summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Clean up: Refactoring the hardcoded value of 6 for ↵Larisse Voufo2015-09-181-3/+4
| | | | | | FindAvailableLoadedValue()'s parameter MaxInstsToScan. (Complete version of r247497. See D12886) llvm-svn: 248022
* Test commit: Fixed a few typos in the comments.David L Kreitzer2015-09-161-6/+6
| | | | llvm-svn: 247793
* Revert "Clean up: Refactoring the hardcoded value of 6 for ↵Larisse Voufo2015-09-151-4/+3
| | | | | | FindAvailableLoadedValue()'s parameter MaxInstsToScan." for preliminary community discussion (See. D12886) llvm-svn: 247716
* Clean up: Refactoring the hardcoded value of 6 for ↵Larisse Voufo2015-09-121-3/+4
| | | | | | FindAvailableLoadedValue()'s parameter MaxInstsToScan. llvm-svn: 247497
* Add GlobalsAA as preserved to a bunch of transformsJames Molloy2015-09-101-0/+2
| | | | | | GlobalsAA must by definition be preserved in function passes, but the passmanager doesn't know that. Make each pass explicitly preserve GlobalsAA. llvm-svn: 247263
* [JumpThreading] make jump threading respect convergent annotation.Jingyue Wu2015-08-311-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: JumpThreading shouldn't duplicate a convergent call, because that would move a convergent call into a control-inequivalent location. For example, if (cond) { ... } else { ... } convergent_call(); if (cond) { ... } else { ... } should not be optimized to if (cond) { ... convergent_call(); ... } else { ... convergent_call(); ... } Test Plan: test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll Patch by Xuetian Weng. Reviewers: resistor, arsenm, jingyue Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12484 llvm-svn: 246415
* [IR] Add token typesDavid Majnemer2015-08-141-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types". The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value whose provenance cannot be obscured. There are several applications for such a type but my immediate motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of BasicBlocks. Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point" and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret. The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two points. What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me the impression that this will not be heroic. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861 llvm-svn: 245029
* Drive-by fixes for LandingPad -> EHPadDavid Majnemer2015-08-041-3/+3
| | | | | | | | This change was done as an audit and is by inspection. The new EH system is still very much a work in progress. NFC for the landingpad case. llvm-svn: 243965
* New EH representation for MSVC compatibilityDavid Majnemer2015-07-311-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11097 llvm-svn: 243766
* Revert the new EH instructionsDavid Majnemer2015-07-101-2/+1
| | | | | | This reverts commits r241888-r241891, I didn't mean to commit them. llvm-svn: 241893
* New EH representation for MSVC compatibilityDavid Majnemer2015-07-101-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, reames, nlewycky, rjmccall Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11041 llvm-svn: 241888
* Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)Alexander Kornienko2015-06-231-1/+1
| | | | | | Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first. llvm-svn: 240390
* Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFCAlexander Kornienko2015-06-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch is generated using this command: tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \ llvm/lib/ Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch! llvm-svn: 240137
* Fix "the the" in comments.Eric Christopher2015-06-191-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 240112
* Move logic from JumpThreading into LazyValue info to simplify caller. Philip Reames2015-06-161-51/+17
| | | | | | | | This change is hopefully NFC. The only tricky part is that I changed the context instruction being used to the branch rather than the comparison. I believe both to be correct, but the branch is strictly more powerful. With the moved code, using the branch instruction is required for the basic block comparison test to return the same result. The previous code was able to directly access both the branch and the comparison where the revised code is not. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9652 llvm-svn: 239797
* [JumpThreading] Simplify comparisons when simplifying branchesPhilip Reames2015-05-071-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | If we have recognized that a conditional is constant at a particular location in the code (while trying to decide if we can simplify a conditional branch), we can eagerly replace that condition with a constant if it's definition is post dominated by the branch in question. In practice, this ends up being a compile time savings at most. JumpThreading would have visited each using branch anyways. CVP would have visited the cmp itself again. Unless LVI gives up early, we shouldn't gain any addition power by doing this transformation early. What we do gain is simplicity and compile time. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9312 llvm-svn: 236684
