| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can safely rely on a NoWrap add recurrence causing UB down the road
only if we know the loop does not have a exit expressed in a way that is
opaque to ScalarEvolution (e.g. by a function call that conditionally
calls exit(0)).
I believe with this change PR28012 is fixed.
Note: I had to change some llvm-lit tests in LoopReroll, since it looks
like they were depending on this incorrect behavior.
llvm-svn: 272237
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This fixes PR26682. Also add LCSSA as a preserved pass to LoopSimplify,
that looks correct to me and allows to write a test for the issue.
Reviewers: chandlerc, bogner, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21112
llvm-svn: 272224
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This fixes PR27617.
Bug description: The SLPVectorizer asserts on encountering GEPs with different index types, such as i8 and i64.
The patch includes a simple relaxation of the assert to allow constants being of different types, along with a regression test that will provoke the unrelaxed assert.
Reviewers: nadav, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: JesperAntonsson, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20685
Patch by Jesper Antonsson!
llvm-svn: 272206
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with user specified count has been applied.
Summary:
Previously SetLoopAlreadyUnrolled() set the disable pragma only if
there was some loop metadata.
Now it set the pragma in all cases. This helps to prevent multiple
unroll when -unroll-count=N is given.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20765
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 272195
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: iteratee
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21087
llvm-svn: 272192
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 272065
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
detection by handling loop-invariant case" (s couple of buildbots failed).
Patch by Roman Shirokiy.
llvm-svn: 272019
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes PR26314. This patch adds new helper “isNoWrap” with detection of
loop-invariant pointer case.
Patch by Roman Shirokiy.
Ref: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17268
llvm-svn: 272014
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
native shifts
Unlike native shifts, the AVX2 per-element shift instructions VPSRAV/VPSRLV/VPSLLV handle out of range shift values (logical shifts set the result to zero, arithmetic shifts splat the sign bit).
If the shift amount is constant we can sometimes convert these instructions to native shifts:
1 - if all shift amounts are in range then the conversion is trivial.
2 - out of range arithmetic shifts can be clamped to the (bitwidth - 1) (a legal shift amount) before conversion.
3 - logical shifts just return zero if all elements have out of range shift amounts.
In addition, UNDEF shift amounts are handled - either as an UNDEF shift amount in a native shift or as an UNDEF in the logical 'all out of range' zero constant special case for logical shifts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19675
llvm-svn: 271996
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for folding undef/zero/constant inputs to MOVMSK instructions.
The SSE/AVX versions can be fully folded, but the MMX version can only handle undef inputs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20998
llvm-svn: 271990
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
scalarizePHI only looked for phis that have exactly two uses - the "latch"
use, and an extract. Unfortunately, we can not assume all equivalent extracts
are CSE'd, since InstCombine itself may create an extract which is a duplicate
of an existing one. This extends it to handle several distinct extracts from
the same index.
This should fix at least some of the performance regressions from PR27988.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20983
llvm-svn: 271961
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In some cases, when simplifying with SCEV, we might consider pointer values as
just usual integer values. Thus, we might get a different type from what we
had originally in the map of simplified values, and hence we need to check
types before operating on the values.
This fixes PR28015.
llvm-svn: 271931
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Fix LSRInstance::HoistInsertPosition() to check the original insert
position block first for a canonical insertion point that is dominated
by all inputs. This leads to SCEV being able to reuse more instructions
since it currently tracks the instructions it creates for reuse by
keeping a table of <Value, insert point> pairs.
Originally reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D18001
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin, mcrosier
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18480
llvm-svn: 271929
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In r271810 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL271810 ), I loosened the check
above this to work for any Constant rather than ConstantInt. AFAICT,
that part makes sense if we can determine that the shrunken/extended
constant remained equal. But it doesn't make sense for this later
transform where we assume that the constant DID change.
This could assert for a ConstantExpr:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28011
And it could be wrong for a vector as shown in the added regression test.
llvm-svn: 271908
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271904
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271903
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This hasn't been caught before because it requires noalias or similarly
strong alias analysis to actually reproduce.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR27952 .
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20944
llvm-svn: 271858
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since FoldOpIntoPhi speculates the binary operation to potentially each
of the predecessors of the PHI node (pulling it out of arbitrary control
dependence in the process), we can FoldOpIntoPhi only if we know the
operation doesn't have UB.
This also brings up an interesting profitability question -- the way it
is written today, commonIRemTransforms will hoist out work from
dynamically dead code into code that will execute at runtime. Perhaps
that isn't the best canonicalization?
Fixes PR27968.
llvm-svn: 271857
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PHI case in commonIRemTransforms was untested; add a trivial test
case.
llvm-svn: 271856
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r154645 introduced this feature without test. This should have better
coverage now.
llvm-svn: 271853
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
There are some rough corners, since the new pass manager doesn't have
(as far as I can tell) LoopSimplify and LCSSA, so I've updated the
tests to run them separately in the old pass manager in the lit tests.
We also don't have an equivalent for AU.setPreservesCFG() in the new
pass manager, so I've left a FIXME.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc, davide
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20783
llvm-svn: 271846
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is an off-by-default option that no one seems to use[0], and given
that SCEV directly understands the overflow instrinsics there is no real
need for it anymore.
[0]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098181.html
llvm-svn: 271845
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
update_test_checks.py got confused matching the variable names.
llvm-svn: 271844
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271843
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271842
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271841
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271840
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271838
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271837
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271823
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A basic block could contain:
%cp = cleanuppad []
cleanupret from %cp unwind to caller
This basic block is empty and is thus a candidate for removal. However,
there can be other uses of %cp outside of this basic block. This is
only possible in unreachable blocks.
Make our transform more correct by checking that the pad has a single
user before removing the BB.
This fixes PR28005.
llvm-svn: 271816
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is step 1 of unknown towards fixing PR28001:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28001
llvm-svn: 271810
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271808
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271806
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271805
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Allows XOP to vectorize BITREVERSE - other targets will follow as their costmodels improve.
llvm-svn: 271803
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the MMX implementation to the SimplifyDemandedUseBits SSE/AVX MOVMSK support added in D19614
Requires a minor tweak as llvm.x86.mmx.pmovmskb takes a x86_mmx argument - so we have to be explicit about the implied v8i8 vector type.
llvm-svn: 271789
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was concern that creating bitcasts for the simpler potential select pattern:
define <2 x i64> @vecBitcastOp1(<4 x i1> %cmp, <2 x i64> %a) {
%a2 = add <2 x i64> %a, %a
%sext = sext <4 x i1> %cmp to <4 x i32>
%bc = bitcast <4 x i32> %sext to <2 x i64>
%and = and <2 x i64> %a2, %bc
ret <2 x i64> %and
}
might lead to worse code for some targets, so this patch is matching the larger
patterns seen in the test cases.
The motivating example for this patch is this IR produced via SSE intrinsics in C:
define <2 x i64> @gibson(<2 x i64> %a, <2 x i64> %b) {
%t0 = bitcast <2 x i64> %a to <4 x i32>
%t1 = bitcast <2 x i64> %b to <4 x i32>
%cmp = icmp sgt <4 x i32> %t0, %t1
%sext = sext <4 x i1> %cmp to <4 x i32>
%t2 = bitcast <4 x i32> %sext to <2 x i64>
%and = and <2 x i64> %t2, %a
%neg = xor <4 x i32> %sext, <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>
%neg2 = bitcast <4 x i32> %neg to <2 x i64>
%and2 = and <2 x i64> %neg2, %b
%or = or <2 x i64> %and, %and2
ret <2 x i64> %or
}
For an AVX target, this is currently:
vpcmpgtd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2
vpand %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
vpandn %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm1
vpor %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
retq
With this patch, it becomes:
vpmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20774
llvm-svn: 271676
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original tests were intended to show a missing transform that would
be solved by D20774:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20774
But it's not clear that the transform for the simpler tests is a win for
all targets. Make the tests show a larger pattern that should be a win
regardless of the cost of bitcast instructions.
llvm-svn: 271603
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is effectively a revert of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL249702 - [InstCombine] transform masking off of an FP sign bit into a fabs() intrinsic call (PR24886)
and:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL249701 - [ValueTracking] teach computeKnownBits that a fabs() clears sign bits
and a reimplementation as a DAG combine for targets that have IEEE754-compliant fabs/fneg instructions.
