summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/PartialInlineAlloca4.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""Eric Christopher2019-04-171-0/+70
| | | | | | | | The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory. Will be re-reverting again. llvm-svn: 358552
* Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."Eric Christopher2019-04-171-70/+0
| | | | | | | | As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton). This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda. llvm-svn: 358546
* [CodeExtractor] Do not lift lifetime.end markers for region inputsVedant Kumar2019-02-151-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a lifetime.end marker occurs along one path through the extraction region, but not another, then it's still incorrect to lift the marker, because there is some path through the extracted function which would ordinarily not reach the marker. If the call to the extracted function is in a loop, unrolling can cause inputs to the function to become optimized out as undef after the first iteration. To prevent incorrect stack slot merging in the calling function, it should be sufficient to lift lifetime.start markers for region inputs. I've tested this theory out by doing a stage2 check-all with randomized splitting enabled. This is a follow-up to r353973, and there's additional context for this change in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57834. rdar://47896986 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58253 llvm-svn: 354159
* [CodeExtractor] Do not extract unsafe lifetime markersVedant Kumar2019-01-041-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lifetime markers which reference inputs to the extraction region are not safe to extract. Example ('rhs' will be extracted): ``` entry: +------------+ | x = alloca | | y = alloca | +------------+ / \ lhs: rhs: +-------------------+ +-------------------+ | lifetime_start(x) | | lifetime_start(x) | | use(x) | | lifetime_start(y) | | lifetime_end(x) | | use(x, y) | | lifetime_start(y) | | lifetime_end(y) | | use(y) | | lifetime_end(x) | | lifetime_end(y) | +-------------------+ +-------------------+ ``` Prior to extraction, the stack coloring pass sees that the slots for 'x' and 'y' are in-use at the same time. After extraction, the coloring pass infers that 'x' and 'y' are *not* in-use concurrently, because markers from 'rhs' are no longer available to help decide otherwise. This leads to a miscompile, because the stack slots actually are in-use concurrently in the extracted function. Fix this by moving lifetime start/end markers for memory regions defined in the calling function around the call to the extracted function. Fixes llvm.org/PR39671 (rdar://45939472). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55967 llvm-svn: 350420
* [PartialInlining] Shrinkwrap allocas with live range contained in outline ↵Xinliang David Li2017-05-301-0/+67
region. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D33618 llvm-svn: 304245
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud