|  | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | 
|---|
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | after trivial unswitching.
This PR illustrates that a fundamental analysis update was not performed
with the new loop unswitch. This update is also somewhat fundamental to
the core idea of the new loop unswitch -- we actually *update* the CFG
based on the unswitching. In order to do that, we need to update the
loop nest in addition to the domtree.
For some reason, when writing trivial unswitching, I thought that the
loop nest structure cannot be changed by the transformation. But the PR
helps illustrate that it clearly can. I've expanded this to a number of
different test cases that try to cover the different cases of this. When
we unswitch, we move an exit edge of a loop out of the loop. If this
exit edge changes which loop reached by an exit is the innermost loop,
it changes the parent of the loop. Essentially, this transformation may
hoist the inner loop up the nest. I've added the simple logic to handle
this reliably in the trivial unswitching case. This just requires
updating LoopInfo and rebuilding LCSSA on the impacted loops. In the
trivial case, we don't even need to handle dedicated exits because we're
only hoisting the one loop and we just split its preheader.
I've also ported all of these tests to non-trivial unswitching and
verified that the logic already there correctly handles the loop nest
updates necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48851
llvm-svn: 336477 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | It's a bit neater to write T.isIntOrPtrTy() over `T.isIntegerTy() ||
T.isPointerTy()`.
I used Python's re.sub with this regex to update users:
  r'([\w.\->()]+)isIntegerTy\(\)\s*\|\|\s*\1isPointerTy\(\)'
llvm-svn: 336462 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | The replaceAllDbgUsesWith utility helps passes preserve debug info when
replacing one value with another.
This improves upon the existing insertReplacementDbgValues API by:
- Updating debug intrinsics in-place, while preventing use-before-def of
  the replacement value.
- Falling back to salvageDebugInfo when a replacement can't be made.
- Moving the responsibiliy for rewriting llvm.dbg.* DIExpressions into
  common utility code.
Along with the API change, this teaches replaceAllDbgUsesWith how to
create DIExpressions for three basic integer and pointer conversions:
- The no-op conversion. Applies when the values have the same width, or
  have bit-for-bit compatible pointer representations.
- Truncation. Applies when the new value is wider than the old one.
- Zero/sign extension. Applies when the new value is narrower than the
  old one.
Testing:
- check-llvm, check-clang, a stage2 `-g -O3` build of clang,
  regression/unit testing.
- This resolves a number of mis-sized dbg.value diagnostics from
  Debugify.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48676
llvm-svn: 336451 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | LoopBlockNumber is a DenseMap<BasicBlock*, int>, comparing the result of
find() will compare a pair<BasicBlock*, int>. That's of course depending
on pointer ordering which varies from run to run. Reverse iteration
doesn't find this because we're copying to a vector first.
This bug has been there since 2016 but only recently showed up on clang
selfhost with FDO and ThinLTO, which is also why I didn't manage to get
a reasonable test case for this. Add an assert that would've caught
this.
llvm-svn: 336439 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | are done"
llvm-svn: 336410 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | There were a couple of issues reported (PR38047, PR37929) - I'll reland
the patch when I figure out and fix the rootcause.
llvm-svn: 336393 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Better NaN handling for AMDGCN fmed3.
All operands are checked for NaN now. The checks
were moved before the canonicalization to provide
a better mapping from fclamp. Changed the behaviour
of fmed3(x,y,NaN) to return max(x,y) instead of
min(x,y) in light of this. Updated tests as a result
and added some new cases to cover the fix.
Patch by Alan Baker
llvm-svn: 336375 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | from opcodes. NFCI.
This is an early step towards matching Instructions by attributes other than the opcode. This will be necessary for cast/call alternates which share the same opcode but have different types/intrinsicIDs etc. - which we could vectorize as long as we split them using the alternate mechanism.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48945
llvm-svn: 336344 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | independent FMA and extractelement/insertelement.
llvm-svn: 336315 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | We have bailout hacks based on min/max in various places in instcombine 
that shouldn't be necessary. The affected test was added for:
D48930 
...which is a consequence of the improvement in:
D48584 (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL336172)
I'm assuming the visitTrunc bailout in this patch was added specifically 
to avoid a change from SimplifyDemandedBits, so I'm just moving that 
below the EvaluateInDifferentType optimization. A narrow min/max is still
a min/max.
llvm-svn: 336293 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 336291 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | When creating `phi` instructions to resume at the scalar part of the loop,
copy the DebugLoc from the original phi over to the new one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48769
llvm-svn: 336256 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | When zext is EvaluatedInDifferentType, InstCombine
drops the dbg.value intrinsic. This patch tries to
preserve said DI, by inserting the zext's old DI in the
resulting instruction. (Only for integer type for now)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48331
llvm-svn: 336254 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This is the last significant change suggested in PR37806:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806#c5
...though there are several follow-ups noted in the code comments 
in this patch to complete this transform.
It's possible that a binop feeding a select-shuffle has been eliminated 
by earlier transforms (or the code was just written like this in the 1st 
place), so we'll fail to match the patterns that have 2 binops from: 
D48401, 
D48678, 
D48662, 
D48485.
In that case, we can try to materialize identity constants for the remaining
binop to fill in the "ghost" lanes of the vector (where we just want to pass 
through the original values of the source operand).
I added comments to ConstantExpr::getBinOpIdentity() to show planned follow-ups. 
For now, we only handle the 5 commutative integer binops (add/mul/and/or/xor).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48830
llvm-svn: 336196 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
When salvaging a dbg.declare/dbg.addr we should not add
DW_OP_stack_value to the DIExpression
(see test/Transforms/InstCombine/salvage-dbg-declare.ll).
Consider this example
  %vla = alloca i32, i64 2
  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %vla, metadata !1, metadata !DIExpression())
Instcombine will turn it into
  %vla1 = alloca [2 x i32]
  %vla1.sub = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %vla, i64 0, i64 0
  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata [2 x i32]* %vla1.sub, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression())
If the GEP can be eliminated, then the dbg.declare will be salvaged
and we should get
  %vla1 = alloca [2 x i32]
  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata [2 x i32]* %vla1, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression())
The problem was that salvageDebugInfo did not recognize dbg.declare
as being indirect (%vla1 points to the value, it does not hold the
value), so we incorrectly got
  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata [2 x i32]* %vla1, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_stack_value))
I also made sure that llvm::salvageDebugInfo and
DIExpression::prependOpcodes do not add DW_OP_stack_value to
the DIExpression in case no new operands are added to the
DIExpression. That way we avoid to, unneccessarily, turn a
register location expression into an implicit location expression
in some situations (see test11 in test/Transforms/LICM/sinking.ll).
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48837
llvm-svn: 336191 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | unswitching loops.
Original patch trying to address this was sent in D47624, but that
didn't quite handle things correctly. There are two key principles used
to select whether and how to invalidate SCEV-cached information about
loops:
1) We must invalidate any info SCEV has cached before unswitching as we
   may change (or destroy) the loop structure by the act of unswitching,
   and make it hard to recover everything we want to invalidate within
   SCEV.
2) We need to invalidate all of the loops whose CFGs are mutated by the
   unswitching. Notably, this isn't the *entire* loop nest, this is
   every loop contained by the outermost loop reached by an exit block
   relevant to the unswitch.
And we need to do this even when doing trivial unswitching.
I've added more focused tests that directly check that SCEV starts off
with imprecise information and after unswitching (and simplifying
instructions) re-querying SCEV will produce precise information. These
tests also specifically work to check that an *outer* loop's information
becomes precise.
However, the testing here is still a bit imperfect. Crafting test cases
that reliably fail to be analyzed by SCEV before unswitching and succeed
afterward proved ... very, very hard. It took me several hours and
careful work to build these, and I'm not optimistic about necessarily
coming up with more to cover more elaborate possibilities. Fortunately,
the code pattern we are testing here in the pass is really
straightforward and reliable.
Thanks to Max Kazantsev for the initial work on this as well as the
review, and to Hal Finkel for helping me talk through approaches to test
this stuff even if it didn't come to much.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47624
llvm-svn: 336183 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This patch changes order of transform in InstCombineCompares to avoid
performing transforms based on ranges which produce complex bit arithmetics
before more simple things (like folding with constants) are done. See PR37636
for the motivating example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48584
Reviewed By: spatel, lebedev.ri
llvm-svn: 336172 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 336133 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary: It is common to have the following min/max pattern during the intermediate stages of SLP since we only optimize at the end. This patch tries to catch such patterns and allow more vectorization.
         %1 = extractelement <2 x i32> %a, i32 0
         %2 = extractelement <2 x i32> %a, i32 1
         %cond = icmp sgt i32 %1, %2
         %3 = extractelement <2 x i32> %a, i32 0
         %4 = extractelement <2 x i32> %a, i32 1
         %select = select i1 %cond, i32 %3, i32 %4
Author: FarhanaAleen
Reviewed By: ABataev, RKSimon, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47608
llvm-svn: 336130 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | folding
This extends D48485 to allow another pair of binops (add/or) to be combined either
with or without a leading shuffle:
or X, C --> add X, C (when X and C have no common bits set)
Here, we need value tracking to determine that the 'or' can be reversed into an 'add',
and we've added general infrastructure to allow extending to other opcodes or moving 
to where other passes could use that functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48662
llvm-svn: 336128 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | getEntryCost
This code is only used by alternate opcodes so the InstructionsState has already confirmed that every Value is an Instruction, plus we use cast<Instruction> which will assert on failure.
llvm-svn: 336102 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | parameters.
This version contains a fix to add values for which the state in ParamState change
to the worklist if the state in ValueState did not change. To avoid adding the
same value multiple times, mergeInValue returns true, if it added the value to
the worklist. The value is added to the worklist depending on its state in
ValueState.
Original message:
For comparisons with parameters, we can use the ParamState lattice
elements which also provide constant range information. This improves
the code for PR33253 further and gets us closer to use
ValueLatticeElement for all values.
Also, as we are using the range information in the solver directly, we
do not need tryToReplaceWithConstantRange afterwards anymore.
Reviewers: dberlin, mssimpso, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: mssimpso
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43762
llvm-svn: 336098 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | handle SK_Select patterns.
We were always using the opcodes of the first 2 scalars for the costs of the alternate opcode + shuffle. This made sense when we used SK_Alternate and opcodes were guaranteed to be alternating, but this fails for the more general SK_Select case.
This fix exposes an issue demonstrated by the fmul_fdiv_v4f32_const test - the SLM model has v4f32 fdiv costs which are more than twice those of the f32 scalar cost, meaning that the cost model determines that the vectorization is not performant. Unfortunately it completely ignores the fact that the fdiv by a constant will be changed into a fmul by InstCombine for a much lower cost vectorization. But at least we're seeing this now...
llvm-svn: 336095 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | getEntryCost/vectorizeTree. NFCI.
Add assertions - we're already assuming this in how we use the AltOpcode and treat everything as BinaryOperators.
llvm-svn: 336092 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | instead of an opcode. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 336069 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | helper. NFCI.
This is a basic step towards matching more general instructions types than just opcodes.
llvm-svn: 336068 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 336063 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This is a simple implementation of the unroll-and-jam classical loop
optimisation.
The basic idea is that we take an outer loop of the form:
  for i..
    ForeBlocks(i)
    for j..
      SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
    AftBlocks(i)
Instead of doing normal inner or outer unrolling, we unroll as follows:
  for i... i+=2
    ForeBlocks(i)
    ForeBlocks(i+1)
    for j..
      SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
      SubLoopBlocks(i+1, j)
    AftBlocks(i)
    AftBlocks(i+1)
  Remainder Loop
So we have unrolled the outer loop, then jammed the two inner loops into
one. This can lead to a simpler inner loop if memory accesses can be shared
between the now jammed loops.
To do this we have to prove that this is all safe, both for the memory
accesses (using dependence analysis) and that ForeBlocks(i+1) can move before
AftBlocks(i) and SubLoopBlocks(i, j).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41953
llvm-svn: 336062 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Recommit of r335324 after buildbot failure fix
llvm-svn: 336059 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | and diretory.
Also cleans up all the associated naming to be consistent and removes
the public access to the pass ID which was unused in LLVM.
Also runs clang-format over parts that changed, which generally cleans
up a bunch of formatting.
This is in preparation for doing some internal cleanups to the pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47352
llvm-svn: 336028 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
Retagging allocas before returning from the function might help
detecting use after return bugs, but it does not work at all in real
life, when instrumented and non-instrumented code is intermixed.
Consider the following code:
F_non_instrumented() {
  T x;
  F1_instrumented(&x);
  ...
}
{
  F_instrumented();
  F_non_instrumented();
}
- F_instrumented call leaves the stack below the current sp tagged
  randomly for UAR detection
- F_non_instrumented allocates its own vars on that tagged stack,
  not generating any tags, that is the address of x has tag 0, but the
  shadow memory still contains tags left behind by F_instrumented on the
  previous step
- F1_instrumented verifies &x before using it and traps on tag mismatch,
  0 vs whatever tag was set by F_instrumented
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48664
llvm-svn: 336011 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This reverts r335996 which broke graph printing in Polly.
llvm-svn: 336000 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Extends the CFGPrinter and CallPrinter with heat colors based on heuristics or
profiling information. The colors are enabled by default and can be toggled
on/off for CFGPrinter by using the option -cfg-heat-colors for both
-dot-cfg[-only] and -view-cfg[-only].  Similarly, the colors can be toggled
on/off for CallPrinter by using the option -callgraph-heat-colors for both
-dot-callgraph and -view-callgraph.
Patch by Rodrigo Caetano Rocha!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40425
llvm-svn: 335996 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | (PR37806)
This was discussed in D48401 as another improvement for:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806
If we have 2 different variable values, then we shuffle (select) those lanes, 
shuffle (select) the constants, and then perform the binop. This eliminates a binop.
The new shuffle uses the same shuffle mask as the existing shuffle, so there's no 
danger of creating a difficult shuffle.
All of the earlier constraints still apply, but we also check for extra uses to 
avoid creating more instructions than we'll remove.
Additionally, we're disallowing the fold for div/rem because that could expose a
UB hole.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48678
llvm-svn: 335974 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | There's no way to expose this difference currently, 
but we should use the updated variable because the
original opcodes can go stale if we transform into
something new.
llvm-svn: 335920 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
The InlinerFunctionImportStats will collect and dump stats regarding how
many function inlined into the module were imported by ThinLTO.
Reviewers: wmi, dexonsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48729
llvm-svn: 335914 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | When rewriting an alloca partition copy the DL from the
old alloca over the the new one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48640
llvm-svn: 335904 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This is an enhancement to D48401 that was discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806
We can convert a shift-left-by-constant into a multiply (we canonicalize IR in the other 
direction because that's generally better of course). This allows us to remove the shuffle 
as we do in the regular opcodes-are-the-same cases.
This requires a small hack to make sure we don't introduce any extra poison:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZGv
Other examples of opcodes where this would work are add+sub and fadd+fsub, but we already 
canonicalize those subs into adds, so there's nothing to do for those cases AFAICT. There 
are planned enhancements for opcode transforms such or -> add.
Note that there's a different fold needed if we've already managed to simplify away a binop 
as seen in the test based on PR37806, but we manage to get that one case here because this 
fold is positioned above the demanded elements fold currently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48485
llvm-svn: 335888 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Frequency Info."
This reverts commits r335794 and r335797. Breaks ThinLTO+FDO selfhost.
llvm-svn: 335851 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary: Just a silly one-character correction.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48709
llvm-svn: 335832 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | SCCP does not change the CFG, so we can mark it as preserved.
Reviewers: dberlin, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47149
llvm-svn: 335820 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | If a trunc has a user in a block which is not reachable from entry,
we can safely perform trunc elimination as if this user didn't exist.
llvm-svn: 335816 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 335797 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | === Generating the CG Profile ===
The CGProfile module pass simply gets the block profile count for each BB and scans for call instructions.  For each call instruction it adds an edge from the current function to the called function with the current BB block profile count as the weight.
After scanning all the functions, it generates an appending module flag containing the data. The format looks like:
```
!llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
!0 = !{i32 5, !"CG Profile", !1}
!1 = !{!2, !3, !4} ; List of edges
!2 = !{void ()* @a, void ()* @b, i64 32} ; Edge from a to b with a weight of 32
!3 = !{void (i1)* @freq, void ()* @a, i64 11}
!4 = !{void (i1)* @freq, void ()* @b, i64 20}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48105
llvm-svn: 335794 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
Rather than just print the GUID, when it is available in the index,
print the global name as well in the function import thin link debug
messages. Names will be available when the combined index is being
built by the same process, e.g. a linker or "llvm-lto2 run".
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48612
llvm-svn: 335760 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | that don't take a mask as input to exclude '.mask.' from their name.
I think the intrinsics named 'avx512.mask.' should refer to the previous behavior of taking a mask argument in the intrinsic instead of using a 'select' or 'and' instruction in IR to accomplish the masking. This is more consistent with the goal that eventually we will have no intrinsics that have masking builtin. When we reach that goal, we should have no intrinsics named "avx512.mask".
llvm-svn: 335744 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This prevents InstCombine from creating mis-sized dbg.values when
replacing a sequence of casts with a simpler cast. For example, in:
  (fptrunc (floor (fpext X))) -> (floorf X)
We no longer emit dbg.value(X) (with a 32-bit float operand) to describe
(fpext X) (which is a 64-bit float).
This was diagnosed by the debugify check added in r335682.
llvm-svn: 335696 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Causes false positive ODR violation reports on __llvm_profile_raw_version.
llvm-svn: 335681 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
When recording uses we need to rewrite after cloning a loop we need to
check if the use is not dominated by the original def. The initial
assumption was that the cloned basic block will introduce a new path and
thus the original def will only dominate the use if they are in the same
BB, but as the reproducer from PR37745 shows it's not always the case.
This fixes PR37745.
Reviewers: haicheng, Ka-Ka
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48111
llvm-svn: 335675 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Failure URL:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-darwin13/builds/22836
llvm-svn: 335648 |