| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141884
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Self-review easily caught this obvious bug.
llvm-svn: 141880
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141874
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
deeper issue was exposed.
llvm-svn: 141873
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This avoids unnecessary expansion of expressions and allows the SCEV
expander to work on expression DAGs, not just trees.
Fixes PR11090.
llvm-svn: 141870
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
just expression trees.
Partially fixes PR11090. Test case will be with the full fix.
llvm-svn: 141868
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141867
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Not having it confused assembly printing of jumptables.
llvm-svn: 141862
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
release the stack segment and reset the stack pointer. Place the code in its own
MBB to make the verifier happy.
llvm-svn: 141859
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-x86_64-linux/builds/101
--- Reverse-merging r141854 into '.':
U test/MC/Disassembler/X86/x86-32.txt
U test/MC/Disassembler/X86/simple-tests.txt
D test/CodeGen/X86/bmi.ll
U lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td
U lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
U lib/Target/X86/X86.td
U lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.h
llvm-svn: 141857
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
instruction verifier doesn't like this, nor do I.
llvm-svn: 141856
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141855
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
processor which is gcc's name for Haswell.
llvm-svn: 141854
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141853
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141851
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
have the same address as the one we deleted, and we don't want that in the set
yet. Noticed by inspection.
llvm-svn: 141849
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141844
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141842
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that MI->getRegClassConstraint() can also handle inline assembly,
don't bail when recomputing the register class of a virtual register
used by inline asm.
This fixes PR11078.
llvm-svn: 141836
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most instructions have some requirements for their register operands.
Usually, this is expressed as register class constraints in the
MCInstrDesc, but for inline assembly the constraints are encoded in the
flag words.
llvm-svn: 141835
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141834
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The inline asm operand constraint is initially encoded in the virtual
register for the operand, but that register class may change during
coalescing, and the original constraint is lost.
Encode the original register class as part of the flag word for each
inline asm operand. This makes it possible to recover the actual
constraint required by inline asm, just like we can for normal
instructions.
llvm-svn: 141833
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
our current machine instruction defines a register with the same register class
as what's being replaced. This showed up in the SPEC 403.gcc benchmark, where it
would ICE because a tail call was expecting one register class but was given
another. (The machine instruction verifier catches this situation.)
<rdar://problem/10270968>
llvm-svn: 141830
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
behavior. Based on patch by Ahmed Charles.
llvm-svn: 141829
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
not offsets from the section.
llvm-svn: 141828
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141824
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
to properly account for files with segment load commands that contain no sections.
llvm-svn: 141822
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on patch by Ahmed Charles.
llvm-svn: 141820
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The disassembler needs to use the AM5 factory methods instead of just
building up the immediate directly.
llvm-svn: 141819
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
behavior. Patch from Ahmed Charles.
llvm-svn: 141818
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Found by accident while reviewing a patch to nearby code.
llvm-svn: 141816
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141815
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for cpp pre-processed assembly we give correct filename and line numbers when
reporting errors in assembly files when using clang and -integrated-as on .s
files. rdar://8998895
llvm-svn: 141814
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
to investigate the regressions.
llvm-svn: 141813
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
rather than the previous index. If a block has a single instruction, the
previous index may be in a different basic block.
I have no clue how this used to work on all of test-suite, because now this
failure is seen quite often when trying to compile code with -strong-phi-elim.
This fixes PR10252.
llvm-svn: 141812
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141811
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141807
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141794
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141786
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141781
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141780
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
intended, but only by accident.
llvm-svn: 141779
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MC/ELF/many-section.s not to fail (on msvc).
DenseMap::lookup(k) would return "default constructor value" when k was not met. It would be useless when value type were POD.
llvm-svn: 141774
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
containing loop's header to see if that's a landing pad. If it is, then we don't
want to hoist instructions out of the loop and above the header.
llvm-svn: 141767
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141763
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141761
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove unused classes.
llvm-svn: 141757
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141750
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 141749
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. The speculation check may not have been performed if the BB hasn't had a load
LICM candidate.
2. If the candidate would be CSE'ed, then go ahead and speculatively LICM the
instruction even if it's in high register pressure situation.
llvm-svn: 141747
|