* Re-sort includes with sort-includes.py and insert raw_ostream.h where it's used.Benjamin Kramer2015-03-231-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 232998
* DataLayout is mandatory, update the API to reflect it with references.Mehdi Amini2015-03-101-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that. This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API. Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the validation. I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up. I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30 independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it seemed cleaner without the intermediate state. Test Plan: Reviewers: echristo Subscribers: llvm-commits From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 231740
* Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the ModuleMehdi Amini2015-03-041-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation. As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module. This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation(). Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not duplicating it more than necessary. One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the module. Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore. Reviewers: echristo Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992 From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 231270
* [PM] Replace the Pass argument to SplitEdge with specific analyses usedChandler Carruth2015-01-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | and updated. This may appear to remove handling for things like alias analysis when splitting critical edges here, but in fact no callers of SplitEdge relied on this. Similarly, all of them wanted to preserve LCSSA if there was any update of the loop info. That makes the interface much simpler. With this, all of BasicBlockUtils.h is free of Pass arguments and prepared for the new pass manager. This is tho majority of utilities that relied on pass arguments. llvm-svn: 226459
* [PM] Pull the analyses used for another utility routine into its APIChandler Carruth2015-01-181-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | rather than relying on the pass object. This one is a bit annoying, but will pay off. First, supporting this one will make the next one much easier, and for utilities like LoopSimplify, this is moving them (slowly) closer to not having to pass the pass object around throughout their APIs. llvm-svn: 226396
* [PM] Separate the TargetLibraryInfo object from the immutable pass.Chandler Carruth2015-01-151-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The pass is really just a means of accessing a cached instance of the TargetLibraryInfo object, and this way we can re-use that object for the new pass manager as its result. Lots of delta, but nothing interesting happening here. This is the common pattern that is developing to allow analyses to live in both the old and new pass manager -- a wrapper pass in the old pass manager emulates the separation intrinsic to the new pass manager between the result and pass for analyses. llvm-svn: 226157
* [PM] Move TargetLibraryInfo into the Analysis library.Chandler Carruth2015-01-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While the term "Target" is in the name, it doesn't really have to do with the LLVM Target library -- this isn't an abstraction which LLVM targets generally need to implement or extend. It has much more to do with modeling the various runtime libraries on different OSes and with different runtime environments. The "target" in this sense is the more general sense of a target of cross compilation. This is in preparation for porting this analysis to the new pass manager. No functionality changed, and updates inbound for Clang and Polly. llvm-svn: 226078
* Standardize {pred,succ,use,user}_empty()Ramkumar Ramachandra2015-01-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | The functions {pred,succ,use,user}_{begin,end} exist, but many users have to check *_begin() with *_end() by hand to determine if the BasicBlock or User is empty. Fix this with a standard *_empty(), demonstrating a few usecases. llvm-svn: 225760
* fix typo; NFCSanjay Patel2015-01-131-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 225753
* Revert r220349 to re-instate r220277 with a fix for PR21330 -- quiteChandler Carruth2014-11-251-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | clearly only exactly equal width ptrtoint and inttoptr casts are no-op casts, it says so right there in the langref. Make the code agree. Original log from r220277: Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which require inttoptr or ptrtoint cast provided there is datalayout available. Eventually, the datalayout can just be required but in practice it will always be there today. To go with the ability to expose available values requiring a ptrtoint or inttoptr cast, helpers are added to perform one of these three casts. These smarts are necessary to finish canonicalizing loads and stores to the operational type requirements without regressing fundamental combines. I've added some test cases. These should actually improve as the load combining and store combining improves, but they may fundamentally be highlighting some missing combines for select in addition to exercising the specific added logic to load analysis. llvm-svn: 222739
* Update SetVector to rely on the underlying set's insert to return a ↵David Blaikie2014-11-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | pair<iterator, bool> This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard library's associative container insert function. This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>, and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>, and then to update all the existing users of those functions... llvm-svn: 222334
* Revert "Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which ↵Hans Wennborg2014-10-211-4/+4
| | | | | | | | require" (r220277) This seems to have caused PR21330. llvm-svn: 220349
* Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which requireChandler Carruth2014-10-211-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | inttoptr or ptrtoint cast provided there is datalayout available. Eventually, the datalayout can just be required but in practice it will always be there today. To go with the ability to expose available values requiring a ptrtoint or inttoptr cast, helpers are added to perform one of these three casts. These smarts are necessary to finish canonicalizing loads and stores to the operational type requirements without regressing fundamental combines. I've added some test cases. These should actually improve as the load combining and store combining improves, but they may fundamentally be highlighting some missing combines for select in addition to exercising the specific added logic to load analysis. llvm-svn: 220277
* Fix a somewhat subtle pair of issues with JumpThreading I introduced inChandler Carruth2014-10-201-3/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | r220178. First, the creation routine doesn't insert prior to the terminator of the basic block provided, but really at the end of the basic block. Instead, get the terminator and insert before that. The next issue was that we need to ensure multiple PHI node entries for a single predecessor re-use the same cast instruction rather than creating new ones. All of the logic here was without tests previously. I've reduced and added a test case from the test suite that crashed without both of these fixes. llvm-svn: 220186
* Teach the load analysis driving core instcombine logic and other bits ofChandler Carruth2014-10-201-1/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | logic to look through pointer casts, making them trivially stronger in the face of loads and stores with intervening pointer casts. I've included a few test cases that demonstrate the kind of folding instcombine can do without pointer casts and then variations which obfuscate the logic through bitcasts. Without this patch, the variations all fail to optimize fully. This is more important now than it has been in the past as I've started moving the load canonicialization to more closely follow the value type requirements rather than the pointer type requirements and thus this needs to be prepared for more pointer casts. When I made the same change to stores several test cases regressed without logic along these lines so I wanted to systematically improve matters first. llvm-svn: 220178
* Allow BB duplication threshold to be adjusted through JumpThreading's ctorMichael Liao2014-09-241-7/+10
| | | | | | | - BB duplication may not be desired on targets where there is no or small branch penalty and code duplication needs restrict control. llvm-svn: 218375
* Make use of @llvm.assume from LazyValueInfoHal Finkel2014-09-071-25/+46
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change teaches LazyValueInfo to use the @llvm.assume intrinsic. Like with the known-bits change (r217342), this requires feeding a "context" instruction pointer through many functions. Aside from a little refactoring to reuse the logic that turns predicates into constant ranges in LVI, the only new code is that which can 'merge' the range from an assumption into that otherwise computed. There is also a small addition to JumpThreading so that it can have LVI use assumptions in the same block as the comparison feeding a conditional branch. With this patch, we can now simplify this as expected: int foo(int a) { __builtin_assume(a > 5); if (a > 3) { bar(); return 1; } return 0; } llvm-svn: 217345
* AA metadata refactoring (introduce AAMDNodes)Hal Finkel2014-07-241-9/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to enable the preservation of noalias function parameter information after inlining, and the representation of block-level __restrict__ pointer information (etc.), additional kinds of aliasing metadata will be introduced. This metadata needs to be carried around in AliasAnalysis::Location objects (and MMOs at the SDAG level), and so we need to generalize the current scheme (which is hard-coded to just one TBAA MDNode*). This commit introduces only the necessary refactoring to allow for the introduction of other aliasing metadata types, but does not actually introduce any (that will come in a follow-up commit). What it does introduce is a new AAMDNodes structure to hold all of the aliasing metadata nodes associated with a particular memory-accessing instruction, and uses that structure instead of the raw MDNode* in AliasAnalysis::Location, etc. No functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 213859
* Revert "[C++11] Add predecessors(BasicBlock *) / successors(BasicBlock *) ↵Duncan P. N. Exon Smith2014-07-211-8/+15
| | | | | | | | | iterator ranges." This reverts commit r213474 (and r213475), which causes a miscompile on a stage2 LTO build. I'll reply on the list in a moment. llvm-svn: 213562
* [C++11] Add predecessors(BasicBlock *) / successors(BasicBlock *) iterator ↵Manuel Jacob2014-07-201-15/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ranges. Summary: This patch introduces two new iterator ranges and updates existing code to use it. No functional change intended. Test Plan: All tests (make check-all) still pass. Reviewers: dblaikie Reviewed By: dblaikie Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4481 llvm-svn: 213474
* Fix an issue with the MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred() helper function where it didOwen Anderson2014-07-121-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | | not properly handle the case where the predecessor block was the entry block to the function. The only in-tree client of this is JumpThreading, which worked around the issue in its own code. This patch moves the solution into the helper so that JumpThreading (and other clients) do not have to replicate the same fix everywhere. llvm-svn: 212875
* Updated comments as suggested by Rafael. Thanks.Dinesh Dwivedi2014-06-191-1/+7
| | | | llvm-svn: 211268
* Fixed jump threading going to infinite loop.Dinesh Dwivedi2014-06-171-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | This patch add code to remove unreachable blocks from function as they may cause jump threading to stuck in infinite loop. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3991 llvm-svn: 211103
* [C++] Use 'nullptr'. Transforms edition.Craig Topper2014-04-251-18/+18
| | | | llvm-svn: 207196
* [Modules] Fix potential ODR violations by sinking the DEBUG_TYPEChandler Carruth2014-04-221-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/... edition. This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE. Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the modules implementation. llvm-svn: 206844
* Consistent use of the noduplicate attribute.Eli Bendersky2014-03-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | The "noduplicate" attribute of call instructions is sometimes queried directly and sometimes through the cannotDuplicate() predicate. This patch streamlines all queries to use the cannotDuplicate() predicate. It also adds this predicate to InvokeInst, to mirror what CallInst has. llvm-svn: 204049
* [C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.Chandler Carruth2014-03-091-10/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
* [C++11] Add 'override' keyword to virtual methods that override their base ↵Craig Topper2014-03-051-2/+2
| | | | | | class. llvm-svn: 202953
* [Modules] Move ValueHandle into the IR library where Value itself lives.Chandler Carruth2014-03-041-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well. This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests. Mmmm, tasty layering. llvm-svn: 202821
* Make DataLayout a plain object, not a pass.Rafael Espindola2014-02-251-1/+2
| | | | | | | Instead, have a DataLayoutPass that holds one. This will allow parts of LLVM don't don't handle passes to also use DataLayout. llvm-svn: 202168
* Make some DataLayout pointers const.Rafael Espindola2014-02-241-1/+1
| | | | | | No functionality change. Just reduces the noise of an upcoming patch. llvm-svn: 202087
* Rename many DataLayout variables from TD to DL.Rafael Espindola2014-02-211-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | I am really sorry for the noise, but the current state where some parts of the code use TD (from the old name: TargetData) and other parts use DL makes it hard to write a patch that changes where those variables come from and how they are passed along. llvm-svn: 201827
* Disable most IR-level transform passes on functions marked 'optnone'.Paul Robinson2014-02-061-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | Ideally only those transform passes that run at -O0 remain enabled, in reality we get as close as we reasonably can. Passes are responsible for disabling themselves, it's not the job of the pass manager to do it for them. llvm-svn: 200892
* Don't eliminate a partially redundant load if it's in a landing pad.Bill Wendling2013-10-211-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | A landing pad can be jumped to only by the unwind edge of an invoke instruction. If we eliminate a partially redundant load in a landing pad, it will create a basic block that violates this constraint. It then leads to other problems down the line if it tries to merge that basic block with the landing pad. Avoid this by not eliminating the load in a landing pad. PR17621 llvm-svn: 193064
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud