summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [Constants] If we already have a ConstantInt*, prefer to use ↵Craig Topper2017-07-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | isZero/isOne/isMinusOne instead of isNullValue/isOneValue/isAllOnesValue inherited from Constant. NFCI Going through the Constant methods requires redetermining that the Constant is a ConstantInt and then calling isZero/isOne/isMinusOne. llvm-svn: 307292
* [Atomics] Rename and change prototype for atomic memcpy intrinsicDaniel Neilson2017-06-161-13/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html This change is to alter the prototype for the atomic memcpy intrinsic. The prototype itself is being changed to more closely resemble the semantics and parameters of the llvm.memcpy intrinsic -- to ease later combination of the llvm.memcpy and atomic memcpy intrinsics. Furthermore, the name of the atomic memcpy intrinsic is being changed to make it clear that it is not a generic atomic memcpy, but specifically a memcpy is unordered atomic. Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, efriedma Reviewed By: reames Subscribers: mzolotukhin, anna, llvm-commits, skatkov Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240 llvm-svn: 305558
* [Atomics][LoopIdiom] Recognize unordered atomic memcpyAnna Thomas2017-06-061-15/+62
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Expanding the loop idiom test for memcpy to also recognize unordered atomic memcpy. The only difference for recognizing an unordered atomic memcpy and instead of a normal memcpy is that the loads and/or stores involved are unordered atomic operations. Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html Patch by Daniel Neilson! Reviewers: reames, anna, skatkov Reviewed By: reames, anna Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33243 llvm-svn: 304806
* Revert "[Atomics][LoopIdiom] Recognize unordered atomic memcpy"Anna Thomas2017-05-311-65/+15
| | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit r304310. It caused build failures in polly and mingw due to undefined reference to llvm::RTLIB::getMEMCPY_ELEMENT_ATOMIC. llvm-svn: 304315
* [Atomics][LoopIdiom] Recognize unordered atomic memcpyAnna Thomas2017-05-311-15/+65
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Expanding the loop idiom test for memcpy to also recognize unordered atomic memcpy. The only difference for recognizing an unordered atomic memcpy and instead of a normal memcpy is that the loads and/or stores involved are unordered atomic operations. Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html Patch by Daniel Neilson! Reviewers: reames, anna, skatkov Reviewed By: reames Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33243 llvm-svn: 304310
* [LIR] Use the newly `getRecurrenceVar()` helper. NFCI.Davide Italiano2017-05-231-4/+4
| | | | llvm-svn: 303704
* [LIR] Strengthen the check for recurrence variable in popcnt/CTLZ.Davide Italiano2017-05-231-9/+16
| | | | | | | Fixes PR33114. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33420 llvm-svn: 303700
* [NFC][loopIdiom] Clang format change rL303434Anna Thomas2017-05-191-3/+5
| | | | llvm-svn: 303439
* [LoopIdiom] Refactor return value of isLegalStore [NFC]Anna Thomas2017-05-191-31/+38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This NFC simply refactors the return value of LoopIdiomRecognize::isLegalStore() from bool to an enumeration, and removes the return-through-parameter mechanism that the function was using. This function is constructed such that it will only ever recognize a single store idiom (memset, memset_pattern, or memcpy), and never a combination of these. As such it makes much more sense for the return value to be the single idiom that the store matches, rather than having a separate argument-return for each idiom -- it's cleaner, and makes it clearer that only a single idiom can be matched. Patch by Daniel Neilson! Reviewers: anna, sanjoy, davide, haicheng Reviewed By: anna, haicheng Subscribers: haicheng, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33359 llvm-svn: 303434
* The patch exclude a case from zero check skip inEvgeny Stupachenko2017-05-161-7/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CTLZ idiom recognition (r303102). Summary: The following case: i = 1; if(n) while (n >>= 1) i++; use(i); Was converted to: i = 1; if(n) i += builtin_ctlz(n >> 1, false); use(i); Which is not correct. The patch make it: i = 1; if(n) i += builtin_ctlz(n >> 1, true); use(i); From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com> llvm-svn: 303212
* The patch adds CTLZ idiom recognition.Evgeny Stupachenko2017-05-151-1/+294
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The following loops should be recognized: i = 0; while (n) { n = n >> 1; i++; body(); } use(i); And replaced with builtin_ctlz(n) if body() is empty or for CPUs that have CTLZ instruction converted to countable: for (j = 0; j < builtin_ctlz(n); j++) { n = n >> 1; i++; body(); } use(builtin_ctlz(n)); Reviewers: rengolin, joerg Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D32605 From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com> llvm-svn: 303102
* [LoopIdiom] check for safety while expandingAditya Kumar2017-05-051-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | Loop Idiom recognition was generating memset in a case that would result generating a division operation to an unsafe location. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32674 llvm-svn: 302238
* Empty Space. NFCXin Tong2017-05-011-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 301878
* Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFCSanjoy Das2017-05-011-1/+1
| | | | | | This relands r301424. llvm-svn: 301812
* Reverts commit r301424, r301425 and r301426Sanjoy Das2017-04-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Commits were: "Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts" "Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC" "Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC" The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures. llvm-svn: 301429
* Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFCSanjoy Das2017-04-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: I plan to use WeakVH to mean "nulls itself out on deletion, but does not track RAUW" in a subsequent commit. Reviewers: dblaikie, davide Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, jfb, llvm-commits, nhaehnle Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32266 llvm-svn: 301424
* [LIR] Obey non-integral pointer semanticsSanjoy Das2017-04-241-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: See http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#non-integral-pointer-type Reviewers: haicheng Reviewed By: haicheng Subscribers: mcrosier, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32196 llvm-svn: 301238
