| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Negate updates flags like a subtract. We should be able to use the flags from the RMW form of negate when we have (store (X86ISD::SUB 0, load A), A)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60007
llvm-svn: 357353
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
flags are used. NFC
llvm-svn: 357300
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
There are transformation that change setcc into other constructs, and transform that try to reconstruct a setcc from the brcond condition. Depending on what order these transform are done, the end result differs.
Most of the time, it is preferable to get a setcc as a brcond argument (and this is why brcond try to recreate the setcc in the first place) so we ensure this is done every time by also doing it at the setcc level when the only user is a brcond.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, niravd, craig.topper
Subscribers: nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41235
llvm-svn: 325892
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cover the bitwise operators.
Nothing really exciting here, this just stamps out the rest of the core
operations that can RMW memory and set flags.
Still not implemented here: ADC, SBB. Those will require more
interesting logic to channel the flags *in*, and I'm not currently
planning to try to tackle that. It might be interesting for someone who
wants to improve our code generation for bignum implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37141
llvm-svn: 312768
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
operands and used flags to support matching immediate operands.
This is a bit trickier than register operands, and we still want to fall
back on a register operands even for things that appear to be
"immediates" when they won't actually select into the operation's
immediate operand. This also requires us to handle things like selecting
`sub` vs. `add` to minimize the number of bits needed to represent the
immediate, and picking the shortest immediate encoding. In order to
that, we in turn need to scan to make sure that CF isn't used as it will
get inverted.
The end result seems very nice though, and we're now generating
optimal instruction sequences for these patterns IMO.
A follow-up patch will further expand this to other operations with RMW
memory operands. But handing `add` and `sub` are useful starting points
to flesh out the machinery and make sure interesting and complex cases
can be handled.
Thanks to Craig Topper who provided a few fixes and improvements to this
patch in addition to the review!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37139
llvm-svn: 312764
|
|
|
to instructions.
These can't be reasonably matched in tablegen due to the handling of
flags, so we have to do this in C++ code. We only did it for `inc` and
`dec` historically, this starts fleshing that out to more interesting
instructions. Notably, this handles transfering operands to `add` and
`sub`.
Currently this forces them into a register. The next patch will add
support for keeping immediate operands as immediates. Then I'll extend
this beyond just `add` and `sub`.
I'm not super thrilled by the repeated switches in the code but
everything else I tried was really ugly or problematic.
Many thanks to Craig Topper for the suggestions about where to even
begin here and how to make this stuff work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37130
llvm-svn: 311806
|
