| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The cost modeling was not accounting for the fact we were duplicating the instruction once per predecessor. With a default threshold of 1, this meant we were actually creating #pred copies.
Adding to the fun, there is *absolutely no* test coverage for this. Simply bailing for more than one predecessor passes all checked in tests.
llvm-svn: 341001
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340997
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It broke the clang-cl self-host.
llvm-svn: 340991
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340978
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach LICM to hoist stores out of loops when the store writes to a location otherwise unused in the loop, writes a value which is invariant, and is guaranteed to execute if the loop is entered.
Worth noting is that this transformation is partially overlapping with the existing promotion transformation. Reasons this is worthwhile anyway include:
* For multi-exit loops, this doesn't require duplication of the store.
* It kicks in for case where we can't prove we exit through a normal exit (i.e. we may throw), but can prove the store executes before that possible side exit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50925
llvm-svn: 340974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Assert from PR38737 happens on the dead block inside the parent loop
after unswitching nontrivial switch in the inner loop.
deleteDeadBlocksFromLoop now takes extra care to detect/remove dead
blocks in all the parent loops in addition to the blocks from original
loop being unswitched.
Reviewers: asbirlea, chandlerc
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51415
llvm-svn: 340955
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r340949 due to bot breakage again.
llvm-svn: 340954
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow-up to rL339604 which did the same transform
for a sin libcall. The handling of intrinsics vs. libcalls
is unfortunately scattered, so I'm just adding this next to
the existing transform for llvm.cos for now.
This should resolve PR38458:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38458
If the call was already negated, the negates will cancel
each other out.
llvm-svn: 340952
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, delcypher, morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 340949
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Expand the simplification of `pow(exp{,2}(x), y)` to all FP types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51195
llvm-svn: 340948
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
llvm-svn: 340947
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We were calling getNumUses to check for 1 or 2 uses. But getNumUses is linear in the number of uses. We can instead use !hasNUsesOrMore(3) which will stop the linear scan as soon as it determines there are at least 3 uses even if there are more.
llvm-svn: 340939
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340930
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a test for constant folding to show that
(shuffle undef, undef, mask)
should already be handled via instsimplify.
llvm-svn: 340926
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Another sanitizer buildbot failed this time at bootstrap when
compiling SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp with this assertion:
`dominates(MD, U) && "Memory Def does not dominate it's uses"'.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/15047
llvm-svn: 340925
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This broke the build, see e.g.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lnt/builds/4626/
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt/builds/18647/
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-x86_64-avx2-linux/builds/5856/
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-freebsd/builds/22800/
> We have multiple places in code where we try to identify whether or not
> some instruction is a guard. This patch factors out this logic into a separate
> utility function which works uniformly in all places.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51152
> Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 340923
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rebase rL338240 since the excessive memory usage observed when using
GVNHoist with UBSan has been fixed by rL340818.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49858
llvm-svn: 340922
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have multiple places in code where we try to identify whether or not
some instruction is a guard. This patch factors out this logic into a separate
utility function which works uniformly in all places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51152
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 340921
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch creates file GuardUtils which will contain logic for work with guards
that can be shared across different passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51151
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 340914
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the PR, LoopSink was trying to sink into a catchswitch block, which
doesn't have a valid insertion point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51307
llvm-svn: 340900
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In Thumb1, legal imm range is [0, 255] for ADD/SUB instructions. However, the
legal imm range for LD/ST in (R+Imm) addressing mode is [0, 127]. Imms in
[128, 255] are materialized by mov R, #imm, and LD/STs use them in (R+R)
addressing mode.
This patch checks if a constant is used as offset in (R+Imm), if so, it checks
isLegalAddressingMode passing the constant value as BaseOffset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50931
llvm-svn: 340882
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Form dedicated exits after trivial unswitches.
Fixes PR38737, PR38283.
Reviewers: chandlerc, fedor.sergeev
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, uabelho, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51375
llvm-svn: 340871
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r340860 due to failing tests.
llvm-svn: 340867
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 340860
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340850
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
llvm-svn: 340834
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This fixes PR31105.
There is code trying to delete dead code that does so by e.g. checking if
the single predecessor of a block is the block itself.
That check fails on a block like this
bb:
br i1 undef, label %bb, label %bb
since that has two (identical) predecessors.
However, after the check for dead blocks there is a call to
ConstantFoldTerminator on the basic block, and that call simplifies the
block to
bb:
br label %bb
Therefore we now do the call to ConstantFoldTerminator before the check if
the block is dead, so it can realize that it really is.
The original behavior lead to the block not being removed, but it was
simplified as above, and then we did a call to
Dest->replaceAllUsesWith(&*I);
with old and new being equal, and an assertion triggered.
Reviewers: chandlerc, fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51280
llvm-svn: 340820
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix for the out-of-memory error when compiling SemaChecking.cpp
with GVNHoist and ubsan enabled. I've used a cache for inserted
CHIs to avoid excessive memory usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50323
llvm-svn: 340818
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340808
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(zext x), cst) --> (zext (add x, cst')) to work for vectors
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51236
llvm-svn: 340796
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340790
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lines up with the behavior of an existing transform where if both
operands of the binop are shuffled, we allow moving the binop before the
shuffle regardless of whether the shuffle changes the size of the vector.
llvm-svn: 340787
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exp{,2}()
Fix the issue of duplicating the call to `exp{,2}()` when it's nested in
`pow()`, as exposed by rL340462.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51194
llvm-svn: 340784
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We only use this set for `insert` and `count`, so a hashing container
seems better here.
llvm-svn: 340783
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340744
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have a class `ImplicitControlFlowTracking` which allows us to keep track of
instructions that can abnormally exit and answer queries like "whether or not
there is side-exiting instruction above this instruction in its block".
We may want to have the similar tracking for other types of "special" instructions,
for example instructions that write memory.
This patch separates ImplicitControlFlowTracking into two classes, isolating all
general logic not related to implicit control flow into its parent class. We can
later make another child of this class to keep track of instructions that write
memory.
The motivation for that is that we want to make these checks efficiently in the
patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D50891.
NOTE: The naming of the parent class is not super cool, but the other options we
have are hardly better. Please feel free to rename it as NFC if you think you've
found a more informative name for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50954
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 340728
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have
an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the
whole, this seems like a win and at worst a reasonable cost for removing
`TerminatorInst`.
All of this is part of the removal of `TerminatorInst` from the
`Instruction` type hierarchy.
llvm-svn: 340701
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`isExceptionalTermiantor` and implement it for opcodes as well following
the common pattern in `Instruction`.
Part of removing `TerminatorInst` from the `Instruction` type hierarchy
to make it easier to share logic and interfaces between instructions
that are both terminators and not terminators.
llvm-svn: 340699
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The core get and set routines move to the `Instruction` class. These
routines are only valid to call on instructions which are terminators.
The iterator and *generic* range based access move to `CFG.h` where all
the other generic successor and predecessor access lives. While moving
the iterator here, simplify it using the iterator utilities LLVM
provides and updates coding style as much as reasonable. The APIs remain
pointer-heavy when they could better use references, and retain the odd
behavior of `operator*` and `operator->` that is common in LLVM
iterators. Adjusting this API, if desired, should be a follow-up step.
Non-generic range iteration is added for the two instructions where
there is an especially easy mechanism and where there was code
attempting to use the range accessor from a specific subclass:
`indirectbr` and `br`. In both cases, the successors are contiguous
operands and can be easily iterated via the operand list.
This is the first major patch in removing the `TerminatorInst` type from
the IR's instruction type hierarchy. This change was discussed in an RFC
here and was pretty clearly positive:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123407.html
There will be a series of much more mechanical changes following this
one to complete this move.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47467
llvm-svn: 340698
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D51193
llvm-svn: 340657
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340638
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340619
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
llvm-svn: 340618
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
before it
Once the invariant_start is reached, we know that no instruction *after* it can modify the memory. So, if we can prove the location isn't read *between entry into the loop and the execution of the invariant_start*, we can execute the invariant_start before entering the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51181
llvm-svn: 340617
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people
to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting
or code sinking, where we pick one instruction from a set of
equal instructions among different code paths.
Reviewers: dberlin, nlopes, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47475
llvm-svn: 340606
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Avoid "count" if possible -> use "find" to check for the existence of keys.
Passed llvm test suite.
Reviewers: fhahn, dcaballe, mkuper, rengolin
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51054
llvm-svn: 340563
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Follow up for https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339520 and https://reviews.llvm.org/rL338300
Alive:
```
%A = fcmp oeq float %x, 0.0
%B = fadd nsz float %x, %z
%C = select i1 %A, float %B, float %y
=>
%C = select i1 %A, float %z, float %y
----------
%A = fcmp oeq float %x, 0.0
%B = fadd nsz float %x, %z
%C = select %A, float %B, float %y
=>
%C = select %A, float %z, float %y
Done: 1
Optimization is correct
%A = fcmp une float %x, -0.0
%B = fadd nsz float %x, %z
%C = select i1 %A, float %y, float %B
=>
%C = select i1 %A, float %y, float %z
----------
%A = fcmp une float %x, -0.0
%B = fadd nsz float %x, %z
%C = select %A, float %y, float %B
=>
%C = select %A, float %y, float %z
Done: 1
Optimization is correct
```
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50714
llvm-svn: 340538
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These changes expand the FunctionAttr logic in order to mark functions as
WriteOnly when appropriate. This is done through an additional bool variable
and extended logic.
Reviewers: hfinkel, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48387
llvm-svn: 340537
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When GVN sets the incoming value for a phi to undef because the incoming block
is unreachable it needs to also invalidate the cached info for that phi in
MemoryDependenceAnalysis, otherwise later queries will return stale information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51099
llvm-svn: 340529
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340526
|