summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopReroll/complex_reroll.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [LoopReroll] Rewrite induction variable rewriting.Eli Friedman2018-06-221-20/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This gets rid of a bunch of weird special cases; instead, just use SCEV rewriting for everything. In addition to being simpler, this fixes a bug where we would use the wrong stride in certain edge cases. The one bit I'm not quite sure about is the trip count handling, specifically the FIXME about overflow. In general, I think we need to widen the exit condition, but that's probably not profitable if the new type isn't legal, so we probably need a check somewhere. That said, I don't think I'm making the existing problem any worse. As a followup to this, a bunch of IV-related code in root-finding could be cleaned up; with SCEV-based rewriting, there isn't any reason to assume a loop will have exactly one or two PHI nodes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45191 llvm-svn: 335400
* Reroll loops with multiple IV and negative step part 3Lawrence Hu2016-04-301-0/+134
support multiple induction variables This patch enable loop reroll for the following case: for(int i=0; i<N; i += 2) { S += *a++; S += *a++; }; Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16550 llvm-svn: 268147
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud