| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently fast-isel-abort will only abort for regular instructions,
and just warn for function calls, terminators, function arguments.
There is already fast-isel-abort-args but nothing for calls and
terminators.
This change turns the fast-isel-abort options into an integer option,
so that multiple levels of strictness can be defined.
This will help no being surprised when the "abort" option indeed does
not abort, and enables the possibility to write test that verifies
that no intrinsics are forgotten by fast-isel.
Reviewers: resistor, echristo
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7941
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 230775
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sign-/zero-extends.
The code already folds sign-/zero-extends, but only if they are arguments to
mul and shift instructions. This extends the code to also fold them when they
are direct inputs.
llvm-svn: 219187
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tiny enhancement to the address computation code to also fold sub instructions
if the rhs is constant and can be folded into the offset.
llvm-svn: 219186
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes an issue with sign-/zero-extending loads that was discovered
by Richard Barton.
We use now the correct load instructions for sign-extending loads to 64bit. Also
updated and added more unit tests.
llvm-svn: 219185
|
|
|
The sign-/zero-extension of the loaded value can be performed by the memory
instruction for free. If the result of the load has only one use and the use is
a sign-/zero-extend, then we emit the proper load instruction. The extend is
only a register copy and will be optimized away later on.
Other instructions that consume the sign-/zero-extended value are also made
aware of this fact, so they don't fold the extend too.
This fixes rdar://problem/18495928.
llvm-svn: 218653
|
