| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The LASTB and LASTA instructions extract the last active element,
or element after the last active, from the source vector.
The added variants are:
Scalar:
last(a|b) w0, p0, z0.b
last(a|b) w0, p0, z0.h
last(a|b) w0, p0, z0.s
last(a|b) x0, p0, z0.d
SIMD & FP Scalar:
last(a|b) b0, p0, z0.b
last(a|b) h0, p0, z0.h
last(a|b) s0, p0, z0.s
last(a|b) d0, p0, z0.d
The CLASTB and CLASTA conditionally extract the last or element after
the last active element from the source vector.
The added variants are:
Scalar:
clast(a|b) w0, p0, w0, z0.b
clast(a|b) w0, p0, w0, z0.h
clast(a|b) w0, p0, w0, z0.s
clast(a|b) x0, p0, x0, z0.d
SIMD & FP Scalar:
clast(a|b) b0, p0, b0, z0.b
clast(a|b) h0, p0, h0, z0.h
clast(a|b) s0, p0, s0, z0.s
clast(a|b) d0, p0, d0, z0.d
Vector:
clast(a|b) z0.b, p0, z0.b, z1.b
clast(a|b) z0.h, p0, z0.h, z1.h
clast(a|b) z0.s, p0, z0.s, z1.s
clast(a|b) z0.d, p0, z0.d, z1.d
Please refer to the architecture specification for more details on
the semantics of the added instructions.
llvm-svn: 336783
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48281
llvm-svn: 336782
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows us to use SelectionDAG::isKnownNeverZero in DAGCombiner::visitREM (visitSDIVLike/visitUDIVLike handle the checking for constants).
llvm-svn: 336779
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336777
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First stage in PR38057 - support non-uniform constant vectors in the combine to reuse the division-by-constant logic.
We can definitely do better for srem pow2 remainders (and avoid that extra multiply....) but this at least helps keep everything on the vector unit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48975
llvm-svn: 336774
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336773
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gcc 4.7 seems to disagree with gcc 5.3 about whether you need to say
'return std::move(thing)' instead of just 'return thing'. All the
json::Arrays and json::Objects that I was implicitly turning into
json::Values by returning them from functions now have explicit
std::move wrappers, so hopefully 4.7 will be happy now.
llvm-svn: 336772
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The aim of this backend is to output everything TableGen knows about
the record set, similarly to the default -print-records backend. But
where -print-records produces output in TableGen's input syntax
(convenient for humans to read), this backend produces it as
structured JSON data, which is convenient for loading into standard
scripting languages such as Python, in order to extract information
from the data set in an automated way.
The output data contains a JSON representation of the variable
definitions in output 'def' records, and a few pieces of metadata such
as which of those definitions are tagged with the 'field' prefix and
which defs are derived from which classes. It doesn't dump out
absolutely every piece of knowledge it _could_ produce, such as type
information and complicated arithmetic operator nodes in abstract
superclasses; the main aim is to allow consumers of this JSON dump to
essentially act as new backends, and backends don't generally need to
depend on that kind of data.
The new backend is implemented as an EmitJSON() function similar to
all of llvm-tblgen's other EmitFoo functions, except that it lives in
lib/TableGen instead of utils/TableGen on the basis that I'm expecting
to add it to clang-tblgen too in a future patch.
To test it, I've written a Python script that loads the JSON output
and tests properties of it based on comments in the .td source - more
or less like FileCheck, except that the CHECK: lines have Python
expressions after them instead of textual pattern matches.
Reviewers: nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arichardson, labath, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46054
llvm-svn: 336771
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes compile error in r336759. llvm::value::dump is not available
in released build.
llvm-svn: 336770
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These changes cover the PR#31399.
Now the ffs(x) function is lowered to (x != 0) ? llvm.cttz(x) + 1 : 0
and it corresponds to the following llvm code:
%cnt = tail call i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %v, i1 true)
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %v, 0
%.op = add nuw nsw i32 %cnt, 1
%add = select i1 %tobool, i32 0, i32 %.op
and x86 asm code:
bsfl %edi, %ecx
addl $1, %ecx
testl %edi, %edi
movl $0, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
In this case the 'test' instruction can't be eliminated because
the 'add' instruction modifies the EFLAGS, namely, ZF flag
that is set by the 'bsf' instruction when 'x' is zero.
We now produce the following code:
bsfl %edi, %ecx
movl $-1, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
addl $1, %eax
Patch by Ivan Kulagin
Reviewers: davide, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48765
llvm-svn: 336768
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch broke a few buildbots. I will investigate and re-apply when I have
a fix.
llvm-svn: 336767
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These patterns looked for a MOVSS/SD followed by a scalar_to_vector. Or a scalar_to_vector followed by a load.
In both cases we emitted a MOVSS/SD for the MOVSS/SD part, a REG_CLASS for the scalar_to_vector, and a MOVSS/SD for the load.
But we have patterns that do each of those 3 things individually so there's no reason to build large patterns.
Most of the test changes are just reorderings. The one test that had a meaningful change is pr30430.ll and it appears to be a regression. But its doing -O0 so I think it missed a lot of opportunities and was just getting lucky before.
llvm-svn: 336762
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
and fix a bug that these exposed.
llvm-svn: 336760
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35385
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48471
llvm-svn: 336759
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implement this as it is done on GCC:
__float128 a, b, c, d;
a = __builtin_fmaf128_round_to_odd (b, c, d); // generates xsmaddqpo
a = __builtin_fmaf128_round_to_odd (b, c, -d); // generates xsmsubqpo
a = - __builtin_fmaf128_round_to_odd (b, c, d); // generates xsnmaddqpo
a = - __builtin_fmaf128_round_to_odd (b, c, -d); // generates xsnmsubpqp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48218
llvm-svn: 336754
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original code attempted to do this, but the std::abs() call didn't
actually do anything due to implicit type conversions. Fix the type
conversions, and perform the correct check for negative immediates.
This probably has very little practical impact, but it's worth fixing
just to avoid confusion in the future, I think.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48907
llvm-svn: 336742
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
symbols in another VSO).
Also fixes a bug where chained aliases within a single VSO would deadlock on
materialization.
llvm-svn: 336741
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we don't include Initialization.h,
`LLVMInitializeAggressiveInstCombiner` won't see its `extern "C"` decl.
This causes sadness, name mangling, and linker errors.
Reported on the mailing lists by Vladimir Vissoultchev. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 336736
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some added 20 and some added 15. Its unclear when to use which value and whether they are required at all.
This patch removes them all. If we start finding real world issues we may need to add them back with proper tests.
llvm-svn: 336735
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
class -> struct in forward declaration.
llvm-svn: 336733
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BLEND under optsize when the immediate allows it.
Isel currently emits movss/movsd a lot of the time and an accidental double commute turns it into a blend.
Ideally we'd select blend directly in isel under optspeed and not rely on the double commute to create blend.
llvm-svn: 336731
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These ISD nodes try to select the MOVLPS and MOVLPD instructions which are special load only instructions. They load data and merge it into the lower 64-bits of an XMM register. They are logically equivalent to our MOVSD node plus a load.
There was only one place in X86ISelLowering that used MOVLPD and no places that selected MOVLPS. The one place that selected MOVLPD had to choose between it and MOVSD based on whether there was a load. But lowering is too early to tell if the load can really be folded. So in isel we have patterns that use MOVSD for MOVLPD if we can't find a load.
We also had patterns that select the MOVLPD instruction for a MOVSD if we can find a load, but didn't choose the MOVLPD ISD opcode for some reason.
So it seems better to just standardize on MOVSD ISD opcode and manage MOVSD vs MOVLPD instruction with isel patterns.
llvm-svn: 336728
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336722
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
I noticed that the .imports files emitted for distributed ThinLTO
backends do not have consistent ordering. This is because StringMap
iteration order is not guaranteed to be deterministic. Since we already
have a std::map with this information, used when emitting the individual
index files (ModuleToSummariesForIndex), use it for the imports files as
well.
