| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300437
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300435
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
don't compute known bits for the LHS twice.
If we already called computeKnownBits for the RHS being a constant power of 2, we've already computed everything we can and should just stop. I think previously we would still recurse if we had determined the result was negative or had not determined the sign bit at all.
llvm-svn: 300432
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use a SmallSetVector instead.
llvm-svn: 300431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constants with DemandedMask.
Just because we didn't demand them doesn't mean they aren't known.
llvm-svn: 300430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds new optimization (Folding cmp(sub(a,b),0) into cmp(a,b))
to instCombineCall pass and was written specific for X86 CMP intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31398
llvm-svn: 300422
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vector constants
llvm-svn: 300402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a version of D32090 that unifies all of the
`getInstrProf*SectionName` helper functions. (Note: the build failures
which D32090 would have addressed were fixed with r300352.)
We should unify these helper functions because they are hard to use in
their current form. E.g we recently introduced more helpers to fix
section naming for COFF files. This scheme doesn't totally succeed at
hiding low-level details about section naming, so we should switch to an
API that is easier to maintain.
This is not an NFC commit because it fixes llvm-cov's testing support
for COFF files (this falls out of the API change naturally). This is an
area where we lack tests -- I will see about adding one as a follow up.
Testing: check-clang, check-profile, check-llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32097
llvm-svn: 300381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When checking if we should return a constant, we create some temporary APInts to see if we know all bits. But the exact computations we do are needed in several other locations in the same code.
This patch moves them to named temporaries so we can reuse them.
Ideally we'd write directly to KnownZero/One, but we currently seem to only write those variables after all the simplifications checks and I didn't want to change that with this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32094
llvm-svn: 300376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
llvm-svn: 300367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
...when C1 differs from C2 by one bit and C1 <u C2:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vuo
And move related folds to a helper function. This reduces code duplication and
will make it easier to remove the scalar-only restriction as a follow-up step.
llvm-svn: 300364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
llvm-svn: 300363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
code when LHS/RHS aren't BinaryOperators
Currently this code always makes 2 or 3 calls to tryFactorization regardless of whether the LHS/RHS are BinaryOperators. We make 3 calls when both operands are BinaryOperators with the same opcode. Or surprisingly, when neither are BinaryOperators. This is because getBinOpsForFactorization returns Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd when the operand is not a BinaryOperator. If both LHS and RHS are not BinaryOperators then they both have an Opcode of Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd. When this happens we rely on tryFactorization to early out due to A/B/C/D being null. Similar behavior occurs for the other calls, we rely on getBinOpsForFactorization having made A/B or C/D null to get tryFactorization to early out.
We also rely on these null checks to check the result of getIdentityValue and early out for it.
This patches refactors this to pull these checks up to SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws so we don't rely on BinaryOpsEnd as a sentinel or this A/B/C/D null behavior. I think this makes this code easier to reason about. Should also give a tiny performance improvement for cases where the LHS or RHS isn't a BinaryOperator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31913
llvm-svn: 300353
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300344
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is cleaner to have a callback based system where the logic of
whether an add recurrence is normalized or not lives on IVUsers.
This is one step in a multi-step cleanup.
llvm-svn: 300330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is part of D28975's breakdown - no change in output intended.
LV's code currently assumes the vectorized loop is a single basic block up
until predicateInstructions() is called. This patch removes two manifestations
of this assumption (loop phi incoming values, dominator tree update) by
replacing the use of vectorLoopBody with the vectorized loop's latch/header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32040
llvm-svn: 300310
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300305
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
have >1 value, unless we can prove the phi node is cycle free.
Fixes PR 32607.
llvm-svn: 300299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR/32584
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32023
llvm-svn: 300277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add hasParamAttribute() and use it instead of hasAttribute(ArgNo+1,
Kind) everywhere.
The fact that the AttributeList index for an argument is ArgNo+1 should
be a hidden implementation detail.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300272
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getLowBitsSet. NFC
llvm-svn: 300265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For LCSSA purposes, loop BBs not dominating any of the exits aren't
interesting, as none of the values defined in these blocks can be
used outside the loop.
The way the code computed this information was by comparing each
BB of the loop with each of the exit blocks and ask the dominator tree
about their dominance relation. This is slow.
A more efficient way, implemented here, is that of starting from the
exit blocks and walking the dom upwards until we hit an header. By
transitivity, all the blocks we encounter in our path dominate an exit.
For the testcase provided in PR31851, this reduces compile time on
`opt -O2` by ~25%, going from 1m47s to 1m22s.
Thanks to Dan/MichaelZ for discussions/suggesting the approach/review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31843
llvm-svn: 300255
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Bug noticed by inspection.
Extend the test to handle invokes as well as calls, and rewrite it to
not depend on the inliner and other passes.
Also simplify the call site replacement code with CallSite, similar to
what I did to dead arg elimination and arg promotion (rL300235 and
rL300229).
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32041
llvm-svn: 300251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We could otherwise add BBs not belonging to a loop in `formLCSSA`
and later crash when trying to iterate the loop blocks.
llvm-svn: 300244
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300243
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
callsite_location+callee_name
Summary: For iterative SamplePGO, an indirect call can be speculatively promoted to multiple direct calls and get inlined. All these promoted direct calls will share the same callsite location (offset+discriminator). With the current implementation, we cannot distinguish between different promotion candidates and its inlined instance. This patch adds callee_name to the key of the callsite sample map. And added helper functions to get all inlined callee samples for a given callsite location. This helps the profile annotator promote correct targets and inline it before annotation, and ensures all indirect call targets to be annotated correctly.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31950
llvm-svn: 300240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In first order recurrences where phi's are used outside the loop,
we should generate an additional vector.extract of the second last element from
the vectorized phi update.
This is because we require the phi itself (which is the value at the second last
iteration of the vector loop) and not the phi's update within the loop.
Also fix the code gen when we just unroll, but don't vectorize.
Fixes PR32396.
Reviewers: mssimpso, mkuper, anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31979
llvm-svn: 300238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is effectively a retry of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL299851
but now we have tests and an assert to make sure the bug
that was exposed with that attempt will not happen again.
I'll fix the code duplication and missing sibling fold next,
but I want to make this change as small as possible to reduce
risk since I messed it up last time.
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
llvm-svn: 300236
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300235
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Noticed by inspection while doing attribute work. DAE, InstCombineCalls,
and ArgPromotion have a fair amount of duplicated code for hacking on
call sites, and you can find bugs by comparing them.
Add a test case for this.
llvm-svn: 300229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's less efficient to produce 'ule' than 'ult' since we know we're going to
canonicalize to 'ult', but we shouldn't have duplicated code for these folds.
As a trade-off, this was a pretty terrible way to make a '2'. :)
if (LHSC == SubOne(RHSC))
AddC = ConstantExpr::getSub(AddOne(RHSC), LHSC);
The next steps are to share the code to fix PR32524 and add the missing 'and'
fold that was left out when PR14708 was fixed:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14708
llvm-svn: 300222
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300202
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r296872 now that PR32153 has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 300200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactoring InnerLoopVectorizer's vectorizeBlockInLoop() to provide
vectorizeInstruction(). Aligning DeadInstructions with its only user.
Facilitates driving the transformation by VPlan - follows
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28975 and its tentative breakdown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31997
llvm-svn: 300183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems like a much more natural API, based on Derek Schuff's
comments on r300015. It further hides the implementation detail of
AttributeList that function attributes come last and appear at index
~0U, which is easy for the user to screw up. git diff says it saves code
as well: 97 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
This also makes it easier to change the implementation, which I want to
do next.
llvm-svn: 300153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
known bits using the LHS/RHS known bits it already acquired without recursing back into computeKnownBits.
This replicates the known bits and constant creation code from the single use case for these instructions and adds it here. The computeKnownBits and constant creation code for other instructions is now in the default case of the opcode switch.
llvm-svn: 300094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bits on both sides are known to be zero into a constant 0.
We already handled a superset check that included the known ones too and folded to a constant that may include ones. But it can also handle the case of no ones.
llvm-svn: 300093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32486
...the canonicalization of vector select to shufflevector does not hold up
when undef elements are present in the condition vector.
Try to make the undef handling clear in the code and the LangRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31980
llvm-svn: 300092
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cascaded ifs on opcode. NFC
llvm-svn: 300085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instruction that has multiple uses, if we know all the bits for the demanded bits for this context we can go ahead and create a constant.
Currently if we reach an instruction with multiples uses we know we can't do any optimizations to that instruction itself since we only have the demanded bits for one of the users. But if we know all of the bits are zero/one for that one user we can still go ahead and create a constant to give to that user.
This might then reduce the instruction to having a single use and allow additional optimizations on the other path.
This picks up an additional case that r300075 didn't catch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31552
llvm-svn: 300084
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions with multiple uses out to a separate method. NFCI
llvm-svn: 300082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
below the highest demanded bit can be simplified
If we are adding/subtractings 0s below the highest demanded bit we can just use the other operand and remove the operation.
My primary motivation is observing that we can call ShrinkDemandedConstant for the add/sub and create a 0 constant, rather than removing the add completely. In the case I saw, we modified the constant on an add instruction to a 0, but the add is not put into the worklist. So we didn't revisit it until the next InstCombine iteration. This caused an IR modification to remove add and a subsequent iteration to be ran.
With this change we get bypass the add in the first iteration and prevent the second iteration from changing anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31120
llvm-svn: 300075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One potential way to make InstCombine (very slightly?) faster is to recycle instructions
when possible instead of creating new ones. It's not explicitly stated AFAIK, but we don't
consider this an "InstSimplify". We could, however, make a new layer to house transforms
like this if that makes InstCombine more manageable (just throwing out an idea; not sure
how much opportunity is actually here).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31863
llvm-svn: 300067
|