| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
vector constants
llvm-svn: 300402
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When checking if we should return a constant, we create some temporary APInts to see if we know all bits. But the exact computations we do are needed in several other locations in the same code.
This patch moves them to named temporaries so we can reuse them.
Ideally we'd write directly to KnownZero/One, but we currently seem to only write those variables after all the simplifications checks and I didn't want to change that with this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32094
llvm-svn: 300376
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
llvm-svn: 300367
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
...when C1 differs from C2 by one bit and C1 <u C2:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vuo
And move related folds to a helper function. This reduces code duplication and
will make it easier to remove the scalar-only restriction as a follow-up step.
llvm-svn: 300364
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
llvm-svn: 300363
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
code when LHS/RHS aren't BinaryOperators
Currently this code always makes 2 or 3 calls to tryFactorization regardless of whether the LHS/RHS are BinaryOperators. We make 3 calls when both operands are BinaryOperators with the same opcode. Or surprisingly, when neither are BinaryOperators. This is because getBinOpsForFactorization returns Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd when the operand is not a BinaryOperator. If both LHS and RHS are not BinaryOperators then they both have an Opcode of Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd. When this happens we rely on tryFactorization to early out due to A/B/C/D being null. Similar behavior occurs for the other calls, we rely on getBinOpsForFactorization having made A/B or C/D null to get tryFactorization to early out.
We also rely on these null checks to check the result of getIdentityValue and early out for it.
This patches refactors this to pull these checks up to SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws so we don't rely on BinaryOpsEnd as a sentinel or this A/B/C/D null behavior. I think this makes this code easier to reason about. Should also give a tiny performance improvement for cases where the LHS or RHS isn't a BinaryOperator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31913
llvm-svn: 300353
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300305
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add hasParamAttribute() and use it instead of hasAttribute(ArgNo+1,
Kind) everywhere.
The fact that the AttributeList index for an argument is ArgNo+1 should
be a hidden implementation detail.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300272
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
getLowBitsSet. NFC
llvm-svn: 300265
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300253
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Bug noticed by inspection.
Extend the test to handle invokes as well as calls, and rewrite it to
not depend on the inliner and other passes.
Also simplify the call site replacement code with CallSite, similar to
what I did to dead arg elimination and arg promotion (rL300235 and
rL300229).
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32041
llvm-svn: 300251
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is effectively a retry of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL299851
but now we have tests and an assert to make sure the bug
that was exposed with that attempt will not happen again.
I'll fix the code duplication and missing sibling fold next,
but I want to make this change as small as possible to reduce
risk since I messed it up last time.
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
llvm-svn: 300236
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300230
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's less efficient to produce 'ule' than 'ult' since we know we're going to
canonicalize to 'ult', but we shouldn't have duplicated code for these folds.
As a trade-off, this was a pretty terrible way to make a '2'. :)
if (LHSC == SubOne(RHSC))
AddC = ConstantExpr::getSub(AddOne(RHSC), LHSC);
The next steps are to share the code to fix PR32524 and add the missing 'and'
fold that was left out when PR14708 was fixed:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14708
llvm-svn: 300222
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 300202
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems like a much more natural API, based on Derek Schuff's
comments on r300015. It further hides the implementation detail of
AttributeList that function attributes come last and appear at index
~0U, which is easy for the user to screw up. git diff says it saves code
as well: 97 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
This also makes it easier to change the implementation, which I want to
do next.
llvm-svn: 300153
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
known bits using the LHS/RHS known bits it already acquired without recursing back into computeKnownBits.
This replicates the known bits and constant creation code from the single use case for these instructions and adds it here. The computeKnownBits and constant creation code for other instructions is now in the default case of the opcode switch.
llvm-svn: 300094
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bits on both sides are known to be zero into a constant 0.
We already handled a superset check that included the known ones too and folded to a constant that may include ones. But it can also handle the case of no ones.
llvm-svn: 300093
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32486
...the canonicalization of vector select to shufflevector does not hold up
when undef elements are present in the condition vector.
Try to make the undef handling clear in the code and the LangRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31980
llvm-svn: 300092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
cascaded ifs on opcode. NFC
llvm-svn: 300085
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instruction that has multiple uses, if we know all the bits for the demanded bits for this context we can go ahead and create a constant.
Currently if we reach an instruction with multiples uses we know we can't do any optimizations to that instruction itself since we only have the demanded bits for one of the users. But if we know all of the bits are zero/one for that one user we can still go ahead and create a constant to give to that user.
This might then reduce the instruction to having a single use and allow additional optimizations on the other path.
This picks up an additional case that r300075 didn't catch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31552
llvm-svn: 300084
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions with multiple uses out to a separate method. NFCI
llvm-svn: 300082
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
below the highest demanded bit can be simplified
If we are adding/subtractings 0s below the highest demanded bit we can just use the other operand and remove the operation.
My primary motivation is observing that we can call ShrinkDemandedConstant for the add/sub and create a 0 constant, rather than removing the add completely. In the case I saw, we modified the constant on an add instruction to a 0, but the add is not put into the worklist. So we didn't revisit it until the next InstCombine iteration. This caused an IR modification to remove add and a subsequent iteration to be ran.
With this change we get bypass the add in the first iteration and prevent the second iteration from changing anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31120
llvm-svn: 300075
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One potential way to make InstCombine (very slightly?) faster is to recycle instructions
when possible instead of creating new ones. It's not explicitly stated AFAIK, but we don't
consider this an "InstSimplify". We could, however, make a new layer to house transforms
like this if that makes InstCombine more manageable (just throwing out an idea; not sure
how much opportunity is actually here).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31863
llvm-svn: 300067
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.
All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.
Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548
llvm-svn: 300032
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
code. NFC
llvm-svn: 300030
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
For now, it just wraps AttributeSetNode*. Eventually, it will hold
AvailableAttrs as an inline bitset, and adding and removing enum
attributes will be super cheap.
This sinks AttributeSetNode back down to lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31940
llvm-svn: 300014
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299970
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes a TODO in getIdentityValue and may allow some transforms to occur earlier. But I was unable to find any transforms we didn't already handle.
llvm-svn: 299966
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a candidate culprit for multiple bot fails, so reverting pending investigation.
llvm-svn: 299955
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
if all the elements are Undef or ConstantInt.
llvm-svn: 299917
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299915
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This re-lands r299875.
I introduced a bug in Clang code responsible for replacing K&R, no
prototype declarations with a real function definition with a prototype.
The bug was here:
// Collect any return attributes from the call.
- if (oldAttrs.hasAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::ReturnIndex))
- newAttrs.push_back(llvm::AttributeList::get(newFn->getContext(),
- oldAttrs.getRetAttributes()));
+ newAttrs.push_back(oldAttrs.getRetAttributes());
Previously getRetAttributes() carried AttributeList::ReturnIndex in its
AttributeList. Now that we return the AttributeSetNode* directly, it no
longer carries that index, and we call this overload with a single node:
AttributeList::get(LLVMContext&, ArrayRef<AttributeSetNode*>)
That aborted with an assertion on x86_32 targets. I added an explicit
triple to the test and added CHECKs to help find issues like this in the
future sooner.
llvm-svn: 299899
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r299875. A Linux bot came back with a test failure:
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/test-clang-i686-linux-RA/builds/741/steps/test_clang/logs/Clang%20%3A%3A%20CodeGen__2006-05-19-SingleEltReturn.c
llvm-svn: 299878
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
AttributeList::get(Fn|Ret|Param)Attributes no longer creates a temporary
AttributeList just to hide the AttributeSetNode type.
I've also added a factory method to create AttributeLists from a
parallel array of AttributeSetNodes. I think this simplifies
construction of AttributeLists when rewriting function prototypes.
Previously we would test if a particular index had attributes, and
conditionally add a temporary attribute list to a vector. Now the
attribute set vector is parallel to the argument vector already that
these passes already construct.
My long term vision is to wrap AttributeSetNode* inside an AttributeSet
type that holds the enum attributes, but that will come in a follow up
change.
I haven't done any performance measurements for this change because
profiling hasn't shown that any of the affected code is hot.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31198
llvm-svn: 299875
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299871
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
code. Add missing test cases.
In one case I removed commute handling for a multiply with a constant since we'll eventually get the constant on the right hand side.
llvm-svn: 299863
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
since they were missing. NFC
llvm-svn: 299853
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, make the same change in and-of-icmps and remove a hack for detecting that case.
Finally, add some FIXME comments because the code duplication here is awful.
This should fix the remaining IR problem noted in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
llvm-svn: 299851
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
select operations
We currently only fold scalar add of constants into selects. This improves this to support vectors too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31683
llvm-svn: 299847
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is my first time using the commutable matchers so wanted to make sure I was doing it right.
Are there any other matcher tricks to further shrink this? Can we commute the whole match so we don't have to LHS and RHS separately?
Reviewers: davide, spatel
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31680
llvm-svn: 299840
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions into phi nodes
Summary: I noticed in the select folding code that we copied fast math flags, but did not do the same for the similar handling in phi nodes. This patch fixes that to do the same thing as select
Reviewers: spatel, davide, majnemer, hfinkel
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31690
llvm-svn: 299838
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
transform.
llvm-svn: 299837
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
matcher checks in visitXor.
The matchers themselves should be enough.
llvm-svn: 299835
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
very similar (A&B)^B -> ~A & B code. This should be NFC except for the addition of hasOneUse check.
I think this code is still overly complicated and should use matchers, but first I wanted to make it consistent.
llvm-svn: 299834
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299833
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"PredicatesFoldable" returns false for signed/unsigned mismatched pairs,
so these cases should never exist. We'll default to 'unreachable' on those
predicate combos instead.
Most of what's left in these switches belongs in InstSimplify (and may
already be there), so there's probably more that can be done to reduce
this code.
llvm-svn: 299829
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for these combines for vectors
(X^C)|Y -> (X|Y)^C iff Y&C == 0
Y|(X^C) -> (X|Y)^C iff Y&C == 0
llvm-svn: 299822
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299821
|