/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Many times unit tests for different libraries would like to use the same helper functions for checking common types of errors. This patch adds a common library with helpers for testing things in Support, and introduces helpers in here for integrating the llvm::Error and llvm::Expected<T> classes with gtest and gmock. Normally, we would just be able to write: EXPECT_THAT(someFunction(), succeeded()); but due to some quirks in llvm::Error's move semantics, gmock doesn't make this easy, so two macros EXPECT_THAT_ERROR() and EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED() are introduced to gloss over the difficulties. Consider this an exception, and possibly only temporary as we look for ways to improve this. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33059 llvm-svn: 305395
* [CV Type Merging] Find nested type indices faster.Zachary Turner2017-05-253-0/+506
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Merging two type streams is one of the most time consuming parts of generating a PDB, and as such it needs to be as fast as possible. The visitor abstractions used for interoperating nicely with many different types of inputs and outputs have been used widely and help greatly for testability and implementing tools, but the abstractions build up and get in the way of performance. This patch removes all of the visitation stuff from the type stream merger, essentially re-inventing the leaf / member switch and loop, but at a very low level. This allows us many other optimizations, such as not actually deserializing *any* records (even member records which don't describe their own length), as the operation of "figure out how long this record is" is somewhat faster than "figure out how long this record *and* get all its fields out". Furthermore, whereas before we had to deserialize, re-write type indices, then re-serialize, now we don't have to do any of those 3 steps. We just find out where the type indices are and pull them directly out of the byte stream and re-write them. This is worth a 50-60% performance increase. On top of all other optimizations that have been applied this week, I now get the following numbers when linking lld.exe and lld.pdb MSVC: 25.67s Before This Patch: 18.59s After This Patch: 8.92s So this is a huge performance win. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33564 llvm-svn: 303935
* Resubmit "[CodeView] Provide a common interface for type collections."Zachary Turner2017-05-191-44/+39
| | | | | | | | | | | | This was originally reverted because it was a breaking a bunch of bots and the breakage was not surfacing on Windows. After much head-scratching this was ultimately traced back to a bug in the lit test runner related to its pipe handling. Now that the bug in lit is fixed, Windows correctly reports these test failures, and as such I have finally (hopefully) fixed all of them in this patch. llvm-svn: 303446
* Revert "[CodeView] Provide a common interface for type collections."Zachary Turner2017-05-191-39/+44
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a squash of ~5 reverts of, well, pretty much everything I did today. Something is seriously broken with lit on Windows right now, and as a result assertions that fire in tests are triggering failures. I've been breaking non-Windows bots all day which has seriously confused me because all my tests have been passing, and after running lit with -a to view the output even on successful runs, I find out that the tool is crashing and yet lit is still reporting it as a success! At this point I don't even know where to start, so rather than leave the tree broken for who knows how long, I will get this back to green, and then once lit is fixed on Windows, hopefully hopefully fix the remaining set of problems for real. llvm-svn: 303409
* [CodeView] Provide a common interface for type collections.Zachary Turner2017-05-181-44/+39
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Right now we have multiple notions of things that represent collections of types. Most commonly used are TypeDatabase, which is supposed to keep mappings from TypeIndex to type name when reading a type stream, which happens when reading PDBs. And also TypeTableBuilder, which is used to build up a collection of types dynamically which we will later serialize (i.e. when writing PDBs). But often you just want to do some operation on a collection of types, and you may want to do the same operation on any kind of collection. For example, you might want to merge two TypeTableBuilders or you might want to merge two type streams that you loaded from various files. This dichotomy between reading and writing is responsible for a lot of the existing code duplication and overlapping responsibilities in the existing CodeView library classes. For example, after building up a TypeTableBuilder with a bunch of type records, if we want to dump it we have to re-invent a bunch of extra glue because our dumper takes a TypeDatabase or a CVTypeArray, which are both incompatible with TypeTableBuilder. This patch introduces an abstract base class called TypeCollection which is shared between the various type collection like things. Wherever we previously stored a TypeDatabase& in some common class, we now store a TypeCollection&. The advantage of this is that all the details of how the collection are implemented, such as lazy deserialization of partial type streams, is completely transparent and you can just treat any collection of types the same regardless of where it came from. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33293 llvm-svn: 303388
* [CodeView] Simplify the use of visiting type records & streams.Zachary Turner2017-05-171-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is often a lot of boilerplate code required to visit a type record or type stream. The #1 use case is that you have a sequence of bytes that represent one or more records, and you want to deserialize each one, switch on it, and call a callback with the deserialized record that the user can examine. Currently this requires at least 6 lines of code: codeview::TypeVisitorCallbackPipeline Pipeline; Pipeline.addCallbackToPipeline(Deserializer); Pipeline.addCallbackToPipeline(MyCallbacks); codeview::CVTypeVisitor Visitor(Pipeline); consumeError(Visitor.visitTypeRecord(Record)); With this patch, it becomes one line of code: consumeError(codeview::visitTypeRecord(Record, MyCallbacks)); This is done by having the deserialization happen internally inside of the visitTypeRecord function. Since this is occasionally not desirable, the function provides a 3rd parameter that can be used to change this behavior. Hopefully this can significantly reduce the barrier to entry to using the visitation infrastructure. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33245 llvm-svn: 303271
* [CodeView] Silence some -Wsign-compare warningsJustin Bogner2017-05-131-10/+10
| | | | llvm-svn: 302971
* [CodeView] Add a random access type visitor.Zachary Turner2017-05-123-0/+425
This adds a visitor that is capable of accessing type records randomly and caching intermediate results that it learns about during partial linear scans. This yields amortized O(1) access to a type stream even though type streams cannot normally be indexed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33009 llvm-svn: 302936
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud