| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259425
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A masked scatter with a zero mask means there's no store.
A masked gather with a zero mask means the passthru arg is returned.
This is a continuation of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259369
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392
llvm-svn: 259421
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A masked store with a zero mask means there's no store.
A masked store with an allOnes mask means it's a normal vector store.
This is a continuation of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259369
llvm-svn: 259392
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This miscompile came about because we tried to use a transform which was
only appropriate for xor operators when addition was present.
This fixes PR26407.
llvm-svn: 259375
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A masked load with a zero mask means there's no load.
A masked load with an allOnes mask means it's a normal vector load.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16691
llvm-svn: 259369
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259326
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259325
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259324
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259323
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259295
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These sets perform linear searching in small mode so it is never a good
idea to use SmallSize/N bigger than 32.
llvm-svn: 259283
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259264
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259262
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
opposite extractelement fold (PR26354)
We would infinite loop because we created a shufflevector that was wider than
needed and then failed to combine that with the insertelement. When subsequently
visiting the extractelement from that shuffle, we see that it's unnecessary,
delete it, and trigger another visit to the insertelement.
llvm-svn: 259236
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259002
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
InstCombine and SCCP both want to remove dead code in a very particular
way but using identical means to do so. Share the code between the two.
No functionality change is intended.
llvm-svn: 258653
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The intrinsic target prefix should match the target name
as it appears in the triple.
This is not yet complete, but gets most of the important ones.
llvm.AMDGPU.* intrinsics used by mesa and libclc are still handled
for compatability for now.
llvm-svn: 258557
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of just the pointer.
Reviewers: mjacob, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16422
llvm-svn: 258477
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258360
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258323
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258147
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
get{Source,Result}ElementType.
Summary:
GEPOperator: provide getResultElementType alongside getSourceElementType.
This is made possible by adding a result element type field to GetElementPtrConstantExpr, which GetElementPtrInst already has.
GEP: replace get(Pointer)ElementType uses with get{Source,Result}ElementType.
Reviewers: mjacob, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16275
llvm-svn: 258145
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258062
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258059
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258058
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 258057
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
source element type of the GEP as an argument.
Patch by Eduard Burtescu.
Reviewers: dblaikie, mjacob
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16281
llvm-svn: 258024
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: mjacob
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dsanders, dblaikie
Patch by Eduard Burtescu.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16260
llvm-svn: 257999
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This contains a fix for the issue that caused the revert:
we no longer assume that we can insert instructions after the
instruction that produces the base pointer. We previously
assumed that this would be ok, because the instruction produces
a value and therefore is not a terminator. This is false for invoke
instructions. We will now insert these new instruction directly
at the location of the users.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Look through PHIs, GEPs, IntToPtrs and PtrToInts to expose more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the base
pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have complex
pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs, conversions to
or from integers, etc) the value of the original base pointer will be
hidden to the optimizer and this transformation will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the relevant
uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The GEP comparison
will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257897
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10920.
llvm-svn: 257894
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are several requirements that ended up with this design;
1. Matching bitreversals is too heavyweight for InstCombine and doesn't really need to be done so early.
2. Bitreversals and byteswaps are very related in their matching logic.
3. We want to implement support for matching more advanced bswap/bitreverse patterns like partial bswaps/bitreverses.
4. Bswaps are best matched early in InstCombine.
The result of these is that a new utility function is created in Transforms/Utils/Local.h that can be configured to search for bswaps, bitreverses or both. InstCombine uses it to find only bswaps, CGP uses it to find only bitreversals.
We can then extend the matching logic in one place only.
llvm-svn: 257875
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257496
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257340
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257167
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In setInsertionPoint if the value is not a PHI, Instruction or
Argument it should be a Constant, not a ConstantExpr.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Look through PHIs, GEPs, IntToPtrs and PtrToInts to expose more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the base
pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have complex
pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs, conversions to
or from integers, etc) the value of the original base pointer will be
hidden to the optimizer and this transformation will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the relevant
uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The GEP comparison
will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257164
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Limit this transform to a basic block and guard against PHIs.
Hopefully, this fixes the remaining failures in PR25999:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25999
llvm-svn: 257133
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257069
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257067
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the
base pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have
complex pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs,
conversions to or from integers, etc) the value of the original
base pointer will be hidden to the optimizer and this transformation
will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the
relevant uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The
GEP comparison will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257064
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 256883
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although this solves the test case in PR26015:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26015
And may solve PR25999:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25999
...I suspect this is not the best solution. I think we want to insert the new shuffle
just ahead of the earliest ExtractElementInst that we're replacing, but I don't know
how that should be implemented.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15878
llvm-svn: 256857
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit renames GCRelocateOperands to GCRelocateInst and makes it an
intrinsic wrapper, similar to e.g. MemCpyInst. Also, all users of
GCRelocateOperands were changed to use the new intrinsic wrapper instead.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: reames, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15762
llvm-svn: 256811
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with instructions of token type
Summary: This patch fixes a bug in prepareICWorklistFromFunction, where the loop becomes infinite with instructions of token type. The patch checks if the instruction is token type, and if so it updates EndInst with the current instruction.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15859
llvm-svn: 256792
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 256645
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is an extension of the shuffle combining from r203229:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL203229
The idea is to widen a short input vector with undef elements so the
existing shuffle transform for extract/insert can kick in.
The motivation is to finally solve PR2109:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2109
For that example, the IR becomes:
%1 = bitcast <2 x i32>* %P to <2 x float>*
%ld1 = load <2 x float>, <2 x float>* %1, align 8
%2 = shufflevector <2 x float> %ld1, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%i2 = shufflevector <4 x float> %A, <4 x float> %2, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 4, i32 5>
ret <4 x float> %i2
And x86 SSE output improves from:
movq (%rdi), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = mem[0],zero
movdqa %xmm1, %xmm2
shufps $229, %xmm2, %xmm2 ## xmm2 = xmm2[1,1,2,3]
shufps $48, %xmm0, %xmm1 ## xmm1 = xmm1[0,0],xmm0[3,0]
shufps $132, %xmm1, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm1[0,2]
shufps $32, %xmm0, %xmm2 ## xmm2 = xmm2[0,0],xmm0[2,0]
shufps $36, %xmm2, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm2[2,0]
retq
To the almost optimal:
movhpd (%rdi), %xmm0
Note: There's a tension in the existing transform related to generating
arbitrary shufflevector masks. We avoid that in other places in InstCombine
because we're scared that codegen can't handle strange masks, but it looks
like we're ok with producing those here. I purposely chose weird insert/extract
indexes for the regression tests to see the effect in these cases.
For PowerPC+Altivec, AArch64, and X86+SSE/AVX, I think the codegen is equal or
better for these examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15096
llvm-svn: 256394
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't assume a call's use corresponds to an argument operand, it might
correspond to a bundle operand.
llvm-svn: 256327
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 256131
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This extends the same line of reasoning used in EarlyCSE w/http://reviews.llvm.org/D15352 to the DSE implementation in InstCombine.
Key points:
* We only remove unordered or simple stores.
* The loads producing values consumed by dead stores don't influence whether the store is dead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15354
llvm-svn: 255932
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
[InstCombine] Adding '\n' to debug output. NFC.
Patch by Zhaoshi Zheng <zhaoshiz@codeaurora.org>
Reviewers: apazos, majnemer, weimingz
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15403
llvm-svn: 255920
|