| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It adjusts from RSP-after-prologue to RBP, which is what SEH filters
need to do before they can use llvm.localrecover.
Fixes SEH filter captures, which were broken in r250088.
Issue reported by Alex Crichton.
llvm-svn: 255707
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SimplifyCFG allows tail merging with code which terminates in
unreachable which, in turn, makes it possible for an invoke to end up in
a funclet which it was not originally part of.
Using operand bundles on invokes allows us to determine whether or not
an invoke was part of a funclet in the source program.
Furthermore, it allows us to unambiguously answer questions about the
legality of inlining into call sites which the personality may have
trouble with.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15517
llvm-svn: 255674
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets.
The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests,
and will be deleted along with the old preparation.
llvm-svn: 249917
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang uses this for SEH finally. The new intrinsic will produce the
right value when stack realignment is required.
llvm-svn: 241643
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
WinEHPrepare works"
This reverts commit r235617.
r235649 should have addressed the problems.
llvm-svn: 235667
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
works"
We still have some "uses remain after removal" issues in -O0 builds.
This reverts commit r235557.
llvm-svn: 235617
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the -sehprepare flag and makes __C_specific_handler
functions always to use WinEHPrepare.
This was tested by building all of chromium_builder_tests and running a
few tests that use SEH, but if something breaks, we can revert this.
llvm-svn: 235557
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects
rely on it. This will make it easy to test this change with a simple
flag flip.
llvm-svn: 235399
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(http://crbug.com/477988)
llvm-svn: 235170
|
|
|
This now emits simple, unoptimized xdata tables for __C_specific_handler
based on the handlers listed in @llvm.eh.actions calls produced by
WinEHPrepare.
This adds support for running __finally blocks when exceptions are
thrown, and removes the old landingpad fan-in codepath.
I ran some manual execution tests on small basic test cases with and
without optimization, as well as on Chrome base_unittests, which uses a
small amount of SEH. I'm sure there are bugs, and we may need to
revert.
llvm-svn: 235154
|
