| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests updated to explicitly use fast-isel at -O0 instead of implicitly.
This change also allows an explicit -fast-isel option to override an
implicitly enabled global-isel. Otherwise -fast-isel would have no effect at -O0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362
llvm-svn: 321655
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'this returns'
We mark X0 as preserved by a call that passes the returned parameter.
x0 = ...
fun(x0) // no implicit def of x0
This no longer is valid if we pass the parameter in a different register then
the returned value as is the case with a swiftself parameter (passed in x20).
x20 = ...
fun(x20) // there should be an implict def of x8
rdar://30425845
llvm-svn: 294527
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19007
llvm-svn: 266251
|
|
|
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17866
llvm-svn: 264754
|
