| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch enables small size reductions in which the source types are smaller
than the reduction type (e.g., computing an i16 sum from the values in an i8
array). The previous behavior was to only allow small size reductions if the
source types and reduction type were the same. The change accounts for the fact
that the existing sign- and zero-extend instructions in these cases should
still be included in the cost model.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12770
llvm-svn: 247337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change correctly sets the attributes on the callsites
generated in thunks. This makes sure things such as sret, sext, etc.
are correctly set, so that the call can be a proper tailcall.
Also, the transfer of attributes in the replaceDirectCallers function
appears to be unnecessary, but until this is confirmed it will remain.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: dschuff, jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, nlewycky
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12581
llvm-svn: 247313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow up to http://reviews.llvm.org/D11995 implementing the suggestion by Hans.
If we know some of the bits of the value being switched on, we know that the maximum number of unique cases covers the unknown bits. This allows to eliminate switch defaults for large integers (i32) when most bits in the value are known.
Note that I had to make the transform contingent on not having any dead cases. This is conservatively correct with the old code, but required for the new code since we might have a dead case which varies one of the known bits. Counting that towards our number of covering cases would be bad. If we do have dead cases, we'll eliminate them first, then revisit the possibly dead default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12497
llvm-svn: 247309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes"
Except the changes that defined virtual destructors as =default, because that
ran into problems with GCC 4.7 and overriding methods that weren't noexcept.
llvm-svn: 247298
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247295
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247294
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247293
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
removes cast by performing the lshr on smaller types. However, currently there
is no trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst) variant.
This patch add such optimization by transforming trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst)
to ashr A, Cst.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12520
llvm-svn: 247271
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This can give significant improvements to alias analysis in some situations, and improves its testing coverage in all situations.
llvm-svn: 247264
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GlobalsAA must by definition be preserved in function passes, but the passmanager doesn't know that. Make each pass explicitly preserve GlobalsAA.
llvm-svn: 247263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This caused build breakges, e.g.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75/builds/24926
llvm-svn: 247226
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247223
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The assertion was weaker than it should be and gave the impression we're growing the number of base defining values being considered during the fixed point interation. That's not true. The tighter form of the assert is useful documentation.
llvm-svn: 247221
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247220
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Eugene Zelenko!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12740
llvm-svn: 247216
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247213
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Factor out common code related to naming values, fix a small style issue. More to follow in separate changes.
llvm-svn: 247211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change is simply enhancing the existing inference algorithm to handle insertelement instructions by conservatively inserting a new instruction to propagate the vector of associated base pointers. In the process, I'm ripping out the peephole optimizations which mostly helped cover the fact this hadn't been done.
Note that most of the newly inserted nodes will be nearly immediately removed by the post insertion optimization pass introduced in 246718. Arguably, we should be trying harder to avoid the malloc traffic here, but I'd rather get the code correct, then worry about compile time.
Unlike previous extensions of the algorithm to handle more case, I discovered the existing code was causing miscompiles in some cases. In particular, we had an implicit assumption that the peephole covered *all* insert element instructions, so if we had a value directly based on a insert element the peephole didn't cover, we proceeded as if it were a base anyways. Not good. I believe we had the same issue with shufflevector which is why I adjusted the predicate for them as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583
llvm-svn: 247210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the base pointer algorithm wasn't deterministic. The core fixed point was (of course), but we were inserting new nodes and optimizing them in an order which was unspecified and variable. We'd somewhat hacked around this for testing by sorting by value name, but that doesn't solve the general determinism problem.
Instead, we can use the order of traversal over the def/use graph to give us a single consistent ordering. Today, this is a DFS order, but the exact order doesn't mater provided it's deterministic for a given input.
(Q: It is safe to rely on a deterministic order of operands right?)
Note that this only fixes the determinism within a single inference step. The inference step is currently invoked many times in a non-deterministic order. That's a future change in the sequence. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12640
llvm-svn: 247208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Visit disjoint sets in a deterministic order based on the maximum BitSetNM
index, otherwise the order in which we visit them will depend on pointer
comparisons. This was being exposed by MSan.
llvm-svn: 247201
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r246997, it introduced a regression (PR24763).
llvm-svn: 247180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups.
This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for
LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass
manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is
as follows:
- FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation
interface to walk a single query across a range of results from
different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we
always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function.
- AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of
various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several
cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can
be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than
the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be
hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause
a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the
behavior of the prior infrastructure.
- All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the
legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared
result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely
naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the
new pass manager.
- BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more
fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and
loop info that need to be constructed for each function.
All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been
updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and
other pass management code has been updated accordingly.
The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the
available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object.
This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various
passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA
passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded
into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to
be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As
a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on
BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation.
This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally,
most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass
because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes.
The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve
all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up
needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the
aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass.
Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving
that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided
alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA,
GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is
preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is
marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved
set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and
I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve
SCEV itself.
One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were
actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of
a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis
management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many
cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more
obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new
PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias
analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them.
This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and
is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state.
Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old
alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most
significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass
relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the
analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing
functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included
that in this patch merely to keep it smaller.
Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA
documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the
new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in
the new pass manager first.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080
llvm-svn: 247167
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247154
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247150
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247148
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We called a variable ExitCount, stored the backedge count in it, then redefined it to be the exit count again.
llvm-svn: 247140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Predicating stores requires creating extra blocks. It's much cleaner if we do this in one pass instead of mutating the CFG while writing vector instructions.
Besides which we can make use of helper functions to update domtree for us, reducing the work we need to do.
llvm-svn: 247139
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
nothing broke.
llvm-svn: 247127
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
IRCE was just using INITIALIZE_PASS(), which is incorrect.
llvm-svn: 247122
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247095
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
members." as it causes test failures on a number of bots.
llvm-svn: 247088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change extends the bitset lowering pass to support bitsets that may
contain either functions or global variables. A function bitset is lowered to
a jump table that is laid out before one of the functions in the bitset.
Also add support for non-string bitset identifier names. This allows for
distinct metadata nodes to stand in for names with internal linkage,
as done in D11857.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11856
llvm-svn: 247080
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247061
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
removes cast by performing the lshr on smaller types. However, currently there
is no trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst) variant.
This patch add such optimization by transforming trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst)
to ashr A, Cst.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12520
llvm-svn: 246997
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 246953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Trivial multiplication by zero may survive the worklist. We tried to
reassociate the multiplication with a division instruction, causing us
to divide by zero; bail out instead.
This fixes PR24726.
llvm-svn: 246939
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes PR24713.
llvm-svn: 246933
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 246908
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 246903
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 246899
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12434
llvm-svn: 246896
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 246865
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
warning [NFC]
llvm-svn: 246810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a first step towards a new implementation of the base pointer inference algorithm, introduce an abstraction for BDVs, strengthen the assertions around them, and rewrite the BDV relation code in terms of the abstraction which includes an explicit notion of whether the BDV is also a base. The later is motivated by the fact we had a bug where insertelement was always assumed to be a base pointer even though the BDV code knew it wasn't. The strengthened assertions in this patch would have caught that bug.
The next step will be to separate the DefiningValueMap into a BDV use list cache (entirely within findBasePointers) and a base pointer cache. Having the former will allow me to use a deterministic visit order when visiting BDVs in the inference algorithm and remove a bunch of ordering related hacks. Before actually doing the last step, I'm likely going to extend the lattice with a 'BaseN' (seen only base inputs) state so that I can kill the post process optimization step.
Phabricator Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12608
llvm-svn: 246809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The visit order being used in the base pointer inference algorithm is currently non-deterministic. When working on http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583, I discovered that we were relying on a peephole optimization to get deterministic ordering in one of the test cases.
This change is intented to let me test and land http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583. The current code will not be long lived. I'm starting to investigate a rewrite of the algorithm which will combine the post-process step into the initial algorithm and make the visit order determistic. Before doing that, I wanted to make sure the existing code was complete and the test were stable. Hopefully, patches should be up for review for the new algorithm this week or early next.
llvm-svn: 246801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Splitting basic blocks really messes up WinEHPrepare. We can remove this
change when SEH uses the new EH IR.
llvm-svn: 246799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add a `cleanupendpad` instruction, used to mark exceptional exits out of
cleanups (for languages/targets that can abort a cleanup with another
exception). The `cleanupendpad` instruction is similar to the `catchendpad`
instruction in that it is an EH pad which is the target of unwind edges in
the handler and which itself has an unwind edge to the next EH action.
The `cleanupendpad` instruction, similar to `cleanupret` has a `cleanuppad`
argument indicating which cleanup it exits. The unwind successors of a
`cleanuppad`'s `cleanupendpad`s must agree with each other and with its
`cleanupret`s.
Update WinEHPrepare (and docs/tests) to accomodate `cleanupendpad`.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12433
llvm-svn: 246751
|