This is intended to resolve the objections raised on the dev list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098154.html
and:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24886#c4
In the interest of patch minimalism, I've only partly enabled AArch64. PowerPC, MIPS, x86 and others can enable later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19391
llvm-svn: 271573
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inline virtual functions has linkeonceodr linkage (emitted in comdat on
supporting targets). If the vtable for the class is not emitted in the
defining module, function won't be address taken thus its address is not
recorded. At the mercy of the linker, if the per-func prf_data from this
module (in comdat) is picked at link time, we will lose mapping from
function address to its hash val. This leads to missing icall promotion.
The second test case (currently disabled) in compiler_rt (r271528):
instrprof-icall-prom.test demostrates the bug. The first profile-use
subtest is fine due to linker order difference.
With this change, no missing icall targets is found in instrumented clang's
raw profile.
llvm-svn: 271532
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271467
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support for the new pass manager to MemorySSA pass.
Change MemorySSA to be computed eagerly upon construction.
Change MemorySSAWalker to be owned by the MemorySSA object that creates
it.
Reviewers: dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19664
llvm-svn: 271432
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 2d5d6493f43eb68493a3852b8c226ac9fafdc7eb.
llvm-svn: 271422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Taewook Oh
Summary: Patch for Bug 27478. Make BasicAliasAnalysis claims NoAlias if two GEPs index different fields of the same structure.
Reviewers: hfinkel, dberlin
Subscribers: dberlin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20665
llvm-svn: 271415
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, whenever we needed a vector IV, we would create it on the fly,
by splatting the scalar IV and adding a step vector. Instead, we can create a
real vector IV. This tends to save a couple of instructions per iteration.
This only changes the behavior for the most basic case - integer primary
IVs with a constant step.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20315
llvm-svn: 271410
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes bug https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27897.
When query memory access cost, current SLP always passes in alignment value of 1 (unaligned), so it gets a very high cost of scalar memory access, and wrongly vectorize memory loads in the test case.
It can be fixed by simply giving correct alignment.
llvm-svn: 271333
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The assumption, made in insert() that weak functions are always inserted after strong functions,
is only true in the first round of adding functions.
In subsequent rounds this is no longer guaranteed , because we might remove a strong function from the tree (because it's modified) and add it later,
where an equivalent weak function already exists in the tree.
This change removes the assert in insert() and explicitly enforces a weak->strong order.
This also removes the need of two separate loops in runOnModule().
llvm-svn: 271299
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If we can prove that an op.with.overflow intrinsic does not overflow, we
can get rid of the intrinsic, and replace it with non-wrapping
arithmetic.
This was first checked in at r265913 but reverted in r265950 because it
exposed some issues around how SCEV handled post-inc add recurrences.
Those issues have now been fixed.
Reviewers: atrick, regehr
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18685
llvm-svn: 271153
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR27315.
The post-inc version of an add recurrence needs to "follow the same
rules" as a normal add or subtract expression. Otherwise we miscompile
programs like
```
int main() {
int a = 0;
unsigned a_u = 0;
volatile long last_value;
do {
a_u += 3;
last_value = (long) ((int) a_u);
if (will_add_overflow(a, 3)) {
// Leave, and don't actually do the increment, so no UB.
printf("last_value = %ld\n", last_value);
exit(0);
}
a += 3;
} while (a != 46);
return 0;
}
```
This patch changes SCEV to put no-wrap flags on post-inc add recurrences
only when the poison from a potential overflow will go ahead to cause
undefined behavior.
To avoid regressing performance too much, I've assumed infinite loops
without side effects is undefined behavior to prove poison<->UB
equivalence in more cases. This isn't ideal, but is not new to LLVM as
a whole, and far better than the situation I'm trying to fix.
llvm-svn: 271151
|