| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351945
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch relaxes restrictions on types of latch condition and range check.
In current implementation, they should match. This patch allows to handle
wide range checks against narrow condition. The motivating example is the
following:
int N = ...
for (long i = 0; (int) i < N; i++) {
if (i >= length) deopt;
}
In this patch, the option that enables this support is turned off by
default. We'll wait until it is switched to true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56837
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 351926
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Each hwasan check requires emitting a small piece of code like this:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html#memory-accesses
The problem with this is that these code blocks typically bloat code
size significantly.
An obvious solution is to outline these blocks of code. In fact, this
has already been implemented under the -hwasan-instrument-with-calls
flag. However, as currently implemented this has a number of problems:
- The functions use the same calling convention as regular C functions.
This means that the backend must spill all temporary registers as
required by the platform's C calling convention, even though the
check only needs two registers on the hot path.
- The functions take the address to be checked in a fixed register,
which increases register pressure.
Both of these factors can diminish the code size effect and increase
the performance hit of -hwasan-instrument-with-calls.
The solution that this patch implements is to involve the aarch64
backend in outlining the checks. An intrinsic and pseudo-instruction
are created to represent a hwasan check. The pseudo-instruction
is register allocated like any other instruction, and we allow the
register allocator to select almost any register for the address to
check. A particular combination of (register selection, type of check)
triggers the creation in the backend of a function to handle the check
for specifically that pair. The resulting functions are deduplicated by
the linker. The pseudo-instruction (really the function) is specified
to preserve all registers except for the registers that the AAPCS
specifies may be clobbered by a call.
To measure the code size and performance effect of this change, I
took a number of measurements using Chromium for Android on aarch64,
comparing a browser with inlined checks (the baseline) against a
browser with outlined checks.
Code size: Size of .text decreases from 243897420 to 171619972 bytes,
or a 30% decrease.
Performance: Using Chromium's blink_perf.layout microbenchmarks I
measured a median performance regression of 6.24%.
The fact that a perf/size tradeoff is evident here suggests that
we might want to make the new behaviour conditional on -Os/-Oz.
But for now I've enabled it unconditionally, my reasoning being that
hwasan users typically expect a relatively large perf hit, and ~6%
isn't really adding much. We may want to revisit this decision in
the future, though.
I also tried experimenting with varying the number of registers
selectable by the hwasan check pseudo-instruction (which would result
in fewer variants being created), on the hypothesis that creating
fewer variants of the function would expose another perf/size tradeoff
by reducing icache pressure from the check functions at the cost of
register pressure. Although I did observe a code size increase with
fewer registers, I did not observe a strong correlation between the
number of registers and the performance of the resulting browser on the
microbenchmarks, so I conclude that we might as well use ~all registers
to get the maximum code size improvement. My results are below:
Regs | .text size | Perf hit
-----+------------+---------
~all | 171619972 | 6.24%
16 | 171765192 | 7.03%
8 | 172917788 | 5.82%
4 | 177054016 | 6.89%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56954
llvm-svn: 351920
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The splitting pass does not need BFI unless the Module actually has a profile
summary. Do not calcualte BFI unless the summary is present.
For the sqlite3 amalgamation, this reduces time spent in the splitting pass
from 0.4% of the total to under 0.1%.
llvm-svn: 351894
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The splitting pass does not need (post)domtrees until after it's found a
cold block. Defer domtree calculation until a cold block is found.
For the sqlite3 amalgamation, this reduces time spent in the splitting
pass from 0.8% of the total to 0.4%.
llvm-svn: 351892
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is still causing compilation crashes in some targets. Will follow up shortly with a repro.
llvm-svn: 351845
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support of guards expressed as branches by widenable
conditions in Loop Predication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56081
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 351805
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351794
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deopt operands are generally intended to record information about a site in code with minimal perturbation of the surrounding code. Idiomatically, they also tend to appear down rare paths. Putting these together, we have an obvious case for extending CVP w/deopt operand constant folding. Arguably, we should be doing this for all operands on all instructions, but that's definitely a much larger and risky change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55678
llvm-svn: 351774
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36651, the specialization for
isPodLike<std::pair<...>> did not match the expectation of
std::is_trivially_copyable which makes the memcpy optimization invalid.
This patch renames the llvm::isPodLike trait into llvm::is_trivially_copyable.
Unfortunately std::is_trivially_copyable is not portable across compiler / STL
versions. So a portable version is provided too.
Note that the following specialization were invalid:
std::pair<T0, T1>
llvm::Optional<T>
Tests have been added to assert that former specialization are respected by the
standard usage of llvm::is_trivially_copyable, and that when a decent version
of std::is_trivially_copyable is available, llvm::is_trivially_copyable is
compared to std::is_trivially_copyable.
As of this patch, llvm::Optional is no longer considered trivially copyable,
even if T is. This is to be fixed in a later patch, as it has impact on a
long-running bug (see r347004)
Note that GCC warns about this UB, but this got silented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D50296.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54472
llvm-svn: 351701
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This causes a couple of changes in the upgrade tests as signed/unsigned eq/ne are equivalent and we constant fold true/false codes, these changes are the same as what we already do for avx512 cmp/ucmp.
Noticed while cleaning up vector integer comparison costs for PR40376.
llvm-svn: 351697
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351671
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Followup to D55745, this time handling comparisons with ugt and ult
predicates (which are the canonical forms for non-equality predicates).
For ctlz we can convert into a simple icmp, for cttz we can convert
into a mask check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56355
llvm-svn: 351645
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This modification of the currently unused inter-procedural constant
propagation pass (IPConstantPropagation) shows how abstract call sites
enable optimization of callback calls alongside direct and indirect
calls. Through minimal changes, mostly dealing with the partial mapping
of callbacks, inter-procedural constant propagation was enabled for
callbacks, e.g., OpenMP runtime calls or pthreads_create.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56447
llvm-svn: 351628
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Nikita Popov for pointing out this missed case.
This is a follow-up to r351411, which disabled function merging for
vararg functions outright due to a miscompile (see llvm.org/PR40345).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56865
llvm-svn: 351624
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an inherently cold function is found, mark it as cold. For now this
means applying the `cold` and `minsize` attributes.
As a drive-by, revisit and clean up the criteria for considering a
function for splitting. Add tests.
llvm-svn: 351623
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the begin/end iterator idiom to avoid visiting split functions,
instead of doing a set lookup.
llvm-svn: 351622
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CodeExtractor permits extracting a region of blocks from a function even
when values defined within the region are used outside of it.
This is typically done by creating an alloca in the original function
and reloading the alloca after a call to the extracted function.
Wrap the reload in lifetime start/end markers to promote stack coloring.
Suggested by Sergei Kachkov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56045
llvm-svn: 351621
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Scanning blocks in sub-loops for uses is unnecessary, as they were
already handled while dealing with the containing sub-loop.
This speeds up LCSSA for highly nested loops. For the test case in PR37202, it
halves the time spent in LCSSA. In cases were we won't be able to skip
any blocks, the additional lookup should be negligible.
Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:
Total Execution Time: 48.5505 seconds (48.5511 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- --- Name ---
10.0822 ( 21.0%) 0.1406 ( 27.0%) 10.2228 ( 21.1%) 10.2228 ( 21.1%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
10.0417 ( 20.9%) 0.1467 ( 28.2%) 10.1884 ( 21.0%) 10.1890 ( 21.0%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
4.2703 ( 8.9%) 0.0040 ( 0.8%) 4.2742 ( 8.8%) 4.2742 ( 8.8%) Unswitch loops
2.7376 ( 5.7%) 0.0229 ( 4.4%) 2.7605 ( 5.7%) 2.7611 ( 5.7%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
2.7332 ( 5.7%) 0.0214 ( 4.1%) 2.7546 ( 5.7%) 2.7546 ( 5.7%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3
2.7088 ( 5.6%) 0.0230 ( 4.4%) 2.7319 ( 5.6%) 2.7324 ( 5.6%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
2.6855 ( 5.6%) 0.0236 ( 4.5%) 2.7091 ( 5.6%) 2.7090 ( 5.6%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
2.1648 ( 4.5%) 0.0018 ( 0.4%) 2.1666 ( 4.5%) 2.1664 ( 4.5%) Unroll loops
1.8371 ( 3.8%) 0.0009 ( 0.2%) 1.8379 ( 3.8%) 1.8380 ( 3.8%) Value Propagation
1.8149 ( 3.8%) 0.0021 ( 0.4%) 1.8170 ( 3.7%) 1.8169 ( 3.7%) Loop Invariant Code Motion
1.6755 ( 3.5%) 0.0226 ( 4.3%) 1.6981 ( 3.5%) 1.6980 ( 3.5%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #7
Time-passes with this patch
Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- --- Name ---
5.2786 ( 17.7%) 0.0021 ( 1.2%) 5.2806 ( 17.6%) 5.2808 ( 17.6%) Unswitch loops
4.3739 ( 14.7%) 0.0303 ( 18.1%) 4.4042 ( 14.7%) 4.4042 ( 14.7%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
4.2658 ( 14.3%) 0.0192 ( 11.5%) 4.2850 ( 14.3%) 4.2851 ( 14.3%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
2.2307 ( 7.5%) 0.0013 ( 0.8%) 2.2320 ( 7.5%) 2.2318 ( 7.5%) Loop Invariant Code Motion
2.0888 ( 7.0%) 0.0012 ( 0.7%) 2.0900 ( 7.0%) 2.0897 ( 7.0%) Unroll loops
1.6761 ( 5.6%) 0.0013 ( 0.8%) 1.6774 ( 5.6%) 1.6774 ( 5.6%) Value Propagation
1.3686 ( 4.6%) 0.0029 ( 1.8%) 1.3716 ( 4.6%) 1.3714 ( 4.6%) Induction Variable Simplification
1.1457 ( 3.8%) 0.0010 ( 0.6%) 1.1468 ( 3.8%) 1.1468 ( 3.8%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
1.1384 ( 3.8%) 0.0005 ( 0.3%) 1.1389 ( 3.8%) 1.1389 ( 3.8%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
1.1360 ( 3.8%) 0.0027 ( 1.6%) 1.1387 ( 3.8%) 1.1387 ( 3.8%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
1.1331 ( 3.8%) 0.0010 ( 0.6%) 1.1341 ( 3.8%) 1.1340 ( 3.8%) Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mzolotukhin
Reviewed By: davide, efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56848
llvm-svn: 351567
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351520
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior to r348205, extracting code regions with live output values was
disabled because of a miscompilation (PR39433). Lift the restriction as
PR39433 has been addressed.
Tested on LNT+externals, on a run of check-llvm in a stage2 build, and
with a full build of iOS (with hot/cold splitting enabled).
As a drive-by, remove an errant TODO.
llvm-svn: 351492
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resuming exception unwinding is roughly as unlikely as throwing an
exception.
Tested on LNT+externals (in particular, the C++ EH regression tests
provide end-to-end test coverage), as well as with a full build of iOS.
llvm-svn: 351491
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Relaxing this requirement creates opportunities to split code dominated
by an EH pad.
Tested on LNT+externals.
llvm-svn: 351483
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gets rid of the brittle/mysterious calls to @sink()/@sideeffect()
peppered throughout the test cases. They are no longer needed to force
splitting to occur.
llvm-svn: 351480
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the sample profile has no inlining hierachy information included, we call
the sample profile is flattened. For flattened profile, in ThinLTO postlink
phase, SampleProfileLoader's hot function inlining and profile annotation will
do nothing, so it is better to save the effort to read in the profile and run
the sample profile loader pass. It is helpful for reducing compile time when
the flattened profile is huge.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54819
llvm-svn: 351476
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
InstCombine's sinking algorithm only thinks about memory. It doesn't
think about non-memory constraints like stack object lifetime. It can
sink dynamic allocas across a stacksave call, which may be used with
stackrestore, which can incorrectly reduce the lifetime of the dynamic
alloca.
Fixes PR40365
Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56872
llvm-svn: 351475
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mistaken commit of something still under review!
This reverts commit r351453.
llvm-svn: 351455
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).
Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.
The index-based WPD will be sent as a follow-on.
Depends on D53890.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815
llvm-svn: 351453
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During the transforms in LoopSimplifyCFG, when we remove a dead exiting edge, the
parent loop may stop being reachable from the child loop, and therefore they become
siblings. If the former child loop had uses of some values from its former parent loop,
now such uses will require LCSSA Phis, even if they weren't needed before. So we must
form LCSSA for all loops that stopped being ancestors of the current loop in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56144
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 351434
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Function `DeleteDeadBlock` requires that all predecessors of a block
being deleted have already been deleted, with the exception of a
single-block loop. When we use it for removal of dead subloops that
contain more than one block, we may not fulfull this requirement and
fail an assertion.
This patch replaces invocation of `DeleteDeadBlock` with a generalized
version `DeleteDeadBlocks` that is able to deal with multiple dead blocks,
even if they contain some cycles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56121
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 351433
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351416
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The function merging pass miscompiles identical vararg functions. The
forwarding thunk it emits doesn't forward the full variable-length list
of arguments. Disable merging for vararg functions for now.
I've filed llvm.org/PR40345 to track the issue.
rdar://47326238
llvm-svn: 351411
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Essentially, do not treat `call` and `musttail call` as the same thing.
As a drive-by, fold CallInst and InvokeInst handling together using the
CallSite helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56815
llvm-svn: 351405
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
PGOInstrGen should be initialized to "" instead of false.
llvm-svn: 351397
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we have pgo options defined in PassManagerBuilder.cpp only for
instrument pgo, but not for sample pgo. We also have pgo options defined
in NewPMDriver.cpp in opt only for new pass manager and for all kinds of
pgo. They have some inconsistency.
To make the options more consistent and make tests writing easier, the
patch let old pass manager to share the same pgo options with new pass
manager in opt, and removes the options in PassManagerBuilder.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56749
llvm-svn: 351392
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Sometimes the SLP vectorizer tries to vectorize the horizontal reduction
nodes during regular vectorization. This may happen inside of the loops,
when there are some vectorizable PHIs. Patch fixes this by checking if
the node is the reduction node and thus it must not be vectorized, it must
be gathered.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, hfinkel, fedor.sergeev
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56783
llvm-svn: 351349
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For the given test SROA detects possible replacement and creates a correct alloca. After that SROA is adding lifetime markers for this new alloca. The function getNewAllocaSlicePtr is trying to deduce the pointer type based on the original alloca, which is split, to use it later in lifetime intrinsic.
For the test we ended up with such code (rA is initial alloca [10 x float], which is split, and rA.sroa.0.0 is a new split allocation)
```
%rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast = bitcast i32* %rA.sroa.0 to [10 x float]* <----- this one causing the assertion and is an extra bitcast
%5 = bitcast [10 x float]* %rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast to i8*
call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 4, i8* %5)
```
isAllocaPromotable code assumes that a user of alloca may go into lifetime marker through bitcast but it must be the only one bitcast to i8* type. In the test it's not a i8* type, return false and throw the assertion.
As we are creating a pointer, which will be used in lifetime markers only, the proposed fix is to create a bitcast to i8* immediately to avoid extra bitcast creation.
The test is a greatly simplified to just reproduce the assertion.
Author: Igor Tsimbalist <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55934
llvm-svn: 351325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: To avoid adding an extern function to the global ctors list, apply the changes of D56538 also to MSan.
Reviewers: chandlerc, vitalybuka, fedor.sergeev, leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56734
llvm-svn: 351322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Second iteration of D56433 which got reverted in rL350719. The problem
in the previous version was that we dropped the thunk calling the tsan init
function. The new version keeps the thunk which should appease dyld, but is not
actually OK wrt. the current semantics of function passes. Hence, add a
helper to insert the functions only on the first time. The helper
allows hooking into the insertion to be able to append them to the
global ctors list.
Reviewers: chandlerc, vitalybuka, fedor.sergeev, leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56538
llvm-svn: 351314
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Check to make sure that the caller and the callee have compatible
function arguments before promoting arguments. This uses the same
TargetTransformInfo queries that are used to determine if attributes
are compatible for inlining.
The goal here is to avoid breaking ABI when a called function's ABI
depends on a target feature that is not enabled in the caller.
This is a very conservative fix for PR37358. Ideally we would have a more
sophisticated check for ABI compatiblity rather than checking if the
attributes are compatible for inlining.
Reviewers: echristo, chandlerc, eli.friedman, craig.topper
Reviewed By: echristo, chandlerc
Subscribers: nikic, xbolva00, rkruppe, alexcrichton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53554
llvm-svn: 351296
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
InstCombine is able to transform mem transfer instrinsic to alone store or store/load pair.
It might result in generation of unaligned atomic load/store which later in backend
will be transformed to libcall. It is not an evident gain and it is better to keep intrinsic as is
and handle it at backend.
Reviewers: reames, anna, apilipenko, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56582
llvm-svn: 351295
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
InvokeInst should be treated like CallInst and
assigned a separate discriminator. This is particularly
import when an Invoke is converted to a Call
during compilation and so can invalidate sample profile
data collected wtih different link time optimizations
Reviewers: twoh, Kader, danielcdh, wmi
Reviewed By: wmi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56491
llvm-svn: 351251
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Comdat groups override weak symbol behavior, allowing the linker to keep
the comdats for weak symbols in favor of comdats for strong symbols.
Fixes the issue described in:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=918662
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc, rnk
Reviewed By: pcc, rnk
Subscribers: smeenai, rnk, bd1976llvm, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56516
llvm-svn: 351247
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
debug location to its function summary.
Summary:
Here are timings (as reported by "opt -time-passes") for
sample-profile pass for some files holding hot functions from a major
service©r. Average 17% reduction. Delta column is 100*(old-new)/old.
```
Old New Delta
0.0537 0.0538 -0.2%
0.8155 0.6522 20.0%
0.0779 0.0751 3.6%
0.0727 0.0913 -25.6%
0.1622 0.1302 19.7%
0.0627 0.0594 5.3%
0.0766 0.0744 2.9%
0.6426 0.4387 31.7%
0.3521 0.2776 21.2%
0.3549 0.2721 23.3%
0.0912 0.0904 0.9%
0.1236 0.1059 14.3%
0.0854 0.0866 -1.4%
0.0757 0.0722 4.6%
0.1293 0.1147 11.3%
0.1354 0.1122 17.1%
0.0767 0.0770 -0.4%
0.1135 0.0968 14.7%
0.0524 0.0608 -16.0%
0.1279 0.1106 13.5%
==========
3.6820 3.0520 17.1% Total
```
Reviewers: twoh, Kader, danielcdh, wmi
Reviewed By: wmi
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56435
llvm-svn: 351211
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Increment statistics counter NumSwitches at unswitchNontrivialInvariants() for
unswitching a non-trivial switch instruction. This is to fix a bug that it
increments NumBranches even for the case of switch instruction.
There is no functional change in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56408
llvm-svn: 351193
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise instcombine gets stuck in a cycle. The canonicalization was
added in D55961.
This patch fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=12400
llvm-svn: 351187
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351185
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351183
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 351180
|
