| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: samparker, karthikthecool, blitz.opensource
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45209
llvm-svn: 329269
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LoopInterchange relies on LoopInfo being up-to-date, so we should
preserve it after interchanging. This patch updates restructureLoops to
move the BBs of the interchanged loops to the right place.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45278
llvm-svn: 329264
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It also updates test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/call-instructions.ll
to use accesses where we can prove dependence after D35430.
Reviewers: sebpop, karthikthecool, blitz.opensource
Reviewed By: sebpop
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45206
llvm-svn: 329111
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
declarations amongst Scalar.h and IPO.h
Fixes layering - Transforms/Utils shouldn't depend on including a Scalar
or IPO header, because Scalar and IPO depend on Utils.
llvm-svn: 328717
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's been quite some time the Dependence Analysis (DA) is broken,
as it uses the GEP representation to "identify" multi-dimensional arrays.
It even wrongly detects multi-dimensional arrays in single nested loops:
from test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Coupled.ll, example @couple6
;; for (long int i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
;; A[i][3*i - 6] = i;
;; *B++ = A[i][i];
DA used to detect two subscripts, which makes no sense in the LLVM IR
or in C/C++ semantics, as there are no guarantees as in Fortran of
subscripts not overlapping into a next array dimension:
maximum nesting levels = 1
SrcPtrSCEV = %A
DstPtrSCEV = %A
using GEPs
subscript 0
src = {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
dst = {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
class = 1
loops = {1}
subscript 1
src = {-6,+,3}<nsw><%for.body>
dst = {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
class = 1
loops = {1}
Separable = {}
Coupled = {1}
With the current patch, DA will correctly work on only one dimension:
maximum nesting levels = 1
SrcSCEV = {(-2424 + %A)<nsw>,+,1212}<%for.body>
DstSCEV = {%A,+,404}<%for.body>
subscript 0
src = {(-2424 + %A)<nsw>,+,1212}<%for.body>
dst = {%A,+,404}<%for.body>
class = 1
loops = {1}
Separable = {0}
Coupled = {}
This change removes all uses of GEP from DA, and we now only rely
on the SCEV representation.
The patch does not turn on -da-delinearize by default, and so the DA analysis
will be more conservative in the case of multi-dimensional memory accesses in
nested loops.
I disabled some interchange tests, as the DA is not able to disambiguate
the dependence anymore. To make DA stronger, we may need to
compute a bound on the number of iterations based on the access functions
and array dimensions.
The patch cleans up all the CHECKs in test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/*.ll to
avoid checking for snippets of LLVM IR: this form of checking is very hard to
maintain. Instead, we now check for output of the pass that are more meaningful
than dozens of lines of LLVM IR. Some tests now require -debug messages and thus
only enabled with asserts.
Patch written by Sebastian Pop and Aditya Kumar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35430
llvm-svn: 326837
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The dependency matrix is only empty if no conflicting load/store
instructions have been found. In that case, it is safe to interchange.
For the LLVM test-suite, after this change around 1900 loops are
interchanged, whereas it is 15 before this change. On cortex-a57,
this gives an improvement of -0.57% on the geomean execution
time of SPEC2006, SPEC2000 and the test-suite. There are a
few small perf regressions, but I think we can improve on those
by making the cost model better.
Reviewers: karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed by: karthikthecool
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43236
llvm-svn: 326077
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can use incremental dominator tree updates to avoid re-calculating
the dominator tree after interchanging 2 loops.
Reviewers: dmgreen, kuhar
Reviewed By: kuhar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43176
llvm-svn: 325122
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In cases where the OuterMostLoopLatchBI only has a single successor,
accessing the second successor will fail.
This fixes a failure when building the test-suite with loop-interchange
enabled.
Reviewers: mcrosier, karthikthecool, davide
Reviewed by: karthikthecool
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42906
llvm-svn: 324994
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can use SplitBlock for both cases, which makes the code slightly
simpler and updates both LoopInfo and the dominator tree.
llvm-svn: 324881
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The way that splitInnerLoopHeader splits blocks requires that
the induction PHI will be the first PHI in the inner loop
header. This makes sure that is actually the case when there
are both IV and reduction phis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38682
llvm-svn: 316261
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 315940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameterized emit() calls
Summary: This is not functional change to adopt new emit() API added in r313691.
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38285
llvm-svn: 315476
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sync it up with the name of the class actually defined here. This has been
bothering me for a while...
llvm-svn: 315249
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
SimplifyIndVar may introduce zext instructions to widen arguments of the
loop exit check. They should not prevent us from splitting the loop at
the induction variable, but maybe the check should be more conservative,
e.g. making sure it only extends arguments used by a comparison?
Reviewers: karthikthecool, mcrosier, mzolotukhin
Reviewed By: mcrosier
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34879
llvm-svn: 311783
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Without any information about the called function, we cannot be sure
that it is safe to interchange loops which contain function calls. For
example there could be dependences that prevent interchanging between
accesses in the called function and the loops. Even functions without any
parameters could cause problems, as they could access memory using
global pointers.
For now, I think it is only safe to interchange loops with calls marked
as readnone.
With this patch, the LLVM test suite passes with `-O3 -mllvm
-enable-loopinterchange` and LoopInterchangeProfitability::isProfitable
returning true for all loops. check-llvm and check-clang also pass when
bootstrapped in a similar fashion, although only 3 loops got
interchanged.
Reviewers: karthikthecool, blitz.opensource, hfinkel, mcrosier, mkuper
Reviewed By: mcrosier
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35489
llvm-svn: 309547
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The remaining non range-based for loops do not iterate over full ranges,
so leave them as they are.
Reviewers: karthikthecool, blitz.opensource, mcrosier, mkuper, aemerson
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35777
llvm-svn: 308872
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: anemet, karthikthecool, blitz.opensource
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35122
llvm-svn: 308094
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This makes it easier to find out which limitation prevented this pass from doing its work.
Reviewers: karthikthecool, mzolotukhin, efriedma, mcrosier
Reviewed By: mcrosier
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34940
llvm-svn: 307035
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is, in fact, unused. Found while reviewing Danny's new
SSAUpdater and porting passes to it to see how the new API
looked like.
llvm-svn: 293407
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This creates non-linear behavior in the inliner (see more details in
r289755's commit thread).
llvm-svn: 290086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This condition is trivially always true prior to the change. The comment
at the call site makes it clear that we expect *all* of these to be '=',
'S', or 'I' so fix the code.
We have a bug I will update to track the fact that Clang doesn't warn on
this: http://llvm.org/PR13101
llvm-svn: 285930
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, we give up on loop interchange if we encounter a flow dependency
anywhere in the loop list. Worse yet, we don't even track output dependencies.
This patch updates the dependency matrix computation to track flow and output
dependencies in the same way we track anti dependencies.
This improves an internal workload by 2.2x.
Note the loop interchange pass is off by default and it can be enabled with
'-mllvm -enable-loopinterchange'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24564
llvm-svn: 282101
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 282071
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281501
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mostly useful for getting consistent lit testing.
llvm-svn: 281500
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281497
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281334
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281331
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281330
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281328
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281212
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 280834
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 280820
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 280819
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
No functionality change is intended.
llvm-svn: 278417
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowed loop vectorization with secondary FP IVs. Like this:
float *A;
float x = init;
for (int i=0; i < N; ++i) {
A[i] = x;
x -= fp_inc;
}
The auto-vectorization is possible when the induction binary operator is "fast" or the function has "unsafe" attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21330
llvm-svn: 276554
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Only minor manual fixes. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 273808
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the code a little more concise, no functional change is
intended.
llvm-svn: 273644
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Found by gcc 6.
llvm-svn: 273402
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Found by gcc 6.
llvm-svn: 273303
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21090
llvm-svn: 272294
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoids unnecessary copies. All changes audited & pass tests with asan.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 272190
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ported DA to the new PM by splitting the former DependenceAnalysis Pass
into a DependenceInfo result type and DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass type
and adding a new PM-style DependenceAnalysis analysis pass returning the
DependenceInfo.
Patch by Philip Pfaffe, most of the review by Justin.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18834
llvm-svn: 269370
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 268654
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19882
llvm-svn: 268457
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A large number of loop utility functions take a `Pass *` and reach
into it to find out which analyses to preserve. There are a number of
problems with this:
- The APIs have access to pretty well any Pass state they want, so
it's hard to tell what they may or may not do.
- Other APIs have copied these and pass around a `Pass *` even though
they don't even use it. Some of these just hand a nullptr to the API
since the callers don't even have a pass available.
- Passes in the new pass manager don't work like the current ones, so
the APIs can't be used as is there.
Instead, we should explicitly thread the analysis results that we
actually care about through these APIs. This is both simpler and more
reusable.
llvm-svn: 255669
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 255095
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251266
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove remaining `ilist_iterator` implicit conversions from
LLVMScalarOpts.
This change exposed some scary behaviour in
lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp around line 1770. This patch changes a
call from `Function::begin()` to `&Function::front()`, since the return
was immediately being passed into another function that takes a
`Function*`. `Function::front()` started to assert, since the function
was empty. Note that `Function::end()` does not point at a legal
`Function*` -- it points at an `ilist_half_node` -- so the other
function was getting garbage before. (I added the missing check for
`Function::isDeclaration()`.)
Otherwise, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 250211
|