summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/mcm-12.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [PowerPC] Add a peephole post RA to transform the inst that fed by addQingShan Zhang2018-08-201-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | If the arch is P8, we will select XFLOAD to load the floating point, and then, expand it to vsx and non-vsx X-form instruction post RA. This patch is trying to convert the X-form to D-form if it meets the requirement that one operand of the x-form inst is the special Zero register, and another operand fed by add inst. i.e. y = add imm, reg LFDX. 0, y --> LFD imm(reg) Reviewers: Nemanjai Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49007 llvm-svn: 340149
* If the arch is P9, we will select the DFLOADf32/DFLOADf64 pseudo instruction ↵QingShan Zhang2018-06-191-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | when we are loading a floating, and expand it post RA basing on the register pressure. However, we miss to do the add-imm peephole for these pseudo instruction. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47568 Reviewed By: Nemanjai llvm-svn: 335024
* [PowerPC] Remove the match pattern in the definition of LXSDX/STXSDXLei Huang2018-05-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The match pattern in the definition of LXSDX is xoaddr, so the Pseudo instruction XFLOADf64 never gets selected. XFLOADf64 expands to LXSDX/LFDX post RA based on the register pressure. To avoid ambiguity, we need to remove the select pattern for LXSDX, same as what was done for LXSD. STXSDX also have the same issue. Patch by Qing Shan Zhang (steven.zhang). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47178 llvm-svn: 333150
* [Power9] Exploit D-Form VSX Scalar memory ops that target full VSX register setNemanja Ivanovic2016-10-041-2/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch corresponds to review: The newly added VSX D-Form (register + offset) memory ops target the upper half of the VSX register set. The existing ones target the lower half. In order to unify these and have the ability to target all the VSX registers using D-Form operations, this patch defines Pseudo-ops for the loads/stores which are expanded post-RA. The expansion then choses the correct opcode based on the register that was allocated for the operation. llvm-svn: 283212
* Adding -verify-machineinstrs option to PowerPC testsEhsan Amiri2016-08-031-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | Currently we have a number of tests that fail with -verify-machineinstrs. To detect this cases earlier we add the option to the testcases with the exception of tests that will currently fail with this option. PR 27456 keeps track of this failures. No code review, as discussed with Hal Finkel. llvm-svn: 277624
* [PPC] Adjust some PowerPC tests to account for presence/absence of VSXBill Schmidt2014-10-171-1/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | Patch by Bill Seurer; committed on his behalf. These test cases generate slightly different code sequences when VSX is activated and thus fail. The update turns off VSX explicitly for the existing checks and then adds a second set of checks for most of them that test the VSX instruction output. llvm-svn: 220019
* Convert CodeGen/*/*.ll tests to use the new CHECK-LABEL for easier ↵Stephen Lin2013-07-131-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | debugging. No functionality change and all tests pass after conversion. This was done with the following sed invocation to catch label lines demarking function boundaries: sed -i '' "s/^;\( *\)\([A-Z0-9_]*\):\( *\)test\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3test\4:\5/g" test/CodeGen/*/*.ll which was written conservatively to avoid false positives rather than false negatives. I scanned through all the changes and everything looks correct. llvm-svn: 186258
* PPCDAGToDAGISel::PostprocessISelDAG()Bill Schmidt2013-02-211-0/+18
This patch implements the PPCDAGToDAGISel::PostprocessISelDAG virtual method to perform post-selection peephole optimizations on the DAG representation. One optimization is implemented here: folds to clean up complex addressing expressions for thread-local storage and medium code model. It will also be useful for large code model sequences when those are added later. I originally thought about doing this on the MI representation prior to register assignment, but it's difficult to do effective global dead code elimination at that point. DCE is trivial on the DAG representation. A typical example of a candidate code sequence in assembly: addis 3, 2, globalvar@toc@ha addi 3, 3, globalvar@toc@l lwz 5, 0(3) When the final instruction is a load or store with an immediate offset of zero, the offset from the add-immediate can replace the zero, provided the relocation information is carried along: addis 3, 2, globalvar@toc@ha lwz 5, globalvar@toc@l(3) Since the addi can in general have multiple uses, we need to only delete the instruction when the last use is removed. llvm-svn: 175697
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud