| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(PR26325)
The size savings are significant, and from what I can tell, both ICC and GCC do this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18573
llvm-svn: 264966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
x86-32: 32-bit calls were named "call" not "calll". 64-bit calls were correctly
named "callq", so this only impacted x86-32.
This fixes rdar://8456370 - llvm-mc rejects 'calll'
This also exposes that mingw/64 is generating a 32-bit call instead of a 64-bit call,
I will file a bugzilla.
llvm-svn: 114534
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 89584
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 81290
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from CC_X86_32_TailCall to CC_X86_32_FastCC.
llvm-svn: 56436
|
|
stack size. Add a test case.
llvm-svn: 56119
|