| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
clang-format (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33932) to keep primary headers
at the top and handle new utility headers like 'gmock' consistently with
other utility headers.
No other change was made. I did no manual edits, all of this is
clang-format.
This should allow other changes to have more clear and focused diffs,
and is especially motivated by moving some headers into more focused
libraries.
llvm-svn: 304786
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
llvm-svn: 234679
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
class.
Without this, use of this copy ctor is deprecated in C++11 due to the
presence of a user-declared dtor.
Marking the class final is just a little extra security that there are
no further derived classes that may then end up using the intermediate
base class's copy assignment operator and cause slicing to occur.
I didn't bother marking the other (non-test) base class final, since it
has reference members so it won't have any implicit assignment operators
anyway. Open to ideas on that, though.
We probably want a warning about use of a slicing assignment operator,
then I wouldn't worry so much about marking the class as final.
llvm-svn: 231114
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
argument-dependent lookup can find it. This is another case where an
LLVM bug (not making operator<< visible) was masked by a GCC bug
(looking in the global namespace when it shouldn't).
llvm-svn: 92144
|
|
|
- This is a pretty slow / memory intensive implementation, and I will likely
change it to an iterative model, but it works.
llvm-svn: 90447
|