This issue is likely causing some unnecessary rebuilds of the ThinLTO
backends in our distributed build system as the imports files are inputs
to those backends.
Reviewers: pcc, steven_wu, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48783
llvm-svn: 336721
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It points to an opcode that doesn't exist.
llvm-svn: 336720
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I believe isProfitableToFold will stop the load folding that this was intended to overcome.
Given an (xor load, -1), isProfitableToFold will see that the immediate can be folded with the xor using a one byte immediate since it can be sign extended. It doesn't know about NOT, but the one byte immediate check is enough to stop the fold.
llvm-svn: 336712
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
There were only 3 patterns with this node as a root and they all the same AddedComplexity. So this doesn't really do anything.
llvm-svn: 336711
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move all metadata construction into AMDGPUHSAMetadataStreamer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48176
llvm-svn: 336707
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The instruction selection is automatically handled by tablegen
llvm-svn: 336703
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes PR38120
llvm-svn: 336702
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
udiv x,-1 was going down the (slow) BuildUDIV route resulting in unnecessary shifts.
llvm-svn: 336701
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tables."
This reverts r336529 because an alternative approach turned out to be a
better fit for dsymuil.
llvm-svn: 336698
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
amdgpu-implicitarg-num-bytes attribute
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49096
llvm-svn: 336697
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This corresponds with the code for the single binop pattern
added in rL336684.
llvm-svn: 336696
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The llvm_gcov_... routines in compiler-rt are regular C functions that
need to be called using the proper C ABI for the target. The current
code simply calls them using plain LLVM IR types. Since the type are
mostly simple, this happens to just work on certain targets. But other
targets still need special handling; in particular, it may be necessary
to sign- or zero-extended sub-word values to comply with the ABI. This
caused gcov failures on SystemZ in particular.
Now the very same problem was already fixed for the llvm_profile_ calls
here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21736
This patch uses the same method to fix the llvm_gcov_ calls, in
particular calls to llvm_gcda_start_file, llvm_gcda_emit_function, and
llvm_gcda_emit_arcs.
Reviewed By: marco-c
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49134
llvm-svn: 336692
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When manually finishing the object writer in dsymutil, it's possible
that there are pending labels that haven't been resolved. This results
in an assertion when the assembler tries to fixup a label that doesn't
have an address yet.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49131
llvm-svn: 336688
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was originally intended with D48893, but as discussed there, we
have to make the folds safe from producing extra poison. This should
give the single binop folds the same capabilities as the existing
folds for 2-binops+shuffle.
LLVM binary opcode review: there are a total of 18 binops. There are 7
commutative binops (add, mul, and, or, xor, fadd, fmul) which we already
fold. We're able to fold 6 more opcodes with this patch (shl, lshr, ashr,
fdiv, udiv, sdiv). There are no folds for srem/urem/frem AFAIK. We don't
bother with sub/fsub with constant operand 1 because those are
canonicalized to add/fadd. 7 + 6 + 3 + 2 = 18.
llvm-svn: 336684
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
debug compilation dir when compiling assembly files with -g.
Part of PR38050.
Patch by Siddhartha Bagaria!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48988
llvm-svn: 336680
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336679
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for the following instructions:
CLS (Count Leading Sign bits)
CLZ (Count Leading Zeros)
CNT (Count non-zero bits)
CNOT (Logically invert boolean condition in vector)
NOT (Bitwise invert vector)
FABS (Floating-point absolute value)
FNEG (Floating-point negate)
All operations are predicated and unary, e.g.
clz z0.s, p0/m, z1.s
- CLS, CLZ, CNT, CNOT and NOT have variants for 8, 16, 32
and 64 bit elements.
- FABS and FNEG have variants for 16, 32 and 64 bit elements.
llvm-svn: 336677
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r336623
llvm-svn: 336675
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The case with 2 variables is more complicated than the case where
we eliminate the shuffle entirely because a shuffle with an undef
mask element creates an undef result.
I'm not aware of any current analysis/transform that recognizes that
undef propagating to a div/rem/shift, but we have to guard against
the possibility.
llvm-svn: 336668
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48968
llvm-svn: 336667
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recursive combining.
As suggested by @efriedma on D48975 use the visitSDIVLike/visitUDIVLike functions introduced at rL336656.
llvm-svn: 336664
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An explicit untied use is not sufficient to maintain liveness of a
register redefined in a predicated instruction. For example
%1 = COPY %0
...
%1 = A2_paddif %2, %1, 1
could become
$r1 = COPY $r0
...
$r1 = A2_paddif $p0, $r1, 1
and later
$r1 = COPY $r0 ;; this is not really dead!
...
$r1 = A2_paddif $p0, $r0, 1
llvm-svn: 336662
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Fixed two cases of where PHI nodes need to be updated by lowerswitch.
When lowerswitch find out that the switch default branch is not
reachable it remove the old default and replace it with the most
popular block from the cases, but it forget to update the PHI
nodes in the default block.
The PHI nodes also need to be updated when the switch is replaced
with a single branch.
Reviewers: hans, reames, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47203
llvm-svn: 336659
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parsing invalid UTF-8 input is now a parse error.
Creating JSON values from invalid UTF-8 now triggers an assertion, and
(in no-assert builds) substitutes the unicode replacement character.
Strings retrieved from json::Value are always valid UTF-8.
llvm-svn: 336657
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combines. NFCI.
As suggested by @efriedma on D48975, this patch separates the BuildDiv/Pow2 style optimizations from the rest of the visitSDIV/visitUDIV to make it easier to reuse the combines and will allow us to avoid some rather nasty node recursive combining in visitREM.
llvm-svn: 336656
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336647
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
switch unswitching.
The core problem was that the way we handled unswitching trivial exit
edges through the default successor of a switch. For some reason
I thought the right way to do this was to add a block containing
unreachable and point the default successor at this block. In
retrospect, this has an amazing number of problems.
The first issue is the one that this pass has always worked around -- we
have to *detect* such edges and avoid unswitching them again. This
seemed pretty easy really. You juts look for an edge to a block
containing unreachable. However, this pattern is woefully unsound. So
many things can break it. The amazing thing is that I found a test case
where *simple-loop-unswitch itself* breaks this! When we do
a *non-trivial* unswitch of a switch we will end up splitting this exit
edge. The result will be a default successor that is an exit and
terminates in ... a perfectly normal branch. So the first test case that
I started trying to fix is added to the nontrivial test cases. This is
a ridiculous example that did just amazing things previously. With just
unswitch, it would create 10+ copies of this stuff stamped out. But if
you combine it *just right* with a bunch of other passes (like
simplify-cfg, loop rotate, and some LICM) you can get it to do this
infinitely. Or at least, I never got it to finish. =[
This, in turn, uncovered another related issue. When we are manipulating
these switches after doing a trivial unswitch we never correctly updated
PHI nodes to reflect our edits. As soon as I started changing how these
edges were managed, it became obvious there were more issues that
I couldn't realistically leave unaddressed, so I wrote more test cases
around PHI updates here and ensured all of that works now.
And this, in turn, required some adjustment to how we collect and manage
the exit successor when it is the default successor. That showed a clear
bug where we failed to include it in our search for the outer-most loop
reached by an unswitched exit edge. This was actually already tested and
the test case didn't work. I (wrongly) thought that was due to SCEV
failing to analyze the switch. In fact, it was just a simple bug in the
code that skipped the default successor. While changing this, I handled
it correctly and have updated the test to reflect that we now get
precise SCEV analysis of trip counts for the outer loop in one of these
cases.
llvm-svn: 336646
|