| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Enable some of the existing size optimizations for cold code under PGO.
A ~5% code size saving in big internal app under PGO.
The way it gets BFI/PSI is discussed in the RFC thread
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/130894.html
Note it doesn't currently touch loop passes.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, smeenai, mehdi_amini, eraman, zzheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59514
llvm-svn: 358422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename the functions that query the optimization kind attributes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60287
llvm-svn: 357731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Emscripten OS provides a definition of __EMSCRIPTEN__, and also that it
supports iprintf optimizations.
Also define small_printf optimizations, which is a printf with float support
but not long double (which in wasm can be useful since long doubles are 128
bit and force linking of float128 emulation code). This part is based on
sunfish's https://reviews.llvm.org/D57620 (which can't land yet since
the WASI integration isn't ready yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60167
llvm-svn: 357552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code might intend to replace puts("") with putchar('\n') even if the
return value is used. It failed because use_empty() was used to guard
the whole block. While returning '\n' (putchar('\n')) is technically
correct (puts is only required to return a nonnegative number on
success), doing this looks weird and there is really little benefit to
optimize puts whose return value is used. So don't do that.
llvm-svn: 355921
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 355905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Right now, when we encounter a string equality check,
e.g. `if (memcmp(a, b, s) == 0)`, we try to expand to a comparison if `s` is a
small compile-time constant, and fall back on calling `memcmp()` else.
This is sub-optimal because memcmp has to compute much more than
equality.
This patch replaces `memcmp(a, b, s) == 0` by `bcmp(a, b, s) == 0` on platforms
that support `bcmp`.
`bcmp` can be made much more efficient than `memcmp` because equality
compare is trivially parallel while lexicographic ordering has a chain
dependency.
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jyknight, ckennelly, gchatelet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56593
llvm-svn: 355672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The C standard says "The memchr function locates the first
occurrence of c (converted to an unsigned char)[...]". The expansion
was missing the conversion to unsigned char.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39041 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55947
llvm-svn: 350775
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Undo stray change introduced by r344725.
llvm-svn: 344814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In several places in the code we use the following pattern:
if (hasUnaryFloatFn(&TLI, Ty, LibFunc_tan, LibFunc_tanf, LibFunc_tanl)) {
[...]
Value *Res = emitUnaryFloatFnCall(X, TLI.getName(LibFunc_tan), B, Attrs);
[...]
}
In short, we check if there is a lib-function for a certain type, and then
we _always_ fetch the name of the "double" version of the lib function and
construct a call to the appropriate function, that we just checked exists,
using that "double" name as a basis.
This is of course a problem in cases where the target doesn't support the
"double" version, but e.g. only the "float" version.
In that case TLI.getName(LibFunc_tan) returns "", and
emitUnaryFloatFnCall happily appends an "f" to "", and we erroneously end
up with a call to a function called "f".
To solve this, the above pattern is changed to
if (hasUnaryFloatFn(&TLI, Ty, LibFunc_tan, LibFunc_tanf, LibFunc_tanl)) {
[...]
Value *Res = emitUnaryFloatFnCall(X, &TLI, LibFunc_tan, LibFunc_tanf,
LibFunc_tanl, B, Attrs);
[...]
}
I.e instead of first fetching the name of the "double" version and then
letting emitUnaryFloatFnCall() add the final "f" or "l", we let
emitUnaryFloatFnCall() fetch the right name from TLI.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, bjope, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53370
llvm-svn: 344725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53338
llvm-svn: 344645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Fixes PR39177
Reviewers: spatel, jbuening
Reviewed By: jbuening
Subscribers: jbuening, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53129
llvm-svn: 344454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
references to it.
InstCombine keeps a worklist and assumes that optimizations don't
eraseFromParent() the instruction, which SimplifyLibCalls violates. This change
adds a new callback to SimplifyLibCalls to let clients specify their own hander
for erasing actions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52729
llvm-svn: 344251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The strcmp->memcmp transform can make the resulting memcmp read
uninitialized data, which MSan doesn't like.
Resolves https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/993.
Reviewers: eugenis, xbolva00
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52272
llvm-svn: 342582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: evandro, efriedma, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51435
llvm-svn: 341330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
llvm-svn: 341095
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It broke the clang-cl self-host.
llvm-svn: 340991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Expand the simplification of `pow(exp{,2}(x), y)` to all FP types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51195
llvm-svn: 340948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
llvm-svn: 340947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exp{,2}()
Fix the issue of duplicating the call to `exp{,2}()` when it's nested in
`pow()`, as exposed by rL340462.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51194
llvm-svn: 340784
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor all cases dealing with `exp{,2,10}()` into one function in
preparation for D49273. Otherwise, NFC.
llvm-svn: 340061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow-up suggested with rL339604.
For tan(), we don't have a corresponding LLVM
intrinsic -- unlike sin/cos -- so this is the
only way/place that we can do this fold currently.
llvm-svn: 339958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Expand the number of cases when `pow(x, 0.5)` is simplified into `sqrt(x)`
by considering the math semantics with more granularity.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50036
llvm-svn: 339887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(retry r339608)
Even though this code is below a function called optimizeFloatingPointLibCall(),
we apparently can't guarantee that we're dealing with FPMathOperators, so bail
out immediately if that's not true.
llvm-svn: 339618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reflection folds
Can't set the builder flags without knowing this is an FPMathOperator. I'll add a test
for that and try again.
llvm-svn: 339609
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 339608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a very partial fix for the reported problem. I suspect
we do not get this fold in most motivating cases because most of
the time, the libcall would have been replaced by an intrinsic,
and that optimization is handled elsewhere...but maybe it should
be handled here?
llvm-svn: 339604
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 339588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also consider vector constants when simplifying `pow()`.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50035
llvm-svn: 339578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Motivation examples:
int strcmp_memcmp() {
char buf[12];
return strcmp(buf, "key") == 0;
}
int strcmp_memcmp2() {
char buf[12];
return strcmp(buf, "key") != 0;
}
int strncmp_memcmp() {
char buf[12];
return strncmp(buf, "key", 3) == 0;
}
can be turned to memcmp.
See test file for more cases.
Reviewers: efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: spatel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50233
llvm-svn: 339410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Properly shrink `pow()` to `powf()` as a binary function and, when no other
simplification applies, do not discard it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50113
llvm-svn: 339046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Merge the helper functions for shrinking unary and binary functions into a
single one, while keeping all their functionality. Otherwise, NFC.
llvm-svn: 338905
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 338730
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reword comments and minor code reformatting.
llvm-svn: 338446
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sed -Ei 's/[[:space:]]+$//' include/**/*.{def,h,td} lib/**/*.{cpp,h}
llvm-svn: 338293
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use more meaningful variable names. Mostly NFC.
llvm-svn: 338266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the
file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original
change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which
was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a
template/inlined in the header) but not in general)
llvm-svn: 333954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
* Use "find('%')" instead of loop to find '%' char (we already uses find('%') in optimizePrintFString..)
* Convert getParent() chains to getModule()/getFunction()
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47397
llvm-svn: 333668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, produce the canonical IR abs (s<0) to be more efficient.
This is the libcall equivalent of the clang builtin change from:
rL333038
Pasting from that commit message:
The stdlib functions are defined in section 7.20.6.1 of the C standard with:
"If the result cannot be represented, the behavior is undefined."
That lets us mark the negation with 'nsw' because "sub i32 0, INT_MIN" would
be UB/poison.
llvm-svn: 333042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Previous patch does not care if a value is changed between calloc and strlen. This needs to be removed from InstCombine and maybe moved to DSE later after some rework.
Reviewers: efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47218
llvm-svn: 333022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Example cases:
strlen(calloc(...)) -> 0
Reviewers: efriedma, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47059
llvm-svn: 332990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: If file stream arg is not captured and source is fopen, we could replace IO calls by unlocked IO ("_unlocked" function variants) to gain better speed,
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, spatel, sanjoy, hfinkel, majnemer, lebedev.ri, rja
Reviewed By: rja
Subscribers: rja, srhines, efriedma, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45736
llvm-svn: 332452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, majnemer, rja, bkramer
Reviewed By: rja, bkramer
Subscribers: mstorsjo, rja, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46285
llvm-svn: 332110
|