| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding nounwind deduction in new attributor framework.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63379
llvm-svn: 364521
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364482
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch introduces a new heuristic for guiding operand reordering. The new "look-ahead" heuristic can look beyond the immediate predecessors. This helps break ties when the immediate predecessors have identical opcodes (see lit test for an example).
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov, Ayal, hfinkel, rnk
Reviewed By: RKSimon, dtemirbulatov
Subscribers: rnk, rcorcs, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60897
llvm-svn: 364478
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This diff enables address sanitizer on Emscripten.
On Emscripten, real memory starts at the value passed to --global-base.
All memory before this is used as shadow memory, and thus the shadow mapping
function is simply dividing by 8.
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, sbc100
Reviewed By: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63742
llvm-svn: 364468
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364449
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364441
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
opt pipeline."
Breaks sanitizers:
libFuzzer :: cxxstring.test
libFuzzer :: memcmp.test
libFuzzer :: recommended-dictionary.test
libFuzzer :: strcmp.test
libFuzzer :: value-profile-mem.test
libFuzzer :: value-profile-strcmp.test
llvm-svn: 364416
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows later passes (in particular InstCombine) to optimize more
cases.
One that's important to us is `memcmp(p, q, constant) < 0` and memcmp(p, q, constant) > 0.
llvm-svn: 364412
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch generalizes the UnrollLoop utility to support loops that exit
from the header instead of the latch. Usually, LoopRotate would take care
of must of those cases, but in some cases (e.g. -Oz), LoopRotate does
not kick in.
Codesize impact looks relatively neutral on ARM64 with -Oz + LTO.
Program master patch diff
External/S.../CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII 629060.00 627676.00 -0.2%
External/SPEC/CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc 1245916.00 1244932.00 -0.1%
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator 86100.00 86156.00 0.1%
MultiSourc...arks/Rodinia/backprop/backprop 66212.00 66252.00 0.1%
MultiSourc...chmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life 67276.00 67312.00 0.1%
MultiSourc...s/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler 69824.00 69788.00 -0.1%
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler 86672.00 86696.00 0.0%
Reviewers: efriedma, vsk, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61962
llvm-svn: 364398
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-> icmp eq/ne (and %x, (lshr -C1, C2)), 0.
Simplify 'shl' inequality test into 'and' equality test.
This pattern happens in the middle-end while simplifying bitfield access,
Exposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63505
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/6uz
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: spatel, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63675
llvm-svn: 364348
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364346
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This follows up the transform from rL363956 to use the ctpop intrinsic when checking for power-of-2-or-zero.
This is matching the isPowerOf2() patterns used in PR42314:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
But there's at least 1 instcombine follow-up needed to match the alternate form:
(v & (v - 1)) == 0;
We should have all of the backend expansions handled with:
rL364319
(x86-specific changes still needed for optimal code based on subtarget)
And the larger patterns to exclude zero as a power-of-2 are joining with this change after:
rL364153 ( D63660 )
rL364246
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63777
llvm-svn: 364341
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: cloneLoopWithPreheader() currently only support innermost loop,
and assert otherwise.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, fhahn, kbarton
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63446
llvm-svn: 364310
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Split off from D60318.
llvm-svn: 364281
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
u</u>= (-C) earlier.
Summary:
To generate simplified IR, make sure fold
(X & ~C) ==/!= 0 --> X u</u>= C+1
is scheduled before fold
((X << Y) & C) == 0 -> (X & (C >> Y)) == 0.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/7ZN
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63505
llvm-svn: 364255
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the Demorgan'd 'not' of the pattern handled in:
D63660 / rL364153
This is another intermediate IR step towards solving PR42314:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
We can test if a value is not a power-of-2 using ctpop(X) > 1,
so combining that with an is-zero check of the input is the
same as testing if not exactly 1 bit is set:
(X == 0) || (ctpop(X) u> 1) --> ctpop(X) != 1
llvm-svn: 364246
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364237
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Alive says this is OK.
llvm-svn: 364235
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Alive says this is OK.
llvm-svn: 364234
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Alive says this is OK.
llvm-svn: 364233
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inference of nowrap flags in CVP has been disabled, because it
triggered a bug in LFTR (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31181).
This issue has been fixed in D60935, so we should be able to reenable
nowrap flag inference now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62776
llvm-svn: 364228
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63609
llvm-svn: 364219
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prefer the more exact intrinsic to remove a use of the input value
and possibly make further transforms easier (we will still need
to match patterns with funnel-shift of wider types as pieces of
bswap, especially if we want to canonicalize to funnel-shift with
constant shift amount). Discussed in D46760.
llvm-svn: 364187
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trunc(lshr) handling - if the shift is out of range (undefined) then bail like we do for non-constant shifts.
Fixes OSS Fuzz #15217
llvm-svn: 364181
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364159
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
In rL364135, I taught IndVars to fold exiting branches in loops with a zero backedge taken count (i.e. loops that only run one iteration). This extends that to eliminate the dead comparison left around.
llvm-svn: 364155
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is another intermediate IR step towards solving PR42314:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
We can test if a value is power-of-2-or-0 using ctpop(X) < 2,
so combining that with a non-zero check of the input is the
same as testing if exactly 1 bit is set:
(X != 0) && (ctpop(X) u< 2) --> ctpop(X) == 1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63660
llvm-svn: 364153
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This turned out to be surprisingly effective. I was originally doing this just for completeness sake, but it seems like there are a lot of cases where SCEV's exit count reasoning is stronger than it's isKnownPredicate reasoning.
Once this is in, I'm thinking about trying to build on the same infrastructure to eliminate provably untaken checks. There may be something generally interesting here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63618
llvm-svn: 364135
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364130
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364129
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r364084 (git commit 5698921be2d567f6abf925479ac9f5a376d6d74f)
It caused crashes while compiling a file in Chrome. Reduction
forthcoming.
llvm-svn: 364111
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The VM layout on iOS is not stable between releases. On 64-bit iOS and
its derivatives we use a dynamic shadow offset that enables ASan to
search for a valid location for the shadow heap on process launch rather
than hardcode it.
This commit extends that approach for 32-bit iOS plus derivatives and
their simulators.
rdar://50645192
rdar://51200372
rdar://51767702
Reviewed By: delcypher
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63586
llvm-svn: 364105
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduces a new heuristic for guiding operand reordering. The new "look-ahead" heuristic can look beyond the immediate predecessors. This helps break ties when the immediate predecessors have identical opcodes (see lit test for an example).
Committed on behalf of @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60897
llvm-svn: 364084
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
```
%a = sub i32 31, %x
%r = shl i32 1, %a
=>
%d = shl i32 1, 31
%r = lshr i32 %d, %x
Done: 1
Optimization is correct!
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/btZm
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, nikic
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63652
llvm-svn: 364073
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Signedness does not change number of trailing zeros.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, nikic
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63546
llvm-svn: 364064
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch based on suggestion by James Molloy (@jmolloy) in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42346
llvm-svn: 364062
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The motivation for this was to propagate fast-math flags like nnan and
ninf on vector floating point operations to the corresponding scalar
operations to take advantage of follow-on optimizations. But I think
the same argument applies to all of our IR flags: if they apply to the
vector operation then they also apply to all the individual scalar
operations, and they might enable follow-on optimizations.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63593
llvm-svn: 364051
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364006
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, add a FIXME for the unsafe transform on a unary FNeg. A unary FNeg can only be transformed to a FMul by -1.0 when the nnan flag is present. The unary FNeg project is a WIP, so the unsafe transformation is acceptable until that work is complete.
The bogus assert with introduced in D63445.
llvm-svn: 363998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, many profiling tests on Solaris FAIL like
Command Output (stderr):
--
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
__llvm_profile_register_names_function /tmp/lit_tmp_Nqu4eh/infinite_loop-9dc638.o
__llvm_profile_register_function /tmp/lit_tmp_Nqu4eh/infinite_loop-9dc638.o
Solaris 11.4 ld supports the non-standard GNU ld extension of adding
__start_SECNAME and __stop_SECNAME labels to sections whose names are valid
as C identifiers. Given that we already use Solaris 11.4-only features
like ld -z gnu-version-script-compat and fully working .preinit_array
support in compiler-rt, we don't need to worry about older versions of
Solaris ld.
The patch documents that support (although the comment in
lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling.cpp
(needsRuntimeRegistrationOfSectionRange) is quite cryptic what it's
actually about), and adapts the affected testcase not to expect the
alternativeq __llvm_profile_register_functions and __llvm_profile_init.
It fixes all affected tests.
Tested on amd64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41111
llvm-svn: 363984
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The getClobberingMemoryAccess API checks for clobbering accesses in a loop by walking the backedge. This may check if a memory access is being
clobbered by the loop in a previous iteration, depending how smart AA got over the course of the updates in MemorySSA (it does not occur when built from scratch).
If no clobbering access is found inside the loop, it will optimize to an access outside the loop. This however does not mean that access is safe to sink.
Given:
```
for i
load a[i]
store a[i]
```
The access corresponding to the load can be optimized to outside the loop, and the load can be hoisted. But it is incorrect to sink it.
In order to sink the load, we'd need to check no Def clobbers the Use in the same iteration. With this patch we currently restrict sinking to either
Defs not existing in the loop, or Defs preceding the load in the same block. An easy extension is to ensure the load (Use) post-dominates all Defs.
Caught by PR42294.
This issue also shed light on the converse problem: hoisting stores in this same scenario would be illegal. With this patch we restrict
hoisting of stores to the case when their corresponding Defs are dominating all Uses in the loop.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63582
llvm-svn: 363982
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I can't actually come up with a test case this triggers on without an out of tree change, but in theory, it's a bug in the recently added multiple exit LFTR support. The root issue is that an exiting block common to two loops can (in theory) have computable exit counts for both loops. Rewriting the exit of an inner loop in terms of the outer loops IV would cause the inner loop to either a) run forever, or b) terminate on the first iteration.
In practice, we appear to get lucky and not have the exit count computable for the outer loop, except when it's trivially zero. Given we bail on zero exit counts, we don't appear to ever trigger this. But I can't come up with a reason we *can't* compute an exit count for the outer loop on the common exiting block, so this may very well be triggering in some cases.
llvm-svn: 363964
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The form that compares against 0 is better because:
1. It removes a use of the input value.
2. It's the more standard form for this pattern: https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#DetermineIfPowerOf2
3. It results in equal or better codegen (tested with x86, AArch64, ARM, PowerPC, MIPS).
This is a root cause for PR42314, but probably doesn't completely answer the codegen request:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
Alive proof:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/9kG
Name: is power-of-2
%neg = sub i32 0, %x
%a = and i32 %neg, %x
%r = icmp eq i32 %a, %x
=>
%dec = add i32 %x, -1
%a2 = and i32 %dec, %x
%r = icmp eq i32 %a2, 0
Name: is not power-of-2
%neg = sub i32 0, %x
%a = and i32 %neg, %x
%r = icmp ne i32 %a, %x
=>
%dec = add i32 %x, -1
%a2 = and i32 %dec, %x
%r = icmp ne i32 %a2, 0
llvm-svn: 363956
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Signedness does not change number of trailing zeros.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63534
llvm-svn: 363951
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach IndVarSimply's LinearFunctionTestReplace transform to handle multiple exit loops. LFTR does two key things 1) it rewrites (all) exit tests in terms of a common IV potentially eliminating one in the process and 2) it moves any offset/indexing/f(i) style logic out of the loop.
This turns out to actually be pretty easy to implement. SCEV already has all the information we need to know what the backedge taken count is for each individual exit. (We use that when computing the BE taken count for the loop as a whole.) We basically just need to iterate through the exiting blocks and apply the existing logic with the exit specific BE taken count. (The previously landed NFC makes this super obvious.)
I chose to go ahead and apply this to all loop exits instead of only latch exits as originally proposed. After reviewing other passes, the only case I could find where LFTR form was harmful was LoopPredication. I've fixed the latch case, and guards aren't LFTRed anyways. We'll have some more work to do on the way towards widenable_conditions, but that's easily deferred.
I do want to note that I added one bit after the review. When running tests, I saw a new failure (no idea why didn't see previously) which pointed out LFTR can rewrite a constant condition back to a loop varying one. This was theoretically possible with a single exit, but the zero case covered it in practice. With multiple exits, we saw this happening in practice for the eliminate-comparison.ll test case because we'd compute a ExitCount for one of the exits which was guaranteed to never actually be reached. Since LFTR ran after simplifyAndExtend, we'd immediately turn around and undo the simplication work we'd just done. The solution seemed obvious, so I didn't bother with another round of review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62625
llvm-svn: 363883
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(Resumbit of r363292 which was reverted along w/an earlier patch)
llvm-svn: 363877
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Recommit of r363293 which was reverted when a dependent patch was.)
As pointed out by Nikita in D62625, BackedgeTakenCount is generally used to refer to the backedge taken count of the loop. A conditional backedge taken count - one which only applies if a particular exit is taken - is called a ExitCount in SCEV code, so be consistent here.
llvm-svn: 363875
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
To generate simplified IR, make sure fold
```
(X & signbit) ==/!= 0) -> X s>=/s< 0;
```
is scheduled before fold
```
((X << Y) & C) == 0 -> (X & (C >> Y)) == 0.
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/fbdh
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63026
llvm-svn: 363845
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62815
llvm-svn: 363814
|