* Revert "Compute safety information in a much finer granularity."Evgeniy Stepanov2017-04-241-1/+1
| | | | | | Use-after-free in llvm::isGuaranteedToExecute. llvm-svn: 301214
* Compute safety information in a much finer granularity.Xin Tong2017-04-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Instead of keeping a variable indicating whether there are early exits in the loop. We keep all the early exits. This improves LICM's ability to move instructions out of the loop based on is-guaranteed-to-execute. I am going to update compilation time as well soon. Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, efriedma, mkuper Reviewed By: hfinkel Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32433 llvm-svn: 301196
* Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of variadic ↵Serge Guelton2017-04-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | templates. From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070 llvm-svn: 299949
* Revert "Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templates"Diana Picus2017-04-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | This reverts commit r299925 because it broke the buildbots. See e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/6008 llvm-svn: 299928
* Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templatesSerge Guelton2017-04-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of variadic templates. From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues. llvm-svn: 299925
* Revert "Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templates"Mehdi Amini2017-04-061-2/+3
| | | | | | This reverts commit r299699, the examples needs to be updated. llvm-svn: 299702
* Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templatesMehdi Amini2017-04-061-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of variadic templates. From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues. Patch by: Serge Guelton <serge.guelton@telecom-bretagne.eu> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070 llvm-svn: 299699
* [Analysis] Add LibFunc_ prefix to enums in TargetLibraryInfo. (NFC)David L. Jones2017-01-231-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The LibFunc::Func enum holds enumerators named for libc functions. Unfortunately, there are real situations, including libc implementations, where function names are actually macros (musl uses "#define fopen64 fopen", for example; any other transitively visible macro would have similar effects). Strictly speaking, a conforming C++ Standard Library should provide any such macros as functions instead (via <cstdio>). However, there are some "library" functions which are not part of the standard, and thus not subject to this rule (fopen64, for example). So, in order to be both portable and consistent, the enum should not use the bare function names. The old enum naming used a namespace LibFunc and an enum Func, with bare enumerators. This patch changes LibFunc to be an enum with enumerators prefixed with "LibFFunc_". (Unfortunately, a scoped enum is not sufficient to override macros.) There are additional changes required in clang. Reviewers: rsmith Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, nemanjai, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28476 llvm-svn: 292848
* [PM] Separate the LoopAnalysisManager from the LoopPassManager and moveChandler Carruth2017-01-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | the latter to the Transforms library. While the loop PM uses an analysis to form the IR units, the current plan is to have the PM itself establish and enforce both loop simplified form and LCSSA. This would be a layering violation in the analysis library. Fundamentally, the idea behind the loop PM is to *transform* loops in addition to running passes over them, so it really seemed like the most natural place to sink this was into the transforms library. We can't just move *everything* because we also have loop analyses that rely on a subset of the invariants. So this patch splits the the loop infrastructure into the analysis management that has to be part of the analysis library, and the transform-aware pass manager. This also required splitting the loop analyses' printer passes out to the transforms library, which makes sense to me as running these will transform the code into LCSSA in theory. I haven't split the unittest though because testing one component without the other seems nearly intractable. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28452 llvm-svn: 291662
* [PM] Rewrite the loop pass manager to use a worklist and augmented runChandler Carruth2017-01-111-16/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager. This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and to support invalidation of analyses. An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the simplicity afforded is worth it. This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them. While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is reasonably compact. I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292 llvm-svn: 291651
* Fix typo. NFCXin Tong2017-01-051-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 291178
* [LoopIdiomRecognize] Merge two if conditions into one. NFCI.Davide Italiano2016-10-071-3/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 283579
* Target independent codesize heuristics for Loop Idiom RecognitionAndrew Kaylor2016-08-111-3/+45
| | | | | | | | Patch by Sunita Marathe Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21449 llvm-svn: 278378
* Consistently use LoopAnalysisManagerSean Silva2016-08-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One exception here is LoopInfo which must forward-declare it (because the typedef is in LoopPassManager.h which depends on LoopInfo). Also, some includes for LoopPassManager.h were needed since that file provides the typedef. Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out cleanly. Thanks to David for the suggestion. llvm-svn: 278079
* [PM] Port LoopIdiomRecognize Pass to new PMDehao Chen2016-07-121-36/+80
| | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Port LoopIdiomRecognize Pass to new PM Reviewers: davidxl Subscribers: davide, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22250 llvm-svn: 275202
* [LIR] Fix mis-compilation with unwinding.Haicheng Wu2016-07-061-0/+8
| | | | | | | | To fix PR27859, bail out if there is an instruction may throw. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20638 llvm-svn: 274673
* Apply clang-tidy's modernize-loop-convert to most of lib/Transforms.Benjamin Kramer2016-06-261-3/+3
| | | | | | Only minor manual fixes. No functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 273808
* Forgot to update callers of deleteDeadInstructionDavid Majnemer2016-06-201-2/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 273163
* Reapply "[LoopIdiom] Don't remove dead operands manually"David Majnemer2016-06-201-9/+1
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit r273160, reapplying r273132. RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions cannot be called on a parentless Instruction. llvm-svn: 273162
* Revert "[LoopIdiom] Don't remove dead operands manually"Cong Liu2016-06-201-1/+2
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit r273132. Breaks multiple test under /llvm/test:Transforms (e.g. llvm/test:Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll.test) under asan. llvm-svn: 273160
* [LoopIdiom] Don't remove dead operands manuallyDavid Majnemer2016-06-201-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Removing dead instructions requires remembering which operands have already been removed. RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions has this logic, don't partially reimplement it in LoopIdiomRecognize. This fixes PR28196. llvm-svn: 273132
* IR: Introduce local_unnamed_addr attribute.Peter Collingbourne2016-06-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a local_unnamed_addr attribute is attached to a global, the address is known to be insignificant within the module. It is distinct from the existing unnamed_addr attribute in that it only describes a local property of the module rather than a global property of the symbol. This attribute is intended to be used by the code generator and LTO to allow the linker to decide whether the global needs to be in the symbol table. It is possible to exclude a global from the symbol table if three things are true: - This attribute is present on every instance of the global (which means that the normal rule that the global must have a unique address can be broken without being observable by the program by performing comparisons against the global's address) - The global has linkonce_odr linkage (which means that each linkage unit must have its own copy of the global if it requires one, and the copy in each linkage unit must be the same) - It is a constant or a function (which means that the program cannot observe that the unique-address rule has been broken by writing to the global) Although this attribute could in principle be computed from the module contents, LTO clients (i.e. linkers) will normally need to be able to compute this property as part of symbol resolution, and it would be inefficient to materialize every module just to compute it. See: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160509/356401.html http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160516/356738.html for earlier discussion. Part of the fix for PR27553. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20348 llvm-svn: 272709
* Pass DebugLoc and SDLoc by const ref.Benjamin Kramer2016-06-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | | This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 272512
* [LIR] Set attributes on memset_pattern16.Ahmed Bougacha2016-04-271-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | "inferattrs" will deduce the attribute, but it will be too late for many optimizations. Set it ourselves when creating the call. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17598 llvm-svn: 267762
* [LIR] Reuse variable. NFCI.Ahmed Bougacha2016-04-271-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 267761
* Re-commit optimization bisect support (r267022) without new pass manager ↵Andrew Kaylor2016-04-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | support. The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling). Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172 llvm-svn: 267231
* Revert "Initial implementation of optimization bisect support."Vedant Kumar2016-04-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit r267022, due to an ASan failure: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-RgSan_check/1549 llvm-svn: 267115
* Initial implementation of optimization bisect support.Andrew Kaylor2016-04-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations. The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used. The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172 llvm-svn: 267022
* [LPM] Factor all of the loop analysis usage updates into a common helperChandler Carruth2016-02-191-24/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | routine. We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed. However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board. The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer. They seemed less relevant. With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three. I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes. LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated the test case to match the trivially different output. Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and reliably. Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff, and Ben for help thinking about it as well! Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435 llvm-svn: 261316
* [LIR] Avoid turning non-temporal stores into memsetHaicheng Wu2016-02-171-0/+4
| | | | | | This is to fix PR26645. llvm-svn: 261149
* [LIR] Allow merging of memsets in negatively strided loops.Chad Rosier2016-02-121-5/+7
| | | | | | Last part of PR25166. llvm-svn: 260732
* [LIR] Partially revert r252926(NFC), which introduced a very subtle change.Chad Rosier2016-02-121-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In short, before r252926 we were comparing an unsigned (StoreSize) against an a APInt (Stride), which is fine and well. After we were zero extending the Stride and then converting to an unsigned, which is not the same thing. Obviously, Stides can also be negative. This commit just restores the original behavior. AFAICT, it's not possible to write a test case to expose the issue because the code already has checks to make sure the StoreSize can't overflow an unsigned (which prevents the Stride from overflowing an unsigned as well). llvm-svn: 260706
* [LIR] Add support for structs and hand unrolled loopsHaicheng Wu2016-01-261-46/+189
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a recommit of r258620 which causes PR26293. The original message: Now LIR can turn following codes into memset: typedef struct foo { int a; int b; } foo_t; void bar(foo_t *f, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) { f[i].a = 0; f[i].b = 0; } } void test(foo_t *f, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i += 2) { f[i] = 0; f[i+1] = 0; } } llvm-svn: 258777
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud